‘Don’t ever let the Palestinians feel at ease’


By Stanley Walinets
February 10, 2012
Share

These are extracts from an article by Ha'aretz journalist Meron Rapoport, in this month's LeMonde Diplomatique (www.mondediplo.com):-
"In testimonies collected and published by the NGO Breaking the Silence, we learn what Israeli soldiers did, and were expected to do, in the West Bank and Gaza in the past decade, to impose the occupation.

“I’ll tell you when I flipped. We were in action in Gaza… We were in a trench and children got closer and threw stones. The orders were that the moment [a Palestinian] can hit you with a stone, he can hit you with a grenade... so I shot him. He was 12, or 15, something like that. I don’t think I killed him. I’m saying that … to sleep better at night. I flipped when … I talked about it with my friends [and] family: I was fucking aiming [a weapon] at someone and I shot him in the leg, in the ass. Everyone was happy, they made me a hero, they announced it in the synagogue. I was in shock”

In his book If This Is a Man, Primo Levi recalls a dream he kept having in Auschwitz.... He was back home, telling his family about the horrors of Auschwitz, but nobody was listening ... This was his nightmare: to tell his story and not be heard, or understood.

Gaza is not Auschwitz, and the Israeli soldiers whose testimonies are collected in "Occupation of the Territories" are not Shoah survivors. Yet they share with Levi the need to tell their stories. Those around them are not interested, they feel threatened by the stories and prefer to ignore them or reinterpret them within their existing ideas of how things work in Gaza, the West Bank, behind the Wall, behind the newly reconstructed checkpoints.....

“What did you want the parents of this soldier to say to him?” said Avihai Stoler, an ex-soldier who helped to collect the testimonies for the book. “‘Don’t worry, kid, you killed a child, so what?’ The parents prefer not to understand his dilemma.”

The book collects testimonies from men and women who have served in the Israeli army in the West Bank and Gaza in the last 10 years. It is the most comprehensive insider account of Israel’s modus operandi in the occupied territories — not the decisions taken in high places, just the everyday reality of Israeli military control over Palestinian homes, fields, roads, property and time, the lives and deaths of inhabitants of the West Bank and Gaza.

Some 40—60,000 Israeli conscripts have served in combat units in the last decade.... Seven hundred and fifty of them were interviewed for this book — 1-2%. The sample is far larger than that needed for an opinion poll or an academic study, so it can’t be denied that this is the way things work.

THE 'NORMAL' SOLDIER'
Shovrim Shtika (Breaking the Silence), which collected the testimonies, was founded in 2004 by some Israeli soldiers who had served in or around Hebron and wanted show Israeli society, and the world, what the occupation felt like. At first they tried to publish horror stories: photos of soldiers who cut off the heads of Palestinians killed in battle and stuck them on the barrel of their guns. But later, they understood that cases of extreme cruelty missed the point. “We are not interested in the soldier who abuses an old man at a checkpoint,” explained Michael Menkin, a founder of the group. “We are interested in the soldier who stands beside him, the ‘normal’ soldier.”

Even so, the book chronicles war crimes: a mentally handicapped Palestinian beaten so badly that he bleeds all over; Palestinian passers-by sent to detonate suspected bombs at the top of a minaret because the military robot cannot climb the stairs; the killing of a unarmed Palestinian because he was standing on a rooftop (“Why did I shoot, you ask me today? Just out of pressure. I surrendered to the pressure of the guys,” according to one testimony). There are also the premeditated executions of unarmed Palestinian policemen in revenge for an attack on a checkpoint; the orders from a high-ranking officer on how to deal with a presumed terrorist lying wounded or dead (“YOU APPROACH THE CORPSE, YOU PUT A GUN BARREL BETWEEN ITS TEETH AND SHOOT”); the stealing, looting or destruction of property.

But “this book is not a Tsahal [army] horror show,” said Stoler. “It is the story of a generation, our generation.” In the first 30 years after the 1967 war, much of the debate within Israel centred on the occupation — the need for it, its evils — but in the last 15 years the word has almost disappeared. Israelis will talk about Judea and Samaria, or the West Bank, or just “the territories”, without using the word “occupied”. The word “occupation” became almost taboo, not to be spoken in public. I was working on a television show and one of the guests said that violence in Israeli society was rising “because of the occupation”. My colleagues in the control room were alarmed. They pleaded with me — tell the anchorman to ask the guest to take back the word "occupation". As if it had the power to burn them.

There are several reasons. The terrorist attacks of the second intifada gave the army carte blanche, in the view of the Israeli public, to “prevent terrorism”. The futile “peace process” became background music, and convinced Israelis that there was no rush to solve the conflict; it made them feel the conflict was already solved because the Israelis had already agreed to give up the territories, have a two-state solution and grant self-determination to the Palestinians..... ........... .......

’OUR MISSION WAS TO DISRUPT'
There is a military factor. Since the beginning of the second intifada, and especially since the construction of the Separation Wall, military control over the Palestinians has become more systematic and “scientific”.......
“Our mission was to disrupt and harass the lives of the citizens,” reads one of the testimonies. “This is how our mission was defined, because the terrorists are citizens, and we want to disrupt [their] activity, and the operational way to [do this] is to harass the lives of the citizens. I am sure of this.”
Harassing the locals and disrupting their lives is not just carelessness or abuse but the cornerstone of Israeli occupation in the West Bank and Gaza.

Avihai Stoler, who spent almost three years in the Hebron area, met Israeli soldiers who had detonated explosive devices in the centre of a village “so that they will know we were here”. According to Stoler a “noisy patrol”, “violent patrol”, “manifestation of presence”, “low-key activity”, “Happy Purim”, are all names for a regular type of action: to enter a village or city in force, throw shock grenades, erect makeshift checkpoints, carry out random house searches, remain there for hours or days “to produce a sense of being persecuted, so they will never feel at ease”. Stoler was citing his orders.

Stoler and Avner Gvaryahu served in an elite unit whose activity had been measured (so they were told by a high-ranking officer) by the number of dead terrorists. They are aware that people don’t want to hear what they have to say. Not a single Israeli TV crew came to their book launch, only foreign media. “My father is second generation after the Shoah,” said Gvaryahu; “In his eyes, we are the persecuted.” But both he and Stoler are optimistic; both of them believe that eventually Israeli society will understand what is being done on its behalf and will change, because it is society that needs fixing, not the army. “I was once interviewed by a Colombian journalist,” said Stoler. “She asked me what all the fuss was about: in Colombia soldiers chop off insurgents’ heads on a daily basis and nobody pays attention. But I think Israeli society wants to be moral. This is what drives us forward; without this collective will there is no point in our action. ...... ......."

End of my extracts. Interesting? Sad? Hopeful, that these soldiers have spoken up?

COMMENTS

Advis3r

Fri, 02/10/2012 - 15:40

Rate this:

0 points

The odious Walinets being his usual odious self. Please tell us how many soldiers belong to "breaking the Silence" compared to the number of soldiers serving in the IDF and how many of them actually deny the right of Israel to exist or belong to extreme left wing parties? Please tell us who funds them?

Note most of the testimony - so-called - is heresay.


Harvey

Fri, 02/10/2012 - 18:20

Rate this:

0 points

Stanley Walinets
Thank you for linking this important article . It cannot be stated often enough that the IDF is indeed the most moral army in the world comprising of men of conscience who face life threatening events on a day to day basis and who need to distinguish between the stone thrower ( also potentially life threatening ) and a grenade launcher .
It would be helpful if you could identify those Palestinians who demonstrate reciprocal conscience and revulsion when Israeli children are getting their throats slit and when Israelis were been blown to pieces in shopping malls and buses during the Intifada .
This would be most helpful in order to reach a balanced perspective .


Stanley Walinets

Fri, 02/17/2012 - 16:32

Rate this:

0 points

Advis3r. "The odious Walinets..." When I was a schoolboy, if someone disagreed with you they called you names in the playground. In their minds, that proved you were wrong and they were right. You are an intelligent adult now - your contributions would have greater value if you could leave your playground attitudes behind.

As to your questions, the answers are there in the report, i.e.,
1) "Some 40—60,000 Israeli conscripts have served in combat units in the last decade.... Seven hundred and fifty of them were interviewed for this book, 1-2%. The sample is far larger than that needed for an opinion poll or an academic study, so it can’t be denied that this is the way things work.";

2) "...how many of them actually deny the right of Israel to exist...?" None of the 750 are reported to have denied Israel that right;

3) "...or belong to extreme left wing parties? Please tell us who funds them?" Ah - Left wing parties = Original Sin, as any playground name-caller will tell you. "Who funds them?" The report tells you - 'Breaking the Silence' is a perfectly legitimate NGO, tho' you may disagree with people who donate to NGO's you don't like.

Now to Harvey. Thank you for making your quite valid points in open and non-vituperative language.

I can't actually name any Palestinians "who demonstrate reciprocal conscience and revulsion when Israeli children are getting their throats slit and when Israelis were been blown to pieces in shopping malls and buses during the Intifada".

But I'm quite sure there are some. For certainly there are humanely-minded people among Palestinians just as there are among all communities, who condemn violence by their countrymen. And I daresay their humanitarian concerns are just as angrily dismissed by their 'might-is-right' fellow-citizens as are humanitarians in every other society, including the UK and Israel.

But in considering violent behaviour by any population, we have to take into account the sources of their violence: and in the case of the Palestinians, the perceived take-over of their country is a key factor, one which in their eyes means they are not 'terrorists' but 'resistance fighters'. Perhaps Israeli Government policies could reduce the violence of Palestinians that Israelis experience?

POST A COMMENT

You must be logged in to post a comment.