White Phosphorous


By richmillett
February 3, 2010
Share

I was thinking how many ways there might be to try to delegitimise Israel. Loads i thought. In fact there are as many ways to delegitimise Israel as there are to get out in cricket:

1) Israel is in breach of UN Resolutions (LBW)
2) Israel is in breach of international law (caught)
3) Israel doesn’t want peace (run out)
4) Israel ethnically cleansed the Palestinians (bowled!)
5) Israel isn’t a democracy (timed out)
6) Israel is an apartheid state (interfering with play)
7) The Jews have no right to a state being just a religious group (hit wicket)
8) The Jews were never expelled by the Romans, so they can’t return to the Middle East (stumped)
9) The once oppressed Jews are now the oppressors (handled ball)
10) Israel acts like the Nazis did (hit ball twice)
11) Israel is guilty of war crimes (obstructing the fielder).

It is number 11 I find intriguing. When all else fails there is always the old accusation of war crimes. When a country has to go to war, then the most easily made accusation is that a country has not just killed, but has actually intentionally targeted innocent women and children.

Breaching UN resolutions is bad, ethnic cleansing is terrible, apartheid is vile but killing innocent woman and children on purpose is just despicable. And Israel stands accused of them all. Has another country ever been accused of such evil?

The latest accusation was that Israel used white phosphorous illegally during Operation Cast Lead. It is illegal to use white phosporous in a built up place like Gaza for obvious reasons. It is highly dangerous and will burn a victim’s skin right through. Not even water will stop it burning. It should not have been used and two senior Israeli army officers were reprimanded. But it seems the orders to use white phosphorous did not come down from high. The officers took the decision themselves.

Israel has always come clean when it was in the wrong. For example, Ariel Sharon was sacked on the recommendation of the Kahane Commission after the Sabra and Shatila massacres in Lebanon in 1982.

White phosphorous is legal in all other circumstances of war. America has been allegedly using it in Afghanstan. The smoke from the phosphorous acts as a smokescreen shielding soldiers and that is why America has used it and why Israel used it in Gaza. Israeli soldiers were able to carry out successful operations against Hamas because of it.

But it seems that from now on all of Israel’s wars will be carried out against terrorists in built up areas. That is how Hamas has chosen to fight. The days of the 1967 and 1973 wars being fought in the skies or in the vast open desert are over. So what is Israel to do? If it uses white phosphorous it will be accused of committing a war crime, if it doesn’t then Israeli soldiers will be gunned down more easily.

It is a terrible Catch 22 but there has never been an intent to target innocent civilians, unlike Hamas suicide bombers. There is a big difference.

A country will undoubtedly make mistakes in war and Israel has made many in the heat of a battle (Israel even lost four of its own soldiers to friendly fire during Cast Lead). It has also had to go to war on many occasions to defend its citizens. Evetually on the balance of probabilities the international community will catch some Israeli soldiers out, as it has finally done (albeit on Israel’s admission).

Every war is by definition a war crime as civilians will always tragically be killed but Israel is the only country persistently accused of war crimes and consistently hounded for them. Sanctions against Israel are constantly called for, the latest being by Liberal Democrat Lord Phillips, and its politicians and soldiers are put under threat of arrest by an international warrant like no other country’s politicians.

Some countries are accused of starting illegal wars (America and Britain), others are accused of that, war crimes and more (Israel).

There is only one time when Israel will not be so accused , and that is if it ever loses a war. Then, for once, the international community might not be so vocal.

COMMENTS

Blacklisted Dictator

Wed, 02/03/2010 - 06:52

Rate this:

0 points

And what will the third umpire, high in the sky, say if Israel loses a war..

"My People cheated in previous wars. So now, they have only themselves to blame. Of course the Nazisraelis must pay the ultimate sacrifice. And who will miss them etc?"

You see, when it comes to the Jews, nobody packs a loser. Or a winner for that matter.

Kindov ironik?


Blacklisted Dictator

Wed, 02/03/2010 - 06:54

Rate this:

0 points

Typo
"nobody backs a loser"


Yvetta

Wed, 02/03/2010 - 08:04

Rate this:

0 points

Great blog, Rich.
If Israel ever loses a war we'll need ear-muffs against the cacophony of cackling.
Better to live on its feet than die on its knees.


Jon_i_Cohen

Wed, 02/03/2010 - 08:30

Rate this:

0 points

Great blog - pity Israel is no good at cricket - Israel has to "play" to win every time- a draw is no good and in "cricket" there are too many draws.
Your point 11. this only applies to Israel. Of course it is no problem if Britain or America use Phosphorous, (or depelete Uranium shells), in Afghanistan, who cares? It's only the Taliban.
The politcally (in)correct left - wingers and self-haters only start wailing if it is Israel and the "Palestinians".
The phosphorous clouds are again just a cover for antisemitism. I would rather see a bit of phosphorous in the sky if it saved Israeli soldiers lives.
As for Israel losing a war, imho that is not a likely scenario as Israel holds the "ultimate card".


gold.sarah

Wed, 02/03/2010 - 15:12

Rate this:

0 points

Of course the events in Gaza were not a war.
A war is a meeting of armies with comparable resources. One army may eventually wearr out the other or out - produce it.

The fighters in Gaza were armed, at the very best, with AK47s. Isreal was armed with the best that US taxpayers money can buy.

The events in Gaza were a massacre.

The massacre in Gaza was a fillip for the defeat suffered previously to Hizbollah. Israel's army only ever fights weak, defenceless populations. Against a more organised Hizbollah, themselves lacking the US taxpayers weaponary, the Israeli army took a beating. So they decided to massacre hundreds of children and women so they could feel like men again.

POST A COMMENT

You must be logged in to post a comment.

RICHMILLETT ON TWITTER

    LATEST COMMENTS