responsibility

Jose? Think again lying nut-job.

Liar this is what The Commission said about Sharon nothing about him never again holding office:

We have found, as has been detailed in this report, that the Minister of Defense bears personal responsibility. In our opinion, it is fitting that the Minister of Defense draw the appropriate personal conclusions arising out of the defects revealed with regard to the manner in which he discharged the duties of his office - and if necessary, that the Prime Minister consider whether he should exercise his authority under Section 21-A(a) of the Basic Law: the Government, according to which "the Prime Minister may, after informing the Cabinet of his intention to do so, remove a minister from office."

"The Kahan commission found that Ariel Sharon bears personal responsibility,[30] recommended his dismissal from the post of Defense Minister and concluded that Sharon should not hold public office again....."

Source????

Banacek don't bother this is the official transcript of the report

http://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/Foreign%20Relations/Israels%20Foreign%20Relati...

I suggest you read the recommendations and stop quoting from made up "recommendations"

Regardless of what the details of the recommendations were, the findings were crystal clear. I am incredulous, that such a man then went on to become the Prime Minister of a modern, supposedly civilized country.

Let's see regardless of whether it was a lie it was ok to say it - seems to be par for the course for you RRZ and Banacek.

Problem for you AJ is the crystal clear reason why the Kahan Commission recommended his removal from the post of Defence Minister and his non direct -culpability for what happened.

It is our view that responsibility is to be imputed to the Minister of Defense for having disregarded the danger of acts of vengeance and bloodshed by the Phalangists against the population of the refugee camps, and having failed to take this danger into account when he decided to have the Phalangists enter the camps. In addition, responsibility is to be imputed to the Minister of Defense for not ordering appropriate measures for preventing or reducing the danger of massacre as a condition for the Phalangists' entry into the camps. These blunders constitute the non-fulfillment of a duty with which the Defense Minister was charged.

We do not believe that responsibility is to be imputed to the Defense Minister for not ordering the removal of the Phalangists from the camps when the first reports reached him about the acts of killing being committed there. As was detailed above, such reports initially reached the Defense Minister on Friday evening; but at the same time, he had heard from the Chief of Staff that the Phalangists' operation had been halted, that they had been ordered to leave the camps and that their departure would be effected by 5:00 a.m. Saturday. These preventive steps might well have seemed sufficient to the Defense Minister at that time, and it was not his duty to order additional steps to be taken, or to have the departure time moved up, a step which was of doubtful feasibility.

I suggest you read the report before making unsupportable comments about Israel.

Sharon is Israel ?

G-d help us all.

The comment was directed against "a modern, supposedly civilized country" why don't you read what is written.

And Asinine Iris your imbecilic and infantile comments prove you are incapable of posting anything remotely intelligent - I understand Cif have openings you may fare better there.