Advis3r away on a rant?
February 9, 2012
Goldie you answer RRZ but do not pull him up and let him get away with repeating lies/myths.
However this incitement to the murder of over 300,000 Jews living in Judea and Samaria apparently is perfectly acceptable to be posted on a Jewish website?
There is a contract between Israeli society/the Israeli government whereby the settlers will do the imperialist dirty work and in return, the government will protect them. However, why should the rest of us care about a private contract? If this were an internal UK issue, for example, the contract would not be enforceable. This is a contract to enter into illegal activity which no court would enforce. Such contracts are void... No they don't have any rights
I thought Phoney was simply a moron - I was mistaken. His is a mind so twisted that he argues for the murder of Jews on the basis that since as he falsely maintains they live illegally on someone else's land they forfeit the right to life. I suppose by extension that goes for the Travellers in Basildon too?
The settlers as he calls them are Israeli citizens and under the Law of Israel and the consensus they are legally entitled to live in Judea and Samaria on authorised areas - this was enshrined in the Oslo Accords until such time as a peace agreement is signed between the parties.
Israel legitimately lays claim to Judea and Samaria by virtue of the rights granted to the Jewish people by the League of Nations besides its historical and moral claims. The Jews have stolen nothing - there was no legal sovereign in Judea and Samaria before 1967 and Jews would still not be living in Judea and Samaria if Jordan had not attacked Israel in 1967, it did and it lost. Jordan has since given up all claims to Judea and Samaria.
It is now a matter between the competing claims of Israel and the Palestinians and until that has been decided and settled talk of Israel illegally occupying Judea and Samaria is plainly wrong since it is in a similar situation to the Allied Powers after WWII with the added difference that unlike them it has a legitimate claim to the land it controls.
RRZ by calling for the ethnic cleansing (read murder) of 300,000 Jews shows precisely in whose camp he belongs, not someone with whom I would want to engage. A Zionist he plainly is not.
MORE FROM THIS AUTHOR
- happygoldfish RE: MEMO 352
- happygoldfish RE: David Ward blog post written by John Hilley
- Rich Armbach RE: Church of Scotland pulls back
- Rich Armbach RE: Oxfam and the Board - what should happen if the red lines are crossed
- happygoldfish RE: SCoJeC and Board of Deputies respond to Church of Scotland revised report