The games people play (when they're getting desperate)
![]() | By Joe Millis
June 22, 2011 | Share |
Reading the Jerusalem Post, I See some from the settler movement have become so desperate that they have invented a computer game (or should that be con-puter game?) that purports to show what would happen if Israel did the sensible thing and gave up on the West Bank.
The game first asks you to pick a Samaria settlement.
In the next frame it shows a photograph of the settlement with the words, “If the nightmarish dream of the radical left is fulfilled, this settlement won’t exist. Then what would happen?” The next frame shows two terrorists with a missile aimed at Israeli cities from that settlement. The user can chose whether they want a Grad or a Kassam missile, then press a red button and send the missile flying.
A message then appears on the screen: “If there are Jews in Samaria, there won’t be missiles in Kfar Saba.”
This is, of course, a fallacious nonsense, since of any of the toxic settlements continue to exist, Israel won't. In short, it's either settlements or Kfar Saba, you cannot have both.
It seems that Netanyahu is at last getting the message too.
To the dismay of pro-settler elements in his government, such as Limor Livnat-Habala, Uzi "Dr Strangelove" Landau as well as Danny Ayaloon, when Netanyahu said the number of Palestinians and Jews between the Jordan River and the sea "is irrelevant" and that it's more important to "preserve a solid Jewish majority inside the State of Israel."
The prime minister cut short the discussion and surprised those present with previously unspoken sentiments about the future Israeli presence in the West Bank.
"The debate over how many Jews and how many Palestinians will be between the Jordan and the sea is irrelevant," Netanyahu said. "It does not matter to me whether there are half a million more Palestinians or less because I have no wish to annex them into Israel. I want to separate from them so that they will not be Israeli citizens. I am interested that there be a solid Jewish majority inside the State of Israel. Inside its borders, as these will be defined," Netanyahu explained.
The settlers are good at playing games or calling their adversaries "Nazis". But they've contributed nothing to Israel. In fact, the settlements' toxicity has poisoned the debate between Jews in and outside of Israel.
COMMENTS
22 June, 2011 - 09:12 Rate this: -1 points | Simonq, neither the settlers nor the soldiers who unfortunately have to defend them are Nazis. The only Nazis are those who wear brown or black shirts, swastikas and believe in the superiority of their race. |
22 June, 2011 - 09:13 Rate this: 1 point | Ha Ha Millis you obviously haven't read this.http://spectator.org/archives/2011/06/08/the-economics-of-settlement/print - read it and weep! |
22 June, 2011 - 09:29 Rate this: -1 points | Advis3r, so you want to bring about the demise of Israel. It's either the settlements or Israel as a democratic Jewish state. You can't have both. |
22 June, 2011 - 09:32 Rate this: 1 point | Millis your remonstration with simonq was too late the genie is already out. Rather than displacing Palestinians, the Israeli occupation of the West Bank stimulated substantial growth and improvement in their lives. The approximately 1,000,000 Arabs living in the West Bank and Gaza Strip in 1967 grew to a bit more than 3,000,000 in 1994. It has been often noted that when an Israeli settlement was erected, areas around it that were hitherto uninhabited became sites for Palestinian shops selling agricultural goods and cottage industry wares to the Israelis. Later, Palestinian houses followed the shops. Later still, the PLO succeeded in creating excellent anti-Israel photo-ops from this process. The PLO paid Palestinians to build homes abutting the settlement. The photo-op was the image of a settlement encroaching upon the Palestinian home. When the Israeli government tried to intervene, the photo-op was the Israeli government destroying a Palestinian home. Arab propaganda argues that the settlements are an obstacle to peace. However: 1. From 1949-1967 there were no settlements in the West Bank or Gaza Strip. Nor was there peace. Arab belligerence was unrelated to West Bank and Gaza settlements. The settlements to which the Arabs objected at that time were Tel Aviv, Haifa, Hadera, Afula, etc. |
22 June, 2011 - 09:36 Rate this: -1 points | Between the River and the Sea, there are more non-Jews controlled by Israel than Jews. The only ones blind to the deleterious affect of this are Lemur Livnat-Habala, Danny Ayaloon and other supporters of the toxic enterprise. Bibi gets it. Maybe one day, hopefully before it's too late for Israel, the Israeli population will stop acquiescing in the suicidal stupidity of supporting a few swivel-eyed messianists. |
22 June, 2011 - 10:11 Rate this: 0 points | millis, your last point is nonsense. The number of Jews and Arabs between the Jordan river and the Med will not change whatever Israel's borders. Better that Israel is in a position of strength than one of weakness. Who exactly is Israel supposed to give Judea and Samaria to? |
22 June, 2011 - 10:19 Rate this: -1 points | Amber, that great anti-Zionist Binyamin Netanyahu disagrees with you.
But than again you probably think he's some kind of anti-semitic anti-zionist. |
22 June, 2011 - 10:23 Rate this: 0 points | millis, as you ignored the substantive point, I'll ask again: who is Israel supposed to give Judea and Samaria to? |
22 June, 2011 - 10:24 Rate this: 0 points | I agree with Netanyahu - doesn't alter the fact that there are still the same number of Jews and Arabs in the area despite borders, nor does it change the fact that Israel has no peace partner. |
22 June, 2011 - 10:26 Rate this: 0 points | Millis he could equally have been speaking heaven forefend about the "T" word! |
22 June, 2011 - 10:28 Rate this: 0 points | Israel, for its own sake, should hand over control of the West Bank to the Palestinians. If you do not understand what Netanyahu means by saying "It does not matter to me whether there are half a million more Palestinians or less because I have no wish to annex them into Israel. I want to separate from them so that they will not be Israeli citizens. I am interested that there be a solid Jewish majority inside the State of Israel. Inside its borders, as these will be defined,", then very little can help you. |
22 June, 2011 - 10:30 Rate this: 0 points | Moderator, why are the one-stater anti-Zionists, like Advis3r and Amber, allowed to post on a pro-Israel website? I didn't think doing Hamas's work for it would be allowed here. |
22 June, 2011 - 10:43 Rate this: 0 points | "This is, of course, a fallacious nonsense, since of any of the toxic settlements continue to exist, Israel won't." That's what they told us before they uprooted the Jewish communities in Gaza. Result thousands of rockets on Southern Israeli cities. Wasn't it Einstein who stated that performing the same tasks and expecting different results is the definition of insanity? |
22 June, 2011 - 10:45 Rate this: 0 points | That's it Millis usual extreme left wing tactic try to close down debate when it's not going your way - absolutely pathetic as are you. |
22 June, 2011 - 10:49 Rate this: 0 points | millis, brilliant! What an intellect you are. Israel should hand it to "the Palestininas". Whic ones millis? Fatah, led by the Holocaust denying Abbas who is currenhtly refusing to negotiate and who has just been taken over by Hamas? Or Hamas itself, which advocates the extermination of the Jews, and would launch more terror and rocket attacks from land vacated by Israel, as we saw in Gaza? What a brain youu have. |
22 June, 2011 - 10:51 Rate this: 0 points | Moderator, why are self-loathing Jews like millis alowed to post here? |
22 June, 2011 - 10:59 Rate this: 0 points | So, Advis3r, why did Israel build so many settlements if it knew that they contribute nothing to Israel. That's what Einstein really meant about repeating the same thing. And the rockets were fired from Gaza even before the Israelis unilaterally withdrew to bury the peace process (put it in formaldehyde, as Weisglass said). So much for settlements preventing rockets. How about treating the Palestinians as equals? There's something the Israelis haven't tried yet. Who knows, it might work. |
22 June, 2011 - 11:05 Rate this: 0 points | And the Palestinians treat Jews as equals? What a moron. millis, you forgot to answer - Fatah or Hamas? Which is a real peace partner?And are they any different now Hamas has swallowed Fatah? This is who you trust for Israel's future? |
22 June, 2011 - 13:45 Rate this: 0 points | Millis - patently, you have no answer when it comes to living in reality. |
MORE FROM THIS AUTHOR
LATEST COMMENTS
- Jonathan Hoffman RE: Adieu Ken Livingstone
- happygoldfish RE: Andrew Dismore and Ken Livingstone
- Advis3r RE: Prisoners voting: time to ask who governs Britain (Express)
- happygoldfish RE: Prisoners voting: time to ask who governs Britain (Express)
- Advis3r RE: Prisoners voting: time to ask who governs Britain (Express)


simoneq
22 June, 2011 - 08:57
Rate this:
it is strange that the settlers should call their adversaries Nazis isn't it. Projecting just a little aren't they?