More on UJS ....


By Jonathan Hoffman
April 4, 2012
Share

Last Sunday (1 April) was the UJS Student Awards dinner in London.

I have it on good authority that UJS Officers from the platform (Dan Sheldon and also reportedly Emily Black) slandered me and the ZF (which sponsors one of the awards at the Dinner). One of them said that the ZF was not present at the ceremony due to their attendance at an EDL rally (in fact as they knew the relevant ZF staff were abroad organising a youth seminar)

The other called StandWithUs leaders of the 'hilltop youth'.

These comments may have been made in jest but they are in disgustingly bad taste.

If anyone was at the event and would like to tell me more please get in touch. Anonymity guaranteed.

Dan Sheldon of course has form:

http://cifwatch.com/2011/11/23/how-to-most-effectively-advocate-for-isra...

Over 100 called for his sacking after his slandering of me in October:
http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/sheldonout/

If he made these comments last Sunday, he is guilty of appalling judgment and must surely go now.

Jewish students deserve better than leaders whose idea of ‘Israel activism’ is to slander those who are in the front line.

Postscript:

In response to a complaint from the ZF Chairman, Dan Sheldon apologised for the comments made on Sunday night:

Although the comments were not made by me, I'd like to personally apologise, and on behalf of UJS, for any offence caused – it was certainly not our intention to show disrespect to the ZF. The humour was intended to be a satirical comment based on the events of the past few months.

In a second email he wrote:

I should have been explicit in my previous email – of course our apology extends to Jonathan and all at the ZF

Public slur, private apology .... pathetic

COMMENTS

joshua789

Wed, 04/04/2012 - 14:28

Rate this:

-2 points

' . . . slander those who are in the front line'.

You are referring to yourself we presume?


Jon.

Wed, 04/04/2012 - 15:22

Rate this:

-3 points

Jonathan. Given your history of naming and shaming people can you really be trusted when you write 'anonymity guaranteed.'?


amber

Wed, 04/04/2012 - 15:33

Rate this:

0 points

Joshua, what do you do for Israel advocacy?


amber

Wed, 04/04/2012 - 15:34

Rate this:

1 point

Jon, goven your history of anti-Israel invective, it is clear where you're coming from.


Stephen Franklin

Wed, 04/04/2012 - 15:36

Rate this:

1 point

Those in the front line clearly means, in this context, the leadership of the ZF and StandWithUs, and of course that includes Jonathan as Vice-President of the ZF.

Jonathan puts himself in the front line more than most.


Jon.

Wed, 04/04/2012 - 15:37

Rate this:

0 points

Hey Amber.

Could you point me toward some of that anti-Israel invective? I'd be keen to read some of these things I've supposedly been writing.


Jon.

Wed, 04/04/2012 - 15:50

Rate this:

-1 points

I mean. Its important to be able to back up these kind of assertions right? Otherwise its just slander.....


amber

Wed, 04/04/2012 - 16:00

Rate this:

1 point

Jon. - then why do you slander Israel? And what is your personal grope with Jonathan?

Funny how those who dish it out have such glass jaws...


amber

Wed, 04/04/2012 - 16:01

Rate this:

2 points

gripe - and no that wasn't a Freudian slip


Jon.

Wed, 04/04/2012 - 16:10

Rate this:

-1 points

Hi Amber.

Where have I slandered Israel? Can you cite one example please?

Thanks.


J.Clifford

Wed, 04/04/2012 - 16:43

Rate this:

1 point

Dan Sheldon is not doing himself or the UJS any favours by slandering Jonathan in this way. Having been forced to apologize previously for linking Jonathan and the EDL by repeating it proves just how disingenuous he is.

What sort of an example is this to set for our children who are at University?


joshua789

Wed, 04/04/2012 - 16:49

Rate this:

-1 points

Jon: 'I mean. It’s important to be able to back up these kind of assertions right? Otherwise its just slander.....'

We know that Jonathan's - AKA Amber's - whole modus operandi is slander and badmouthing.

Jonathan - AKA Amber - only ever posts slanderous content, making wild accusations without any qualification (other than the, like, impartial Harry's Place) I am sure this is why the JC permits him to post. Because then he can spew out invective and slander without the JC being liable.


Real Real Zionist

Wed, 04/04/2012 - 17:06

Rate this:

-1 points

This is too funny.

" You couldn't make it up "

I can see it on the billboards now.

" vote for Front line Jonny "


Jon.

Wed, 04/04/2012 - 17:08

Rate this:

0 points

Not going to get caught up in bickering about Dan Sheldon, or Jon Hoffman on this one.

Amber, you have made a slanderous accusation about me now back it up. The point is that opinion needs to be supported by fact. Jonathan has accused Dan Sheldon of slander. Amber has accused me of a "history of anti-Israel invective" with no evidence produced in either case.

Amber: I see you commenting on other threads so its clear you're about. Show me evidence or retract your comment.

PS @Joshua. I may be mistaken but I believe the JC is liable for anything written on this site - hence the moderation.


Real Real Zionist

Wed, 04/04/2012 - 17:23

Rate this:

0 points

"Hundreds called for his sacking after his slandering of me in October:"

Don't you have to have at least two of something to have a plurality ?

You are lying again Jonny boy.

But while we are on the subject, did anyone ever clear up the mystery of what happened to the original signature No.94 ?


JC Webmaster

Wed, 04/04/2012 - 17:44

Rate this:

0 points

Comments for this page are now closed.

LATEST COMMENTS