The Guardian's libel of me


By Stephen Pollard
April 23, 2012
Share

UPDATE:

I've just heard from the Guardian at last that they accept the need for a clarification and will be posting this:

"In a diary item about the presence of blogs by Carlos Cortiglia, the BNP's
mayoral candidate, on the Jewish Chronicle website we stated that the blogs were
still available on November 23. We went on to say that this "conflicts" with the
editor of the JC, Stephen Pollard's, account "that he became aware of
Cortiglia's blog and deleted all trace of it 'last September' ". To clarify: he
told the Guardian's reporter that "in September we were alerted to the fact that
Cortiglia had set up a user blog and the moment we were told, we blocked him and
changed [the] entire system". Mr Pollard has asked us to point out that this was
not meant to imply that all traces of the blogs had been deleted in September –
in fact the measure he took at that time was to block Cortiglia's access. He
ordered the blogs to be deleted more recently."

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

I've had a very instructive week, seeing at first hand how Israel's enemies will lie entirely brazenly in order to further their own ends.

The JC, as many of you will know, used to have an open access policy for its blog hosting. Anyone who wanted to could simply register and set up a blog. (The idea was quite trendy among media outlets when we started it, years ago). We had no involvement at all in the process - any more than, for instance, the Guardian does when people register with it in order to leave comments on its site.

Last autumn, we were alerted to the fact that a man with BNP affiliations had set up a blog.   We immediately barred access to the site to prevent him posting.

That was the end of the matter until earlier this month, when someone searched our archives and found his 3 posts buried inside. 

Gleefully, the antisemitic MPACUK site, along with Stephen Sizer (the vicar whose views we have covered in the paper) ran posts that we had a BNP blogger - without of course checking the context or mentioning the fact we banned him - the message  was that we had invited him to blog.

This then went into the realms of total fantasy when a fanatically anti-Israel blogger called Richard Silverstein simply made up a story that we had announced the BNP man (who is now their candidate for Mayor of London) as our latest columnist.

See what I mean about lying for the furtherance of political ends? These people will do anything to smear the reputation those of us who support Israel's right to exist.

All sorts of rumours went round the blogosphere and Twitter. And they led a Guardian journalist (Andrew Brown) to get in touch to - perfectly reasonably - ask me if it was true. I told him exactly what I've written above.

On Friday, the Guardian published a diary story under the byline of Hugh Muir which, in its own way, defamed me and the JC even more than anyone before. It said I had told them that we had removed all trace of the BNP blogs in September - and then said that because they had seen screen shots of the blog earlier this month, I had lied about this.

That is itself a lie. At no point did I ever say we had deleted all trace of him then. Patently, we didn't - the story only broke because someone saw the archive posts of his in April.

I pointed this out to the Guardian on Friday, and how defamatory it was to suggest I had lied. Their response so far has been to do precisely nothing. I have been told that the 'readers editor' will investigate. I am still waiting for the results of that investigation.

In the meanwhile, that diary post, effectively accusing me of lying, has gone viral - and because it is in the Guardian, some people assume it must be true.

It isn't. The Guardian has published a libel of me and - so far - refused to do anything about it, despite being given the full version of the facts.

Two explanations are possible. First, that somewhere in the passing on of the story from Andrew Brown to Hugh Muir,  words were garbled and they made a mistake. Most of us accept that errors happen - and when pointed out, we correct and apologise.

That they have so far refused to make any correction or apology makes me wonder if the second possible explanation may be more accurate - that they know exactly what they are doing and have deliberately chosen to libel me. 

I'll update this if and when they do the right thing. 

 

COMMENTS

Advis3r

Mon, 04/23/2012 - 12:38

Rate this:

0 points

Why haven't you threatened both The Guardian and Silverstein with proceedings over these scurrilous falsehoods? I am sure there a number of lawyers in London who would be only too pleased to deal with this. It is not only your reputation but that of the JC itself as the recognised mouthpiece of British Jewry even if it infuriates many of them at times.


Jonathan Hoffman

Mon, 04/23/2012 - 14:38

Rate this:

0 points

The only good thing about this Mr Pollard is that you have now seen at first-hand that the Israel-haters have absolutely no scruples about lying, defaming and smearing ad nauseam.

Not only do they try to delegitimise Israel they try to delegitimise those who speak the truth about Israel.

http://cifwatch.com/2012/04/22/the-guardian-richard-silversteins-battle-...

Great CiFWatch piece


Mary in Brighton

Mon, 04/23/2012 - 15:30

Rate this:

1 point

Speaking of far right groups, you can take this to the bank. The EDL will not be returning to Brighton in a hurry. It took the police an hour and a half to move their march the half mile from the station to Churchill's Square. Things didn't get better for the boyos, it continued down hill into a complete shambles. You could just tell they were wishing they were back in Covent Garden.

See below, the official training video for folks that might want to "distance themselves from the EDL".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AOEXVNcf7nw&feature=related


happygoldfish

Mon, 04/23/2012 - 15:43

Rate this:

1 point

Stephen Pollard: The JC … used to have an open access policy for its blog hosting. … Last autumn, we were alerted to the fact that a man with BNP affiliations had set up a blog.   We immediately barred access to the site to prevent him posting.

most internet forums manage to identify and ban racists spammers and other undesirables without also banning nearly all genuine contributors!

that thejc.com should ban the rest of us (from what is still irritatingly called "YOUR BLOGS") without succeeding in removing the problem is bizarre

stephen, if i tell you how to finally remove those three bnp posts, will you let the rest of us back in?


Harvey

Mon, 04/23/2012 - 16:13

Rate this:

0 points

Goldfish
I'm sure you can get blogging rights , only they are a little more selective now .
The problem is BTL commenters who need to be kicked out
A whole range of anonymous scum bags turn up making the blog a nonsense .
Mr Pollard , maybe now you realise that the MPACs , Guardians , Sizers , bds etc are all Singing off the same hymn sheet to one degree or another .
That being the case , we regard them them as one and the same .
Hopefully this has caused you to 'wake up and smell the rosies '
It's time you realigned this once great Jewish paper and speak for our people .
Liberalism is all very fine , but don't expect reciprocity from this assorted band of fascists .
This is your wake up call . Heed it and regain the popular vote and readership .


Real Real Zionist

Mon, 04/23/2012 - 16:25

Rate this:

0 points

Dear God the small band of four extremist raggle taggle gypsies now style themselves " the popular vote ".


Advis3r

Mon, 04/23/2012 - 16:30

Rate this:

0 points

Coming from the Israel hater par execellence that's rich - no pun intended Armbach!


Real Real Zionist

Mon, 04/23/2012 - 16:34

Rate this:

0 points

No pun perceived Jose.


Chris Tucker (not verified)

Mon, 04/23/2012 - 16:40

Rate this:

0 points

"Why haven't you threatened both The Guardian and Silverstein with proceedings over these scurrilous falsehoods?"

That won't be happening.


Chris Tucker (not verified)

Mon, 04/23/2012 - 16:57

Rate this:

0 points

Furthermore, "Ufara Bat-Usherah" (Roberta Moore), the inspiration behind the Jewish Division of the EDL has been a regular contributor and still has an active profile.


happygoldfish

Mon, 04/23/2012 - 17:07

Rate this:

2 points

Harvey: Goldfish
I'm sure you can get blogging rights …

no, i asked stephen pollard (on 26th march 2012), but he didn't even reply


Real Real Zionist

Mon, 04/23/2012 - 17:18

Rate this:

0 points

How interesting is THAT.But did you not find grovelling for blogging rights just a teenzy weenzy bit demeaning ?


Harvey

Mon, 04/23/2012 - 17:29

Rate this:

0 points

Rrz / Millis
We were missing your ground breaking scoop on one of our illustrious anti fascists .
Apparently it was due on the 6th April , was pushed back to the 22nd
But still nothing . Did you mean 2015 or is it as I suspect the fevered imagination of a fantasist


Jon.

Mon, 04/23/2012 - 17:32

Rate this:

0 points

"'wake up and smell the rosies '"

Won't they object?


Real Real Zionist

Tue, 04/24/2012 - 09:10

Rate this:

-1 points

Why Harvey I have not the remotest idea what you are talking about. Give me a clue ?


Advis3r

Tue, 04/24/2012 - 10:11

Rate this:

1 point

@Chris Tucker - now the Guardian has apologised will you?

POST A COMMENT

You must be logged in to post a comment.

STEPHEN POLLARD ON TWITTER

    LATEST COMMENTS