moderation policy
![]() | By Skovronek2
April 12, 2011 | Share |
I was disappointed that the JC has deemed any discussion of the Jordan Valley inadmissable. I was looking forward to a lively discussion on the issue. What is it that the JC judges to be so embarrassing here ? I suppose I am going to get banned for this but I am just chaff in the wind. I am too old to care
COMMENTS
13 April, 2011 - 13:58 Rate this: 0 points | Looks to me like old Skovronek was just looking for some lively discussion. He must be out of prunes and oatmeal. |
13 April, 2011 - 14:28 Rate this: 0 points | No,Skovronek2 had "come across" the JC web site by accident, thinking it was a Pro-Paletinian (terrorist) web site. |
Anonymous 13 April, 2011 - 15:10 Rate this: 0 points | Comments for this page are now closed. |
MORE FROM THIS AUTHOR
LATEST COMMENTS
- Jonathan Hoffman RE: Adieu Ken Livingstone
- happygoldfish RE: Andrew Dismore and Ken Livingstone
- Advis3r RE: Prisoners voting: time to ask who governs Britain (Express)
- happygoldfish RE: Prisoners voting: time to ask who governs Britain (Express)
- Advis3r RE: Prisoners voting: time to ask who governs Britain (Express)


Harvey
13 April, 2011 - 12:07
Rate this:
I am sure you realise that your blog such as it is would be better suited to one of the many pro Palestinian websites of which you appear well aware of
In the same way that I would be highly unlikely to be allowed to post an article extolling the virtues of israel on by way of example Islam on line or ism, the same holds true for you posting links which attack israel and fail to provide context and balanced appraisal
Add your own comments to other blogs by all means but I do not believe you have a right to heap opprobrium via your own blog on a site which is naturally conducive to israel