Anti-Israel racists on the JC Website


By Advis3r
February 13, 2012
Share

Some bloggers on this website believe they know what anti-Semitism is - the EUMC working definition is an inconvenience and nuisance for them because so convinced are they that there is not a racist bone in their body the mere fact that holding Israel to a standard no other country is held to or calling a sizeable proportion of its citizens "scum" surely cannot be racist or so they argue. So not content with denigrating Israel they denigrate the definition and engage in verbal gymnastics in order to salve their consciences.

However they should be aware that British law recognises that national groups can be subject to racism: in Section III of the Public Order Act 1986 “racial hatred” is defined as “hatred against a group of persons in Great Britain defined by reference to colour, race, nationality (including citizenship) or ethnic or national origins.”

Whilst it may be on occasion when they attempt to delegitimise Israel they mean Israel the “state” or “country”, not the Israeli people since the name of a country is often used in place of its government in most cases it is obvious that they mean Israel, its government, people and perceived national character. Talking totally out of context about so-called "Shared values" is just one example of this.

These bloggers believe themselves to be anti-racist, but think nothing of denying to an Israeli the idea that they have a national identity. Whilst they have no problem accepting that it is possible to harbour racist views about French people, or Americans, or Nigerians, or, for that matter, Palestinians, they deny it is possible to harbour racist views about Israelis on whom it is open season.

It seems anti-Israel racism is alive and well and thriving on the JC Website.

COMMENTS

Mary in Brighton

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 09:24

Rate this:

0 points

Hysterical rants are us. And please do make up your mind. In a recent thread you went to great lengths to explain to us that Israelis are not a race.

Do you not have jcwatch for this kind of rabid rubbish ?


Real Real Zionist

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 10:03

Rate this:

0 points

He can't make his mind up, he hasn't got one. He makes it all up as he goes along.


Advis3r

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 10:25

Rate this:

0 points

Ah you see that is where we differ I am open to new ideas whereas you two are so closed minded that you are unable to accept anybody's opinion unless it confirms your own narrow agenda.

Having read the exchange between Goldfish and Phoney Zionist I researched "anti-Israeli racism" and found that although no doubt you will both deny its existence (it didn't take long for both of you to prove me right) because it provides another inconvenient truth to what you both do on this website, the phenomenom does exist and both of you are prime proponents.


Goldie G. Tobin

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 11:22

Rate this:

0 points

The only racists I've noticed around here are racist Jewish supremacists.


Advis3r

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 11:33

Rate this:

0 points

Since you used the term what do you mean by "racist Jewish Supremacist"? I only ask because it is something David Duke uses quite a bit and we all know what he is.


happygoldfish

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 11:34

Rate this:

0 points

Goldie Tobin: The only racists I've noticed around here are racist Jewish supremacists.

by "supremacist" do you mean someone who believes that jews are superior to non-jews?

if so, where do you claim that anyone here has said that?


Mary in Brighton

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 11:53

Rate this:

0 points

Oh come on happygoldfish the site is brim full of unfavourable comparisons between Arabs and Jews, Advsr and Harvey prominent among the culprits. Not to mention frequent reference to Jewish " sovereignty " and Jewish " rule".


Advis3r

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 12:52

Rate this:

0 points

Mary you are quite a one aren't you - please point to any post I have put on this website where I have made an unfavourable comparison between Arabs and Jews which could in any way be dubbed racist or supremacist - you made the allegation now back it up.

Whereas yesterday I posted a poll about Jews being confident that even if Israel retained rule over Judea and Samaria it would still remain democratic and what was your response?

Then again I posted a piece about Arab and Jewish co-operation and what was your response - "Yuk".

Disingenuous is your middle name.


Mary in Brighton

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 12:59

Rate this:

0 points

Not exactly. My yuk response was to your gut wrenching piece about Migron. Do pay attention.

You don't generally " say " it you link to sites that say it. I am not going trawling through your multitude of links. Rather I will keep a notebook in the future. It won't take me long to fill it.


happygoldfish

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 13:10

Rate this:

0 points

Mary in Brighton: Not to mention frequent reference to Jewish " sovereignty " and Jewish " rule".

what does that have to do with "supremacists"?

Mary in Brighton: Oh come on happygoldfish the site is brim full of unfavourable comparisons between Arabs and Jews, Advsr and Harvey prominent among the culprits.

no it isn't, you're just making that up

where do you claim that anyone here has said that?

Advis3r

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 13:14

Rate this:

0 points

Mary

Let's see on the Blog I posted entitled Real Real Zionism about Jewish/Arab co-operation what do we find:

Mary in Brighton

13 February, 2012 - 10:49 Yuk

I rest my case. By the way nobody is at all fooled by your phoney exasperation at being put to proof of a baseless allegation.


Mary in Brighton

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 13:38

Rate this:

0 points

Well silly me it was meant to be on the Migron post lol. If you didn't post so heavily and obsessively dizzy blondes wouldn't get confused


Real Real Zionist

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 13:57

Rate this:

0 points

My my, see how they squeal.

See how easily those that oppose the violent, imperialist, expansionist enterprise get convicted of anti semitism. More easily than a child that allegedly threw a stone gets convicted by a military court.

Then when it is thrown back at them see how they demand a standard of proof greater then would have been necessary to convict OJ Simpson.


Advis3r

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 15:16

Rate this:

0 points

More rants - this is so pathetic it would be cruel to even answer you.

But so that we are clear this blog is about, ah let me see, oh yes anti-Israel racists so what's that got to do with convicting youths for throwing rocks with intent to cause bodily harm? And OJ Simpson?

Talk about off topic.

POST A COMMENT

You must be logged in to post a comment.

LATEST COMMENTS