Demographics and the Long-Term Israeli Victory


By Advis3r
May 25, 2011
Share

Yaakov Lozowick (http://yaacovlozowick.blogspot.com/2011/05/demographics-and-long-term-is...) has this compelling story about how Millis 's threats that the Jews are going to obe overrun by Palestinian Arabs is a whole load of hogwash. It was in any event based on a discredited Palestinian Census which fraudulantly inflated Palestinaian Arab population numbers and birth projections in Judea and Samaria.

Barry Meislin has uncovered an article in the Asia Times (of Hong Kong) that takes a very long look. So long, as a matter of fact, that none of us will be alive to test his full thesis, which deals with the year 2100. Yet the demographic trends he discusses will be felt - or not, if he's wrong - well before the end of the century, demographic developments being what they are.
Like the vanishing point in a perspective painting, long-term projections help us order our perceptions of what we see in front of us today. Here's one to think about, fresh from the just-released update of the United Nations' population forecasts: At constant fertility, Israel will have more young people by the end of this century than either Turkey or Iran, and more than German, Italy or Spain.
With a total fertility rate of three children per woman, Israel's total population will rise to 24 million by the end of the present century. Iran's fertility is around 1.7 and falling, while the fertility for ethnic Turks is only 1.5 (the Kurdish minority has a fertility rate of around 4.5).
Not that the size of land armies matters much in an era of high-tech warfare, but if present trends continue, Israel will be able to field the largest land army in the Middle East. That startling data point, though, should alert analysts to a more relevant problem: among the military powers in the Middle East, Israel will be the only one with a viable population structure by the middle of this century.
That is why it is in America's interest to keep Israel as an ally. Israel is not only the strongest power in the region; in a generation or two it will be the only power in the region, the last man standing among ruined neighbors. The demographic time bomb in the region is not the Palestinian Arabs on the West Bank, as the Israeli peace party wrongly believed, but rather Israel itself.
The key part of the article is this:
The right way to read this projection is backwards: Israelis love children and have lots of them because they are happy, optimistic and prosperous. Most of Israel's population increase comes from so-called "secular" Israelis, who have 2.6 children on average, more than any other people in the industrial world. The ultra-Orthodox have seven or eight, bringing total fertility to three children.
Europeans, Turks and Iranians, by contrast, have very few children because they are grumpy, alienated and pessimistic. It's not so much the projection of the demographic future cranked out by the United Nations computers that counts, but rather the implicit vision of the future in the minds of today's prospective parents.
And then this:
This, I believe, explains the implacable hostility of Israel's neighbors, as well as the Europeans. It is the unquenchable envy of the dying towards the living. Having failed at Christianity, and afterward failed at neo-pagan nationalism, Europe has reconciled itself to a quiet passage into oblivion.
Israel's success is a horrible reminder of European failure; its bumptious nationalism grates against Europe's determination to forget its own ugly embrace of nationalism; and its implicitly religious raison d'etre provokes post-Christian rage. Above all, it offends Europe that Israel brims with life. Some of Europe's great nations may not survive the present century. At constant fertility, Israel will have more citizens than any of the Eastern European countries where large numbers of Jews resided prior to the Holocaust.
From there on it gets better. Read the whole thing, if only to raise your spirits. By the time he either gets proved/disproved we won't be here to notice anyway.
Read the rest here http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/ME24Ak01.html?sms_ss=facebook&a...

COMMENTS

simoneq

25 May, 2011 - 08:11

Rate this:

1 point

Israel's success is a horrible reminder of European failure;
SUCCESS?

No European nation what tolerate the absolute racism that exists in your beloved Israel.


Advis3r

25 May, 2011 - 08:39

Rate this:

-1 points

Yes I can make statements like simonq is an anti-Israel bigot but at least I have evidence to back up my assertion.


StevenKalka

25 May, 2011 - 13:30

Rate this:

0 points

"No European nation what tolerate the absolute racism that exists in your beloved Israel."

That's why Europe is being overrun with unassimilated immigrants being allowed to march in street shouting
"Death to the west".

Simoneq, you can continue to live in your fool's paradise. I'll live elsewhere.


Yoni

25 May, 2011 - 14:02

Rate this:

-1 points

"No European nation what tolerate the absolute racism that exists in your beloved Israel"

More garbage. The UK is swimming in antisemitism, which is racism.


JonOtway

25 May, 2011 - 14:33

Rate this:

0 points

Steven you seem to be saying that Israel is an absolutely racist state. I hope I'm wrong


JC Webmaster

25 May, 2011 - 14:35

Rate this:

0 points

This comment by JonOtway has been moderated


StevenKalka

26 May, 2011 - 14:55

Rate this:

0 points

JonOtway, I was only quoting comments from Simoneq and don't believe Israel to be a racist state. That's why I placed double quotes around the first sentence of my post. The rest of the post was a rebuttal of Simoneq's statement
"No European nation what tolerate the absolute racism that exists in your beloved Israel."

If you're a dyed in the wool leftist, racism is only from westerners to non-westerners, and can never go the other way, so they ignore shouts of "death to the west" from muslims.

I think the term racism is so overused. It should only be used apply to laws mandating unequal treatment by race based on racial superiority. In Israel, security checkpoints are not based on any racial superiority doctrines. In any case, arabs are semites themselves.

People on the left engage in such rhetorical overkill, as if they think that will intimidate their opponents into submission. It's sort of like Goebbel's Big Lie technique. Tell a big lie often enough, and it becomes gospel.

POST A COMMENT

You must be logged in to post a comment.