Statement regarding Board of Deputies International Division yesterday


By Jonathan Hoffman
March 15, 2011
Share

I have been called today by journalists from both the JC and the JN about what happened at yesterday's International Division of the Board. It seems that someone has breached confidentiality. i therefore consider that I have the right to set the record straight.

I hear from a journalist that I have been suspended for a week. I am horrified and disgusted that the Board sees fit to tell the Press about my suspension before they tell me.

What happened at yesterday’s International Division meeting is the following.

Unrelated to what had gone before (I am not prepared to breach confidentiality further than this) and without justification, the Chair (Paul Edlin) accused me of being offensive to him and others ("some of your exchanges of emails have been very vexating and upsetting"). One Deputy was so incensed at this unsubstantiated and unprompted slur that he walked out in protest. Another Deputy protested in the meeting at this attempt to smear and humiliate me. I then walked out but returned after a couple of minutes. As I entered the room I said to the Chair "one more time and you’ve had it” meaning “abuse me without ground and in public one more time and I will take it further and go public” - at which point I was thrown out by the Chair. Mine was a perfectly justified response to bullying and the abuse of power.

I challenge Edlin to produce the "vexating and upsetting" emails as a comment to this blog, so that people can make their own judgment.

I am getting used to being smeared by some communal leaders. In November 2009 Jerry Lewis accused me in the JC of “damaging both Israel’s case and beyond". (To this day, not a single member of the Board’s Executive has disassociated from this comment!). I take it as a badge of honour that they think I am worth smearing.

Certain communal leaders do not like my dedicated Israel activism, the fact that everything I do is done from a basis of knowledge and thought and the fact that I am not afraid to rock the boat where necessary. So be it. I believe that their response is partly due to the fact that I show up their ineffectiveness: they defend by attacking. As Churchill said "if you made an enemy it shows you stood up for something". My record stands for itself, eg being instrumental in the Bathurst-Norman case. (When as a result of my obtaining and analysing his summing–up in the EDO case in Brighton, the Office for Judicial Complaints censured Judge Bathurst-Norman for anti-Israel bias).

Let others be judged on their record too.

Let's look at the verdict of my effectiveness from the estimable veteran advocate Isi Leibler, formerly of Australia, now of Israel.

http://wordfromjerusalem.com/

More than anyone else, he was responsible for turning around the standing of Israel in Australia.
Leibler wrote in the Jerusalem Post in 2009 lamenting the 'erosion and marginalisation of most Diaspora Zionist organisations, with a few notable exceptions.' I asked him if the UK ZF was one of his exceptions.

I quote Leibler's response with permission: "For many years the UK ZF was low profile and inconsequential. It is only in recent times since you and a few others stood up to the trembling Israelites purporting to lead the Jewish community that it became one of the exceptions I mentioned"

COMMENTS

Joe Millis

15 March, 2011 - 17:56

Rate this:

3 points

So, Jonathan, have you been given a yellow card or not? And don't you think that, perhaps, your behaviour might have contributed a tinsey-winsey bit towards this?
Take the week off to calm down a bit and reflect on what has happened.


J.Clifford

15 March, 2011 - 18:13

Rate this:

-2 points

The Shah Shtill brigade are at it again defensive and completely out of touch! No one can accuse Jonathan Hoffman of being inactive nor can they accuse him of not being passionate. He is effective and productive always courageous turning out for Israel at demonstrations and hostile meetings. The worst thing they could say about him is that he is a loose cannon (whatever that means.)

Hold a mirror up to those who would malign him - inactive, lacking passion, ineffective, cowardly and unproductive. Add to that divisive and covertly hostile and that explains the low profile and inconsequantial standing of our "leaders" that Isi Leibler refers to.


Lukas

18 March, 2011 - 12:21

Rate this:

0 points

Don't worry. You can always go as Yoni 1

POST A COMMENT

You must be logged in to post a comment.