There must be a better way....
![]() | By Alan Melkman
February 6, 2011 | Share |
Often blogs comment on events that have occurred and then look at what might happen next. This one is different. It starts with what will happen in the future and then predicts what is likely to happen as a result and why it serves no real purpose.
Tonight Channel 4 airs the first of a four part series ‘The promise’. Judging by the advanced publicity and what I’ve been told it is about how the early idealistic efforts to re-establish a Jewish homeland turned into ethnic cleansing of the Arabs and worse by the Jews.
Now here’s where I predict the future. This website and many others sympathetic to the Israeli cause, as well as a small number of print media, will be full of rebuttals. Facts and logic will be paraded by Israel’s defendants.
Will it make a difference? Will anyone change their attitudes and beliefs? Generally, no! Of those in the general public who currently ‘sit on the fence’ a very small number will fall off into the anti Israeli camp but all the pro Israel arguments, so righteously paraded, will not change anybody’s mind.
If I’m right and if there is this avalanche of Israel defence then I will have more to say because just defending Israel doesn’t work; it doesn’t achieve its objective of reducing the deligitimisation, demonization and double standards applied to Israel. In fact things are getting worse. Even the Israeli government admits it is losing the battle for people’s minds.
There must be a better way! More to come………….
COMMENTS
6 February, 2011 - 20:17 Rate this: 0 points | It's Channel 4, innit, the deranged antisemites. Britain is turning rapidly into Der Stuermer. |
7 February, 2011 - 17:40 Rate this: 1 point | In my view last nights programme 'The Promise, was relatively balanced although it did not of course give the whole story. If it continues in this vein over the next three weeks then I, for one, will breath a sigh of relief. Somehow I don't think that will happen. Let's wait and see. |
jose (not verified) 7 February, 2011 - 18:05 Rate this: 2 points | I still wonder how a program that gives one extremist side of the story can be 'balanced'. Do you mean it showed extremists for what they are? Or did they just mention that they do not represent at all Israel's policy? |
9 February, 2011 - 17:24 Rate this: -2 points | Alan - "There must be a better way!" Jose is being honest in admitting she hasn't seen the programme and really wanting to know. I hope she'll watch the remaining instalments. |
jose (not verified) 9 February, 2011 - 17:50 Rate this: 3 points |
You mean the critics that do not count, Walinuts?
First, you have to realise that "Jose" is a male name. Maybe going out of England, to Spain for example, would help. |
10 February, 2011 - 16:04 Rate this: -2 points | Jose - I was giving you the benefit of the doubt. When you wrote "Couldn't view the program yet, so I really want to know", I believed you. |
jose (not verified) 10 February, 2011 - 16:18 Rate this: 3 points |
I really want to know what is the discourse of the author and if it is "balanced", Walinuts. Because it is difficult to believe that a documentary about religious nuts can lead to a 'balanced' opinion.
HAHAHA! Your ignorance of the hispanic world is abysmal, Walinuts. Who on Earth ignores that "Jose" is the hispanic name for "Joseph"? |
12 February, 2011 - 16:39 Rate this: 0 points | Gentlemen; Remember please, Jose & Stanley that 'The Promise' is a dramatic work of fiction. It is not a documentary. It should be judged firstly on its artistic merit and then whether it is fair. Let's wait for tomorrow night's episode and then comment on it rather than each other. |
jose (not verified) 12 February, 2011 - 17:05 Rate this: 1 point | Then how a fiction can change an opinion of historical facts? |
12 February, 2011 - 17:37 Rate this: 2 points | Walinets, how you have the temerity to turn up here again with your broken record of exclusively attackin Israel whilst whitewashing its tyrannical neighbours, having run away from challenging questions on the previous blog, is beyond chutzpah. |
jose (not verified) 12 February, 2011 - 17:53 Rate this: 2 points | Note that Walinuts never apologised for making the same kind of blood libel used in Czarist Russia, against Tsahal. |
12 February, 2011 - 18:18 Rate this: 0 points | "It is not a documentary. It should be judged firstly on its artistic merit" More thick drivel. An antisemitic piece of fiction is still antisemitic. |
13 February, 2011 - 11:44 Rate this: -2 points | Ah! I've just realised why it is I'm an utter anti-Semite and self-hater! It's because I don't scream the TRUTH loud enough. It's because I don't insist hysterically enough that anyone who see things differently to me is beneath contempt. Please forgive me, dear friends. I should have realised the true nature of truth long ago, and I thank you all for your revelations. Just one example of my utter stupidity - how could I, Walinuts, have been so unaware of my abysmal ignorance of the hispanic world that I ignore the fact that "Jose" is the hispanic name for "Joseph"? How I'm truly sorry, dear friends and fellow Jews. Please continue to scream TRUTH at me - the louder you shout, the sooner I will realise what truth is. And now - please may I watch episode two of 'The Promise', tonight? I assure you I'll cover my eyes and my ears the moment anything appears which I'd rather not see. Thank you. |
jose (not verified) 13 February, 2011 - 12:58 Rate this: 1 point |
Self-hater? For that, it would be necessary to think of yourself as a Jew, let alone a Zionist Jew. Nut antisemite hater, is the correct label for you.
Well whatever, Walinuts, it is obvious that you didn't even suspect that Jose was the Spanish version of Joseph or you would not have called me "she", would you? |
13 February, 2011 - 16:05 Rate this: -1 points | Dumb & dumber doing their double act again. |
14 February, 2011 - 11:11 Rate this: -2 points | jose: "Well whatever, Walinuts, it is obvious that you didn't even suspect that Jose was the Spanish version of Joseph or you would not have called me "she", would you?" Quite so, dear boy. And when I meet up with my son in Heaven I'll certainly tell him off for not teaching me the hispanic origins of 'Jose' before he so inconsiderately died. I'll give him your regards while I'm there, tell him how helpful you've been in this matter. By the way - are you Spanish? If not, I'm wondering why you prefer to disguise 'Joseph' as 'Jose'? Does Joseph sound to Jewish for you? |
14 February, 2011 - 11:19 Rate this: -3 points | A word in youu shell-like, Stanley. Don't rise to his bait. Jose and his alter-ego Yoni1 enjoy it too much. Just let him get on with it and ignore. |
14 February, 2011 - 11:20 Rate this: 2 points | Is there anybody on these blogs that you don't think is Jose's alter ego Millis? And you are a fine one to talk about alter-egos, as we all know. |
14 February, 2011 - 11:31 Rate this: -2 points | No Matt. You aren't, and Jonathan H isn't, as well as the anti-Zionists who obviously aren't. And I publish only under my own name. |
14 February, 2011 - 11:35 Rate this: -2 points | Mr Melkman - I duly watched the second episode of 'The Promise' last night. It was utterly moving and sad. And amazingly constructed and filmed, in the way it managed to show truths from EVERY side of this incredibly complex situation - how the Holocaust victims were in the right, the kicked-out Palestinians were in the right, even the British soldiers were doing what they thought was right; and how still the terrible situation drags on with no answers in sight - or at least, no answers that those in power are willing to contemplate.... |
14 February, 2011 - 11:39 Rate this: 2 points |
Now you do, yes. Which is why you've had to moderate your language, since you have a professional reputation to uphold. But your previous alter-ego had no such compunctions did he? I'm glad you took my advice Joe, now don't push your luck. Okay? |
14 February, 2011 - 11:44 Rate this: -3 points | I have no idea what you are talking about, Matt as I have had no previous alter-egos here. |
14 February, 2011 - 11:46 Rate this: 1 point | Of course you don't Joe. |
14 February, 2011 - 12:01 Rate this: 3 points | "the kicked-out Palestinians were in the right" It's the JEWS who were the Palestinians, thicko. And no, the Arabs who sought to murder all the Jews were no more 'in the right' than the Germans were 'in the right' in WW2. "even the British soldiers were doing what they thought was right" Only following orders, eh? |
jose (not verified) 14 February, 2011 - 12:27 Rate this: 0 points |
Poor Wallinuts, your idiocy has no limit. You wonder about delusions. "Jose" is my name in the civil records and is not "disguise". |
jose (not verified) 14 February, 2011 - 12:32 Rate this: 1 point |
I wonder how long that 'truth' would last if there was a small investigation of the IP addresses used by some pseudos, banned previously or not, Milligramsam! |
jose (not verified) 14 February, 2011 - 12:39 Rate this: 3 points |
Poor Wallinuts, there is mainly one answer that the 'Palestinians' never accepted: leave Israel to Israelis, and build their own country wherever they want to live. |
15 February, 2011 - 12:41 Rate this: -2 points | Oh dear Jose, you really aren't worth answering, with your endless ' ' around the word Palestine. You have no idea of history. Do you even know what the word 'history' means? |
15 February, 2011 - 13:24 Rate this: 2 points | "the kids at my elementary school, hearing I was a Jew, would shout "Get back to Palestine!"?" So the kids at your school thought "Palestine" was the Jewish homeland? Or did they think you were an Arab? |
Anonymous 15 February, 2011 - 13:27 Rate this: -1 points | Comments for this page are now closed. |
MORE FROM THIS AUTHOR
LATEST COMMENTS
- Jonathan Hoffman RE: Adieu Ken Livingstone
- happygoldfish RE: Andrew Dismore and Ken Livingstone
- Advis3r RE: Prisoners voting: time to ask who governs Britain (Express)
- happygoldfish RE: Prisoners voting: time to ask who governs Britain (Express)
- Advis3r RE: Prisoners voting: time to ask who governs Britain (Express)


jose (not verified)
6 February, 2011 - 17:52
Rate this:
Having 1500 million nearly automatic supporters is great help to convince people's mind, and especially politicians' mind because of the vote it represent.
Does it means they are right? There was a time where 'everybody' knew the Earth was flat. Were they right?
And what is the relationship between the Jewish hardline religious fanatics and Israel's policy?
Would a documentary on the BNP be a proof that UK policy is fascistic?