It's not called apartheid. It's called "ethnic displacement".
Tue, 01/24/2012 - 13:59
That's all right then.
Tue, 01/24/2012 - 14:54
You mean the 800,000 Jews that were ethnically displaced from the Arab countries where they had lived for thousands of years and who to this day have still not received any recompense for the property (worth in the billions) that was unlawfully taken from them?
Tue, 01/24/2012 - 17:39
When any groups are forced to move, we need to distinguish cause and effect.
Ex. Under the Canary Wharf Project in London, new businesses and yuppies displaced the less affluent. Did this constitute lower and working class displacement?
jose (not verified)
Wed, 02/01/2012 - 13:26
@zaheerayin (thanks for attracting my attention on your racist comments), you know Goldstone himself, a judge under the South African apartheid regime, said that Israel was not an apartheid regime and that those who said that had no idea of what they are talking about.
You must be logged in to post a comment.