IDF Report into the fatal attack at Joseph's Tomb
![]() | By Advis3r
May 11, 2011 | Share |
An IDF investigation has concluded that 'Palestinian police' shot 44 bullets at mostly unarmed Israeli civilians in the April 24 incident in which Ben Yosef Livnat was murdered. The investigation has also concluded that at least one of the 'Palestinian police' was a terrorist who had been released from an Israeli jail.
A probe by the Judea and Samaria division of the IDF stated the attack at Joseph's Tomb was unwarranted, and the report did not rule out the possibility that it may have been a terrorist attack, Voice of Israel government radio reported. The soldiers shot with the intention to kill, according to the IDF.
The Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet) and police are conducting a further investigation to determine whether the shooting and murder were pre-meditated.
Israel National News reported last week that an internal Palestinian Authority probe contradicted initial claims that the PA soldiers shot at the worshippers because they allegedly broke through a PA checkpoint on their way home from the holy site.
The IDF report confirmed that the PA troops shot 44 bullets without any provocation and that there was no danger to their lives. Most, if not all, of the Jews were unarmed, contrary to claims disseminated by Palestinian Authority media.
At least two of the PA soldiers, commonly called “police” by mainstream media, were trained by American officers at an American-funded training base in Jordan.
The IDF report concluded the attack is a ”warning” of what may await Jews this summer and also serves as a caution sign concerning further cooperation with the PA security forces.
COMMENTS
12 May, 2011 - 14:39 Rate this: 0 points | I called my good friend Bibi about this and he thinks I'm nuts. |
12 May, 2011 - 16:07 Rate this: 0 points | The only people I know who call the Voice of Israel government radio are those who want to besmirch the country, as if it has a government-controlled radio like the former USSR, Iran or other authoritarian states. Says an awful lot about the poster of this blog. |
13 May, 2011 - 09:28 Rate this: 0 points | Says it all really the only thing that gets these people upset is the misplacement of the word "government" the fact that one of the so-called troops was a former terrorist or that over 40 shots were fired at an unarmed civilian car does not overly concern them presumably because the occupants were Jews. |
13 May, 2011 - 09:41 Rate this: 0 points | Adviser, precisely. That point seems to have escaped the haters. |
13 May, 2011 - 09:55 Rate this: 0 points | You two keep getting yourselves so tangled in that web of deceit. Nobody's falling for it "advis3r" and jonathamber. |
13 May, 2011 - 10:03 Rate this: 0 points | Yep Joe's nobody's fool, but I could be wrong. But just for argument's sake are you not upset to learn that this was an unprovoked attack on a civilian car, whether or not they should have been there without prior co-ordination? |
13 May, 2011 - 10:28 Rate this: 0 points | Was it unprovoked, "advis3r"? Goodness, next time some tries to run an Israeli checkpoint I'm sure the " unprovoked" excuse will be used. These people have been led to believe they are above the law. They entered amilitary zone without coordination as Israeli law requires. They ran a checkpoint. Warning shots were fired first as the PA police had been taught by the Israelis. And only after were lethal shots fired. And how were the PA police supposed to knows the passengers therein were unarmed? X-ray vision perhaps? After all, settlers, even if the PA police could see them in their speeding cars, are not averse to going equipped. |
13 May, 2011 - 10:58 Rate this: 0 points | I do not know what report you read Millis but the facts are not as you say. I would preface what I have to say by saying that it was foolhardy in the extreme to attempt to enter what is now a closed area I have said this before. |
13 May, 2011 - 11:17 Rate this: 0 points | It was the initial army report, not the one doctored for political experience. They broke the law, because they thought they were above it. It is tragic that a young man paid with his life because of this attitude, "advis3r". |
13 May, 2011 - 12:11 Rate this: 0 points | Also, they were Breslavers. And what kind of kippah do Breslavers wear? That's right, as you might have seen in pictures of them, they were a large, white knitted job, very similar to those skullcaps worn by Islamic fundamentalists. |
MORE FROM THIS AUTHOR
LATEST COMMENTS
- Jonathan Hoffman RE: Adieu Ken Livingstone
- happygoldfish RE: Andrew Dismore and Ken Livingstone
- Advis3r RE: Prisoners voting: time to ask who governs Britain (Express)
- happygoldfish RE: Prisoners voting: time to ask who governs Britain (Express)
- Advis3r RE: Prisoners voting: time to ask who governs Britain (Express)



JonOtway
12 May, 2011 - 14:34
Rate this:
voice of israel government radio
what the hell is that ?
Who else has had access to this report.