Why Do The Deluded Self-Haters And Anti-Semites Persist In Posting On The Jewish Chronicle?


By Jon_i_Cohen
June 12, 2010
Share

The short answer is that they are unable to have their 2-digit IQ rantings published anywhere else, and this web-site has an open policy.
A more detailed explanation follows:-
The concept of the delusional disorder has both a very short history, formally, but a very long history when one integrates reports and observations over the last 150 years. The term of delusional disorder was only coined in 1977. This term has been used to describe an illness with persistent delusions,separate though from delusions that occur in other medical and psychiatric.
However, the concept of paranoia has been used for centuries. Originally, the word paranoia comes from Greek para, meaning along side, and noos or nous, meaning mind, intelligence. The Greeks used this term to describe any mental abnormalities similar to how we use the word insanity.

In the modern world, the term reappeared in the 17th century, and it was largely used as a generic name for mental illness. In 1863, Karl Kahlbaum introduced the concept of paranoia as a separate mental illness: "a form of partial insanity which, throughout the course of the disease, principally affected the sphere of the intellect".

This is the point folks!!:-
Delusional disorder is an illness characterized by the presence of nonbizarre delusions in the absence of other mood or psychotic symptoms, according to the Diagnostic Manual of Mental Disorders. It defines delusions as false beliefs based on incorrect inference about external reality that persist despite the evidence to the contrary and these beliefs are not ordinarily accepted by other members of the person's culture or subculture.

I will go on:-
Nonbizarre refers to the fact that this type of delusion is about situations that could occur in real life, such as being followed, being loved, having an infection, and being deceived by one's spouse.

Delusional disorder is on a spectrum between more severe psychosis and overvalued ideas. Bizarre delusions represent the manifestations of more severe types of psychotic illnesses (eg, schizophrenia) and "are clearly implausible, not understandable, and not derived from ordinary life experiences".

On the other end of the spectrum, making a distinction between a delusion and an overvalued idea is important, the latter representing an unreasonable belief that is not firmly held. Additionally, personal beliefs should be evaluated with great respect to complexity of cultural and religious differences: some cultures have widely accepted beliefs that may be considered delusional in other cultures.

Unfortunately, patients with delusional disorder do not have good insight into their pathological experiences. Interestingly, despite significant delusions, many other psychosocial abilities remain intact, as if the delusions are circumscribed. Indeed, this is one of the key differences between delusional disorder and other primary psychotic disorders. However, the individual may rarely seek psychiatric help, remain isolated, and often present to internists, surgeons, dermatologists, policemen, and lawyers rather than psychiatrists. Despite this, their prognosis, while not good, is not as bad as other more severe disorders.

Background and History
The seminal work with regard to what would become the frame for delusional disorder came from Emil Kraepelin. He observed 19 cases and worked on defining the concept of paranoia, which is reflected in several editions of his famous textbook and most closely resembles the modern definition of delusional disorder. Kraepelin viewed paranoia as an uncommon, chronic condition different from dementia praecox by the presence of fixed, nonbizarre delusions, lacking deterioration over time, preserved thought process, and relatively slight involvement of affect and volition. Kraepelin described that delusions of paranoia, contrary to the delusions of dementia praecox, are well systemised, relatively consistent, and often related to real-life events. He identified persecutory, grandiose, jealous, erotomanic, and possibly hypochondriacal types of that disorder. He believed that the illness derived from the deficit in the patients' judgments caused by constitutional factors and environmental stress. Later, Eugene Bleuler continued to recognize paranoia as a separate disorder and included hallucinations in its description.

After Kraepelin's death, Kurt Kolle (1931) reported a detailed follow-up of 66 cases seen in Kraepelin's former clinic in Munich.3 He noted a pattern of deterioration involving paranoia and concluded these were a form of schizophrenia. This view continued to be popular in the psychiatric community for several decades and was reflected in DSM-I and DSM-II. Winokur (1977) had reframed paranoia under the name of delusional disorder basing his findings on Kraepelin's definition and the observation of case types.3 Additionally, Kendler (1980) and Munro (1982) substantially contributed to our current understanding of nosology of this illness.3,5 In 1987, delusional disorder was introduced in DSM-III-R and continued to be present in subsequent editions.

So,if you have read this far you will have learnt that there is established and recognised medical conditions for the self-haters and anti-semites, some of you will sympathise with them, I for one, have no sympathy for them.

COMMENTS

tomeisner2

12 June, 2010 - 19:36

Rate this:

0 points

Do you only wish to read comments of people who agree with you?
Wouldn't that be just a little boring?
The reason I write here is that I think it is important that you Zios are reminded that a lot of other Jews have a totally different opinion about Israel. Oh by the way I regularly have letters published in other papers such as the Times and Independent, oddly not The Guardian, but of course they hate Jews don't they?


Yvetta

12 June, 2010 - 20:50

Rate this:

0 points

I suspect, Tom, that if you were not a distinguished musician they would more often than not condemn your letters to the "circular file".


Blacklisted Dictator

12 June, 2010 - 21:50

Rate this:

0 points

Jon,

Their blogging is evidence that The JC allows freedom of expression on the site.

John Gold, however, has described the JC's editors as "fascists", so I doubt that he would agree.


amber

12 June, 2010 - 21:55

Rate this:

1 point

Eisner, do you stand up for such plurality amongst the Palestinian society you so adore? There really isn't much, is there? true fascist societies you ignore, so instead you invent one.

And do you condemn Hamas, who advocate the extermination of the Jewish people? I'm going to keep asking you.


amber

12 June, 2010 - 21:56

Rate this:

0 points

Yvetta, I wouldn't call eisner a "distinguished" musician exactly.


Jon_i_Cohen

12 June, 2010 - 23:12

Rate this:

1 point

Very interesting that tomeisner2 is the first to post a comment here, and agrees with my premise that he is a deluded self-hater.


Blacklisted Dictator

13 June, 2010 - 07:22

Rate this:

0 points

Jon,
I think that the following should be included in The DSM:

The Otto Weininger syndrome
By SARAH HONIG
04/06/2010

The mental aberration that the auto-anti-Semitic 23-year-old philosopher, who shot himself in 1903, took to extremes is still being taken to extremes by his torchbearers.
Suicide can be individual or collective. In either manifestation it can share similar attributes and arise from parallel psychological anomalies. It can be perversely popular.
In early 20th-century Vienna, for example, a spate of high-profile suicides triggered a pseudo-romantic fad. There seemed to be something dashing in taking one’s own life in a grand gesture that apparently made a statement. Pivotal in sensationalizing the fashion was 23-year-old philosopher Otto Weininger who shot himself in 1903 in the same hotel room where Beethoven died (presumably to enhance the dramatic effect).
Weininger’s intense auto-anti-Semitism loomed large among his motivations. Born Jewish, he converted to Christianity in his last year but obviously found no salvation. His book Geschlecht und Charakter (Gender and Character) testifies to boundless self-loathing. Weininger lambastes modernity as “Jewish” and asserts that ”women and Jews are pimps; their goal is to make man guilty. Our era is not only the most Jewish, but also the most feminine of eras” which “no longer has a single great artist, a single great philosopher. It has the least originality and the biggest hunt for originality.”
Moreover, Weininger makes hair-raising “anthropological observations,”even embracing notions that “Jewish hair... points to the Negro, and the completely Chinese or Malaysian skull shapes, which one so often finds among the Jews – who frequently have a yellow complexion – point to partly Mongolian blood.” Harrowing stuff.
Unsurprisingly Weininger’s most ardent posthumous fans were the Nazis, foremost Hitler himself who reportedly said he “had only encountered one decent Jew, Otto Weininger, who killed himself when he realized that the Jew thrives on contaminating the authentic folk bloodlines of others.”
Weininger’s suicide was regarded by Third Reich ideologues as the only “honorable” way for a Jew to cleanse the world of his existence.
Repulsive as this undeniably is, it’s hardly irrelevant. The noxious Weininger syndrome still afflicts certain Jews. The mental aberration Weininger took to extremes is still being taken to extremes by his torchbearers. But there’s one very significant difference. Latter-day Weiningers look out quite nicely for their own well-being. Their self-abhorrence is channeled onto the Jewish collective. They promote national Jewish suicide, not their own personal demise.
A CASE in point is Noam Chomsky who, despite his pristine Hebrew forename, misses no opportunity to castigate the Jewish state and idolize its most fanatic and implacable foes (most recently Hizbullah chieftain Hassan Nasrallah).
Trailing behind Chomsky is a whole ragtag retinue of homegrown Israeli ultra-leftist professors, authors, filmmakers and self-congratulating artistes, who profit quite handsomely by undermining and demonizing the rest of us – pro forma their compatriots, but in reality the objects of their expediently projected self-detestation.
Some “new historians” and serial provocateurs have achieved renown. These international celebrities, who gain fame and fortune by trashing their own country and people, have avid audiences overseas, where delegitimization of Israel is eagerly lapped up and where tradition has conditioned minds to anti-Jewish bias (to put it mildly).
Toeing the line of self-hating Jews/Israelis who had reaped success from aversion to their own kind are wannabes who persistently pursue comparable glory. Dror Feiler is one. His latest antic was organizing the supposedly humanitarian flotilla to break the supposedly inhumane Israeli blockade of Gaza.
Feiler never mentioned the facts that Israel regularly (and quite dementedly) supplies Gaza with goods, electricity, fuel and water, whereas Gaza uses its resources to subjugate its masses and stockpile weapons of mass destruction.
Feiler either justifies or omits from discourse Gaza’s many and flagrant sins. He grotesquely exaggerates Israeli responses and willfully wrests them out of all context. Feiler delights in painting Israel as intrinsically and irredeemably evil. He’s chummy with reporter Donald Bostrom who accused Israel of illicit organ-harvesting. Don’t look for Jewish empathy or a soft spot for the old homeland in Dror. That would contradict his upbringing. That’s not where he comes from.
He’s a loyal unquestioning chip off the old block – his mother, Pnina Feiler, who spent a lifetime championing Palestinian causes and defaming Israel with relish. She hails from Yad Hanna, Israel’s sole communist kibbutz. It was named in 1950 after heroic World War II parachutist Hanna Szenes, whose memory and legacy have of late been targeted by artsy left-wing iconoclasts. Self-sacrifice for a Jewish cause and Zionist dedication had become unbearable in their enlightened milieu.
Among other groups, Pnina Feiler was active in the pro-Arab Physicians for Human Rights-Israel (in her professional capacity as a nurse). In May 2001, after Arabs sadistically bashed the skulls of two hooky-playing schoolboys near Tekoa, PHR-Israel’s founder, psychiatrist Ruchama Marton, reacted angrily toward the underage victims. “The settlers,” she seethed, “raise little monsters.”
That’s the moral wellspring from which Dror drank. That’s the intellectual and ideological pool in which he waded and where he learned that pools of Jewish blood form an aesthetic background against which to highlight the glorified features of Hanadi Jaradat, who blew herself up next to a baby in her buggy at Haifa’s Maxim Restaurant in 2003 (murdering 21, among them three generations of two separate families).
A few months post-atrocity, Dror, a naturalized Swedish citizen, and his Scandinavian wife created the Stockholm-exhibited “work of art” that presented Jaradat as “Snow White” sailing in a red-liquid lake. The image goaded Israel’s enraged then-ambassador Zvi Mazel to sabotage it.
Dror exuded the same artistic orientation which had earlier inspired a gloating art show in Nablus featuring bloodied pizza slices and a baby stroller inside a model of Jerusalem’s Sbarro eatery after the 2001 terrorist blast (which killed 15 innocents, including nine children and five members of a single family). Nevertheless, Dror enjoyed unstinting succor and friendly publicity. His sanctified suicide bomber starred boldly in giant advertising posters all around greater Stockholm.
The text which accompanied Dror’s masterpiece argued that Jaradat’s homicidal ardor was kindled by grief over a brother and cousin the Israelis slew. Swedes, like other supercilious Europeans, love Jews who – like Dror – love their enemies. Jews are required to show compassion toward those who, with genocidal malice aforethought, still keep trying to annihilate them. Jews are sentenced to solitary confinement on the moral high ground, where no other nation is remotely expected to go. Jews are obliged to turn the other cheek. Jews have no right to avenge.
So when Dror Feiler now postures as a humanitarian, we need to remember that he also rationalizes the zeal for blowing us up to smithereens. That makes him even less ethically tolerable than Weininger, who merely fired a bullet into his own private chest.
Both Weininger and Feiler boosted pernicious Judeophobic propaganda. Both gave comfort and ostensible vindication to their people’s enemies, yet Weininger only took his self-hate to its logical conclusions personally. Thus, warped as he doubtlessly was, he emerges more moral than Dror Feiler, in so far as the word moral is at all applicable here.
www.sarahhonig.com


Yvetta

13 June, 2010 - 08:02

Rate this:

0 points

For our "distinguished musician":
gaza o gaza !.mov
www.youtube.com


Yvetta

13 June, 2010 - 08:03

Rate this:

0 points

Great post, btw, BD.


Blacklisted Dictator

13 June, 2010 - 08:08

Rate this:

0 points

tomeisner2,

What do you think about "The Otto Weininger syndrome"?


tomeisner2

13 June, 2010 - 09:25

Rate this:

0 points

Amber, You persist in asking me the same question,
"And do you condemn Hamas, who advocate the extermination of the Jewish people?"

I refuse to give you a nice easy YES NO answer to this one but I will say that I am convinced that if you had been born in Gaza as a Palestinian and had had to endure the racist treatment handed out to you by Israel just because you weren't Jewish I don't think you would have had to nice a thing to say about your oppressors.

The occasion I met 2 members of Hamas they certainly did not agree with the above statement because I asked them! Their hatred was of Israel not the Jews- this is something they were absolutely clear about. I am sure there are doubtless members of Hamas who loath the Jews just as there are 70% of the Israeli public who want to throw every Palestinian/ Israeli citizen out of Israel.

Don't forget Israel already has carried out its ethnic cleansing programme, albeit not quite completed it. That famous ghastly racist Golda Meir saying "There are no such people as the Palestinians" To my ears sounds just as bad as the worst rhetoric of Hamas.


Blacklisted Dictator

13 June, 2010 - 09:37

Rate this:

0 points

Tomeisener2, John Gold and Stevabbott,

What do you think of the attached which has today been posted on The JC? Should it be deleted?

Jews and Cycling

By NWJew
June 13, 2010
Did you know that every (dry and warm) Sunday, several groups of middle-aged Jewish men take their bicycles out into the countryside north of London on what they call training rides? They are training for one of the many charity bike rides that take place throughout the summer months.
These cyclists are easy to spot. They ride fancy bikes, wear lurid Lycra and they puff and pant. We may turn up our noses at balding beer-bellied football fans in their club shirts but surely they’re no worse than balding cake-bellied cyclists hoping to pass themselves off as Lance Armstrong? Of course, having the kit doesn’t make them Lance Armstrong. For one thing, Lance likes to ride his bike whereas a Jew likes to admire his bike through the window of a coffee shop while telling his friends how much it cost.
The other topic of cappuccino conversation is how much they have raised so far for their chosen charity. Don’t get me wrong, I’m all for a good cause, and as a keen(ish) environmentalist can think of few better ways than a cycle challenge to achieve it. I just think it’s a pity that they have to fly out to the other side of the world in order to participate. Instead of stumping up hundreds of pounds just to get to the start line, they could give even more to the charity and keep their carbon footprint confined to their fancy schmancy carbon-fibre bikes.
Truth be told, you’ll be lucky if you ever see a Jew actually riding his bike. If he’s not resting in Starbuck’s after a solid three miles in the saddle he’s trying to fix a puncture without suitable tools. And when I say he’s trying to fix a puncture what I really mean is he’s amongst half a dozen men crowded around his dismantled wheel, rather like the doctors who examined the Roswell aliens; at the same time curious and fearful.
After several minutes one will suggest using tyre levers to extract the inner tube. “Good idea” says his pal. “What are tyre levers?” asks a third as he pathetically pokes around with an old butter knife (the Jew’s universal tool) that lives in the neat little under-the-saddle tool bag – the one that contains, apart from the butter knife, his keys, a wad of cash to pay for coffee and cake, several credit cards in case he needs more coffee and cake, and a couple of energy bars.
Eventually the self-appointed mechanic snaps the butter knife and withdraws in embarrassment leaving the rest to clear up the mess. Before long they are back on the road and heading for the nearest café.
Of course I’m generalising. Some Jewish cyclists take the sport incredibly seriously. My friend Moishe is one such and his speciality is hill climbing. When he’s managed to negotiate a few speed bumps he heads directly for the coffee shop claiming to be “King of the Mountains”. Mountains of cake, more like.
The other place you’ll see a Jewish cyclist is in the bike shop. In every group of Jewish cyclists at least one will be preening proudly aperch his brand new super-lightweight machine.
Why, when he only bought a new bike last year, has he gone and spent the equivalent of Greece’s national debt on another? “Because this one is faster on account of it being three grammes lighter than that old piece of junk”, he’ll inform you as he squeezes through the doors of Starbuck’s on his way to yet another latte and cheesecake.


steveabbott

13 June, 2010 - 09:49

Rate this:

0 points

yes i just read it.

aside from a flag as offensive (i have), it should be completely ignored. nobody should be bothered to respond - expecially on the thread itself.

it doesnt require any comment. the best response is silence. if the jc want to take it off, or delete his blog thats up to them.


tomeisner2

13 June, 2010 - 10:21

Rate this:

0 points

see my comment


tomeisner2

13 June, 2010 - 10:22

Rate this:

0 points

It has gone! and now to discuss the planned JC Xmas party for the bloggers....


Yvetta

13 June, 2010 - 10:23

Rate this:

0 points

Excellent, Steve. I think silence is the best response to "John Gold".
And to be fair to Tom, he complained abopiut the antisemitic post on cyclists.
Bit of a posthumous victory for the antisemite there, BD, for although his blog is gone its echo remains courtesy of your well-meaning zeal!
btw, do you all realise that youtube pulled "We Con the World"?


Yvetta

13 June, 2010 - 10:24

Rate this:

0 points

Xmas party - Chanukah surely?
But if you insist, don't expect any smackers from me or Amber under the mistletoe!


Blacklisted Dictator

13 June, 2010 - 10:42

Rate this:

0 points

Yvetta,
I vote that the copy of "Jews and Cyclists" remains here for posterity. It is highly relevant to Jon Cohen's post.


Yvetta

13 June, 2010 - 10:49

Rate this:

0 points

I see your point, BD.

Allow me to park this here:

Our goal is to coordinate online efforts to promote the Israeli narrative when Israel is unfairly attacked.
Check out our website at http://www.israelonlineambassadors.com/


Blacklisted Dictator

13 June, 2010 - 10:57

Rate this:

0 points

Yvetta,
Joshua18 believes that I am doing great harm to Israel and Jews worldwide. So, I don't think that I have the cv to be an ambassador. A pity, but I must expect my short-falls.

Of course, I nominate Joshua18 for the role. I am in awe of his blogging.


Blacklisted Dictator

13 June, 2010 - 10:58

Rate this:

0 points

Typo

"accept my short-falls"!


tomeisner2

13 June, 2010 - 11:00

Rate this:

0 points

Yvette and Amber, I was so looking forward to that moment!


amber

13 June, 2010 - 11:22

Rate this:

0 points

eisner, your post is n absolute disgrace.

That you refuse to condemn the antisemitic neo Nazi terror organization of Hamas says all we need to know about you. You then regurgitate a series of lies and excuses for them and their racism.

It is akin to saying "if you had been born a German in the 20's , seen your parents starve as a result of reparations payments, you would have been a Nazi too, and glefully taken part in the extermination of the Jews, who let's face it, ran the banks which led to your parents starving." Lies and garbage.

If Israel is carrying out "ethnic cleansing", can you explain why the Arab population inside Israel, Gaza, Judea and Samaria has consistently grown apace since the founding of the Jewish state? And can you explain why Iraq, which once had a large Jewish community (a quarter of Baghdad was Jewish not so long ago - A QUARTER! now has not one living Jew in the entire country? It is the Arabs who have been most adept at ethnic cleansing, not the Jews. It is a slander against the Jewish people, and you should be entirely ashamed. Being the gullible fool that you are, do you think it possible, just possible, that those representatives of the neo Nazis of Hamas may have been fibbing to you? Did you ask them why their charter calls for the extermination of every Jew on earth, and why their charter rejects any peace talks?

Evil.


amber

13 June, 2010 - 11:26

Rate this:

0 points

While we're at it, did you ask why Hamas give Nazi salutes?

You are the very definition of a useful idiot.


Yvetta

13 June, 2010 - 12:06

Rate this:

0 points

Recommended reading for you here, Tom.
But take off your rose-tinted spectacles first.

Helen Thomas, Turkey, and the Liberation of Israel - Victor Davis Hanson - National Review Online
article.nationalreview.com


steveabbott

13 June, 2010 - 19:55

Rate this:

0 points

those bloggers who advocate silence from myself, tomeisner, and john gold remind me of the labour party 1982. So concerned with navel gazing, the maintenance of ideological purity, and the elimination of dissent from their utopia to be, that they failed to notice the outside world was coalescing around an alternative agenda - one that would keep them out of power for another 17 years. in this case, again the desire not to engage tends to irrelevancy.

yasser arafat only said two things worth remembering. 1: 'you make peace with your enemies not your friends'. 2: 'we are not asking for the moon'.


amber

13 June, 2010 - 21:33

Rate this:

1 point

abbot

Quoting the murderer and pioneer of modern terrorism Arafat is meant to impress me?

You are so far gone..I mean, REALLY far gone.


steveabbott

13 June, 2010 - 22:00

Rate this:

0 points

amber. but can you fault the quotes?


steveabbott

13 June, 2010 - 22:17

Rate this:

0 points

amber. the stern gang wre doing terrorism when arafat was in short trousers.


Blacklisted Dictator

14 June, 2010 - 06:25

Rate this:

0 points

Steve abbott,

you write:
yasser arafat only said two things worth remembering. 1: 'you make peace with your enemies not your friends'. 2: 'we are not asking for the moon'

Is this the sort of stuff that you included in your politics essays at university? It really is of a very high standard.

I congratulate you for your critical facilities.


Blacklisted Dictator

14 June, 2010 - 06:35

Rate this:

0 points

I just wish that the critique of Israel, provided by Messrs Meisner Abbott and Gold
was of a higher standard.


Yvetta

14 June, 2010 - 07:14

Rate this:

0 points

Ah! The Stern Gang. Sooner or later, when the Israel-haters feel they are losing the argument, they pop in a reference to the Stern Gang. That's usually after the one about the King David Hotel.


steveabbott

14 June, 2010 - 09:18

Rate this:

0 points

yvetta. i only referred to the stern gang, after amber said arafat was the father of terrorism. otherwise i would not have mentioned it. i generally try not to mention israeli pre-state, or state terrorism (not always succesfully), unless i am responding to another blogger banging on about everyone else's terrorism. its about balance really.


Yvetta

14 June, 2010 - 09:44

Rate this:

0 points

Righto, Steve.


tomeisner2

14 June, 2010 - 09:55

Rate this:

0 points

Thanks Steve for reminding the Zios about the founders of Israel.
In a famous letter to The New York Times in 1948, Albert Einstein called the Irgun "a terrorist, rightwing, chauvinist organization" that stood for "ultranationalism, religious mysticism and racial superiority."

Of course Einstein was really stupid, low iq, and of course a self hater..


jose (not verified)

14 June, 2010 - 10:02

Rate this:

1 point

Well, I like to read another opinion, when it is not as ludicrously extreme as that of Tom Eisner. There is no enlightenment to expect by reading the sick words of a sick man.
Fortunately, the "lot of other Jews" that are as deluded as you are is really a handful.

I have an interesting story: Shlomo Sand, the infamous author of a "The Invention of the Jewish People" was proven wrong by two scientific genetic studies, one of which was even published in the prestigious journal Nature.
That did not prevent the book to be a library success, probably thanks to Tom Eisner and his ilk. A panel of French journalists even gave him a literary price for a 'history' book.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/10/science/10jews.html

So there is a Jewish People, after all. Only that in my definition, Tom Eisner is not part of it.


Yvetta

14 June, 2010 - 10:47

Rate this:

0 points

Tom Eisner, Einstein was talking about the Irgun, not Israel.


amber

14 June, 2010 - 10:57

Rate this:

0 points

abbot, that's really pathetic. The Stern Gang were last active...62 years ago. It is of course a longstanding antisemitic lie that the Jews invented terrorism. Arafat pioneered the use of civilian aircraft for terrorism, a tactic that led directly to 9/11. HE WAS ALSO RESPONSIBLE FOR TARGETING KINDERGARTENS and Israeli athletes. That you quote him so admiringly is a sad reflection on you.

You are indeed an Israel hater. By the way, did you know he was born in Cairo?


amber

14 June, 2010 - 10:58

Rate this:

0 points

eisner, a bit selective, aren't you? Einstein was also a Zionist, and suporter of Israel.

Half a brain sees half the facts.


steveabbott

14 June, 2010 - 12:22

Rate this:

0 points

amber. yes - yes - i believe i had heard he was born in cairo. the stern gang may have been active a long time ago, along with the irgun, but when was the last time one of israel's blackhawks fired a hellfire missile at a car carring 'terrorists' in the middle of a busy intersection in Gaza city? or the last time an Israeli F16 dropped a 1000lb bomb onto a civilian apartment building in Gaza, in order to kill ONE hamas leader?

How many children (in kindergartens and elsewhere no doubt) did the IDF kill in Lebanon 2006, and Gaza 2008/9 amber? now you say - 'about 1000 steve, but its not terrorism, they were military operations'. quite so amber.

your posts are getting shriller by the hour amber. lets face it, your on a hiding to nothing here. leave it to the big boys like joshua18, and BD.

and you, my dear, are a hater of humanity.


amber

14 June, 2010 - 12:37

Rate this:

1 point

abbot, your post is the result of lazy thinking and moral relativism. War means casualties. The IDF goes to strenuous efforts to avoid civilian casualties, and frequently aborts missions due to the risk. Hamas and Ftaah set out to kill civilians, and actually rejoice when the do so. That you can't see the difference says a lot about your intellectual and moral capacity.

Do you have any idea how many civilians we killed in liberating Normandy from the Nazis? Tell me - take a guess.


DLeigh-Ellis

14 June, 2010 - 17:00

Rate this:

0 points

Lol Jon 'delusional disorder' I Cohen. That might be my new pet name for you....

Do you now need to resort to medical terms in order to justify to yourself why someone might not agree with your blinkered worldview?

Why not accept that opinions are there to be engaged with on a level of discourse, rather than pathetic attempts at undermining the reasoning of the individual.

Im sure many here could easily knock together a slapped-out psychological profile of yourself, and I can grant that it too would be remarkably unflattering.


Yvetta

14 June, 2010 - 17:14

Rate this:

0 points

Amber "a hater of humanity"?
No, the haters of humanity are the islamofascist terrorists.

Some interesting links:

RonMossad: The Kinks - Living on a Thin Line: Israel and the world in 2010
ronmossad.blogspot.com

Point of no return: Kurdish magazine appeals for Jewish support
jewishrefugees.blogspot.com


Yvetta

14 June, 2010 - 17:18

Rate this:

1 point

Steve, Tom has given enough evidence on these blogs that he wants both Israel and the Jewish People to disappear: if that is not antisemitism, I don't know what is.

POST A COMMENT

You must be logged in to post a comment.