Exclusive rights.
 | By JonOtway
May 29, 2011 | Share |
Ian Kramer
28 May, 2011 - 17:25
Rate this:
1 point
amber, millis DOES have exclusive rights here. When I posted details of how he had falsified 2 news reports, they were deleted by the Moderator. He is obviously a New Isarel Fund lackey, because everything he writes follows their policies.
How come "Ian Kramer" has exclusive rights to post after hours? This happened last week too.
COMMENTS
30 May, 2011 - 09:49 Rate this: 0 points | No, but other options are being discussed, Reiss. As in give him enough rope...Or, let's flush out the person who's giving him the codes. |
30 May, 2011 - 09:54 Rate this: 0 points | Telegramsam, I deny possession of any codes, or of any covert actions. |
30 May, 2011 - 09:56 Rate this: 0 points | So it must be the give-him-enough-rope option, Reiss. That is if you are to be believed. Big if, that. |
30 May, 2011 - 11:27 Rate this: 0 points | I don't know why you or others are obsessed by a T Rex song. But be that as it may, I express my own views. Unlike others here, I don't have an arm up my backside operating my lower jaw. |
30 May, 2011 - 15:48 Rate this: 0 points | Of course you don't - you do all your talking from your ... |
MORE FROM THIS AUTHOR
LATEST COMMENTS
- Jonathan Hoffman RE: Adieu Ken Livingstone
- happygoldfish RE: Andrew Dismore and Ken Livingstone
- Advis3r RE: Prisoners voting: time to ask who governs Britain (Express)
- happygoldfish RE: Prisoners voting: time to ask who governs Britain (Express)
- Advis3r RE: Prisoners voting: time to ask who governs Britain (Express)
Ian Kramer
30 May, 2011 - 09:45
Rate this:
Have you seriously not considered the possibility that the JC considers my contributions as valuable enough that they should not be limited - as opposed to yours?