Are schools bad for shuls?
![]() | By Simon Rocker
March 29, 2011 | Share |
The seemingly unstoppable rise in the number of Jewish schools is widely regarded as one of the most positive features of British Jewry.
But not everyone agrees. Here is a dissenting opinion from an unusual source – the United Synagogue.
In an article on its website, Helena Cramer of Woodside Park argues why day schools are not always a good thing: “With this continued growth in number of Jewish schools comes the inevitable demise of the shul cheder and I believe there is for some children a knock-on effect of a fall in shul attendance,” she writes.
COMMENTS
Wed, 03/30/2011 - 14:53 Rate this: 0 points | The difficult and ambivalent relationship between schools and shuls is discussed at length in my book ('The Jewish High School: a complete management guide' - available from Amazon). For most families who send their children to Jewish schools, the school has replaced the shul as the primary institution of Jewish family attachment - hardly surprising, since the kids are at school for 30-40 hrs per week and at shul ....for a lot less. The shuls have lost out because they lose contact with those families, and lose a 'membership feed' channel. But, apropos Ms Cramer, the shuls, the cheder, the youth club and the youth movement were all in decline long before the rise of Jewish schools. [I am not saying - at all - that that was a good thing, but it echoes changing social and group patterns in general society.] What do most shuls offer young children and young families. And what would Anglo-Jewry (or Australian, or US, or Canadian) Jewry look like today if it was not for their school systems??? (And - forgive me - wouldn't Anglo-Jewry look even better if the Jewish Ed in their schools was as intensive as it is in some of the other communities mentioned!) Finally - the familiar arguments against Jewish schools mentioned in Ms Cramer's letter are simply not borne out by the reality. -- Paul Shaviv, Director of Education, TanenbaumCHAt (the Toronto Jewish Community High School, 1,500 students, co-ed, ages 14-18). |
Fri, 04/01/2011 - 14:35 Rate this: 0 points | Helena Cramer's article appeared in the Talking Point section of Women's View (You&US on-line magazine). I am certain that Jonathan Hoffman would not have published anything that did not conform to his narrow views, whereas at Women's View we have a far more tolerant approach and we welcome debate. As Editor it was not for me to agree or disagree with Ms Cramer's views but I can tell you that we whole heartedly welcomed her contribution. |
MORE FROM THIS AUTHOR
LATEST COMMENTS
- happygoldfish RE: SCoJeC and Board of Deputies respond to Church of Scotland revised report
- happygoldfish RE: SCoJeC and Board of Deputies respond to Church of Scotland revised report
- happygoldfish RE: SCoJeC and Board of Deputies respond to Church of Scotland revised report
- happygoldfish RE: MEMO 352
- happygoldfish RE: David Ward blog post written by John Hilley


Jonathan Hoffman
Wed, 03/30/2011 - 11:17
Rate this:
Ms Cramer was clearly educated at the "argument by assertion" school. All of her arguments can be countered with counter-assertions - so seems to me that her piece is pretty worthless. I wouldn't have published it.