#BDS Fail in Brighton
![]() | By Jonathan Hoffman
November 10, 2012 | Share |
There were only 4 interruptions of Batsheva's brilliant performance last night and all the cultural hooligans were loudly booed and yanked out onto the street commendably quickly by the security staff. I can't wait to see Batsheva in London. The reviews have been great so please buy your tickets if you have not already done so -- cultural hooligans excepted of course.
From today's Brighton Argus (page 5, columns 1-4, with photo - not in online edition)
Double protests outside Dome over Israeli dance performance
A large group of pro-israel supporters gatecrashed a planned protest outside the Brighton Dome last night. Pro-Palestinian campaigners had arranged to picket the performance of controversial dance group the Batsheva ensemble. But unknown to them, their opposite numbers had arranged a counter-demo, outnumbering the original protest. Ann Hallam from the Brighton Palestine Solidarity group said "We are boycotting the group's performance because they are part of Brand Israel. They are a state-funded group which is sent around the world to portray Israel as a cultured and vibrant place while ignoring the atrocities and persecution of the Palestinians."
And 60-70 pro-Israel supporters outshouted the 40-50 strong opposed as a line of police officers watched.
The dance group was originally set for two dates but Dome bosses pulled the second event in order to improve security. Evan Sorokin from the Sussex Jewish Representative Council said "whatever the rights and wrongs, politics should not interfere with art"
COMMENTS
Mon, 11/12/2012 - 12:29 Rate this: 3 points | Jonathan, I can't find the Argus article you refer to anywhere on the Argus web site. My friend can't find it in hard copy paper either. I sure would like to read the whole thing. Would you kindly post a link, please? Don't get yourself into trouble over this, your lunch break will do fine. |
Mon, 11/12/2012 - 14:25 Rate this: -1 points |
|
Mon, 11/12/2012 - 15:16 Rate this: 1 point | The Albert Hall make it clear that they will not allow flags on a particular evening. A young yob in a hoodie smuggles a flag into the Hall and waves it provocatively in the faces of those he regards as his foes. You would call that hooliganism. The fact that it was done by a middle aged alleged grown-up "pillar of the community" doesn't make it less so. Nor does bragging about it afterwards. Yes, you are right. I am about as interested in which of 2 parochial sand pit squabbling cults shouts the loudest on a particular occasion as I am in last Sunday's results in the Albanian basketball league. |
Mon, 11/12/2012 - 15:23 Rate this: -1 points | Especially for the fake Zionist: Tirana triumphs in the country as they edged Basket Kamza in three games. The Winner of the Regular Season swept the Final series 3-0. Source:http://www.eurobasket.com/Albania/basketball-League-A1_2011-2012.asp |
Mon, 11/12/2012 - 15:24 Rate this: 1 point | Jonathan you better buy more than one ticket. The Dome was barely half full. |
Mon, 11/12/2012 - 15:27 Rate this: 1 point | I do hope Jonathan will get around to providing me with this link. |
Mon, 11/12/2012 - 16:15 Rate this: 0 points | Zaheerayin - I have also done a search on the Argus website (I searched under Batsheva, Dome, 10th November) and I couldn't find the article quoted above either. Jonathan, could you put a link to the original article so we can read the whole article please? |
Mon, 11/12/2012 - 16:30 Rate this: 0 points | I found this on today's Argus though: http://www.theargus.co.uk/news/business/10028397.Quakers_call_for_boycot... perhaps one has to subscribe to read the article posted by Jonathan? Is that the case Jonathan? How do we read it? |
Mon, 11/12/2012 - 16:38 Rate this: -1 points | (zaheerayin: it's on page 5, columns 1-4, with a photo … but not yet in the online edition)
|
Mon, 11/12/2012 - 16:42 Rate this: 0 points | 'But not yet in on-line edition'. That makes sense now. Thanks for the clarification HappyGoldfish. |
Mon, 11/12/2012 - 16:52 Rate this: 1 point | I teared up when I heard President Obama talk in his re-election speech about moving beyond war, "to shape a peace that is built on the promise of freedom and dignity for every human being." He articulated beautifully the hopes and dreams of people of every faith and nation-- including Palestinians, who have lived under occupation and repression for too long. But it must be built on fairness. I believe President Obama understands what must be done to reach a just resolution —but he failed to act because of domestic politics and threats by Israel Lobby groups. And yet, after Tuesday’s election, I’m more energized than ever. That’s because we know that Obama’s re-election is a chance to re-set our course on Israel and Palestine. The political calculus has changed and many of those threats turned out to be empty. And the terms of debate are changing every day. What was impossible yesterday becomes possible today. But we must act together and we must act fast. The inauguration is only a few months away and we want to send a strong message that we will deliver in person. Will you sign this open Letter to President Obama asking him to make sure US aid to Israel is conditioned on compliance with US and international law? Click here: http://www.ObamaLetter.org We've put together a growing coalition of Jews, Christians, Muslims and human rights and solidarity activists all asking President Obama for one thing—to make sure aid to Israel doesn't violate US laws which specifically prohibit assistance to any country which engages in a consistent pattern of human rights violations. By delivering thousands of your signatures to President Obama by his inauguration we can send the message that no aid should ever be unconditional. Click here: http://www.ObamaLetter.org With gratitude, Cecilie Surasky |
Mon, 11/12/2012 - 17:01 Rate this: 0 points | That is easy. Argus articles that appear online ( all of them ordinarily, at least on a search )are available for comment ( like a blog post ). This has been kept offline so that its content can't be challenged. It might be due to the influence of a certain editor who has just returned from an all expenses paid jolly to Israel ( courtesy of Sodastream.) Otherwise happy it begins with a Y and ends with an N.If you think the Albert Hall has a racist policy in respect of flags then we can't take your use of the expression " racist" seriously. I never have anyway since you degrade the force of the expression by scattering it around like confetti. They knew they had a disruption issue on their hands and could foresee a battle of the flags compounding their problem. The ban applied to all flags, including Palestinian flags. Suppose Breton separatism was a hot issue and they knew that Breton separatists were planning to disrupt a performance by a French orchestra. Obviously a mass of competing tricolors and Breton flags would make the task of minimising disruption more difficult. I am sure they would have adopted the self same policy. I think this is just common sense. You can call it craven, and this would be arguable. But calling it racist only tells us that you are someone for whom a perception of racism is essential to your getting through the day. Of course none of this applied to our narcissistic man/child. |
Mon, 11/12/2012 - 18:26 Rate this: -1 points | Suzanna saw an interesting analysis of Obama's attitude today. That is he doesn't regard it as his job to prevent Israel committing suicide. If Israel is hell bent on one state he is not going to lie on the tracks to obstruct them. Nonetheless I have signed Cecilie's letter. |
Tue, 11/13/2012 - 12:06 Rate this: -1 points | It begins with a Y and ends with an N "So did it appear or not?" No it did not appear. Has to be something to do with a certain freeloading editor, particularly as it turns out that the account was garbage. Someone is on the case. |
Tue, 11/13/2012 - 12:33 Rate this: 1 point | No, RRZ, what I meant was: did appear in print, but not on line? If so, and according to the dictum that even a stopped clock is right twice a day, JH has indeed published of what the Argus said. |
Tue, 11/13/2012 - 14:52 Rate this: 0 points |
|
Tue, 11/13/2012 - 14:57 Rate this: 0 points |
You will be if you are not so innocuous as to act like a pratt. And that's the main point here. So if I were to go to a performance of, say, the Berlin Phil performing one of Beethoven's symphonies and waved a German flag overly energetically, I would be ejected. |
Tue, 11/13/2012 - 15:00 Rate this: 0 points | Joe I am not really concerned about Hoff here. His lying and dissembling is legendary and thoroughly documented. My interest is what is going on at the Argus. I know in outline but the detail will be eye opening I suspect. Like I say folks are on the case. |
Tue, 11/13/2012 - 15:22 Rate this: 0 points | Ha ha just seen JM'S last post. And of course the day Hoff is quiet and innocuous will be the day Hull City win the champions league. |
MORE FROM THIS AUTHOR
LATEST COMMENTS
- Ben F RE: Oxfam and the Board - what should happen if the red lines are crossed
- happygoldfish RE: SCoJeC and Board of Deputies respond to Church of Scotland revised report
- happygoldfish RE: SCoJeC and Board of Deputies respond to Church of Scotland revised report
- happygoldfish RE: SCoJeC and Board of Deputies respond to Church of Scotland revised report
- happygoldfish RE: MEMO 352

,





Real Real Zionist
Mon, 11/12/2012 - 12:04
Rate this:
YYYYYAAAAAAWWWWWWNNNNNNN
Except to say that the man who got thrown out of The Royal Albert Hall for hooliganism is not well placed to talk of " cultural hooligans ".