waterdrops was terminated


By jandrsimonson
January 26, 2011
Share

"Waterdrop was terminated "

Does the JC really not know how ridiculous it looks when it tries to cleanse it's blog site in order to maintain it as a safe environment for a handful of hysterical foul mouthed ranters ?

"Expect him to return with another pseudo."

And so types the king of coming back with another pseudo

COMMENTS

jandrsimonson

26 January, 2011 - 20:14

Rate this:

-4 points

I suppose they won't be happy until they can rant away without any fear of interuption


jose (not verified)

26 January, 2011 - 20:16

Rate this:

4 points

By the way, Wheelchair is also terminated.

Make another blog post of it. I love it when you get so ridiculous, simonsam!


jose (not verified)

26 January, 2011 - 20:18

Rate this:

4 points

By the way, accusing people of having another pseudo, while being totally unable to prove such accusation is libel, besides of being paranoia since it is evidently false.


jandrsimonson

26 January, 2011 - 20:23

Rate this:

-4 points

JoseAnth sue me


jose (not verified)

26 January, 2011 - 20:25

Rate this:

6 points

JoseAnth sue me

Where is JoseAnth, simonsam? Show us your paranoia, please!


jose (not verified)

26 January, 2011 - 20:28

Rate this:

3 points

Here we see an example of simonsam's morality. He feels he has the right to libel someone, because he believes he will not be sued, not because he is right.
This is typical from antisemites, when they are supported by the government and the pseudo-justice at its service.

Will the JC tolerate people who libel others? I ask all the honest bloggers here to ask for simonsam's termination when he behaves in such an unacceptable way.


jose (not verified)

26 January, 2011 - 20:37

Rate this:

3 points

And by the way, your buddy the antisemite newsmax has also been terminated. But I guess you knew it already.


Yoni1

26 January, 2011 - 20:41

Rate this:

4 points

Does Simonson not realise how (even more) ridiculous he is when he rants against others who are supposedly ranting, when his Jew-hating ranting is splashed across so many JC blogs?


jandrsimonson

26 January, 2011 - 20:58

Rate this:

-4 points

Hating my Jewish wife and Jewish daughters is a full time commitment I don't need to come here to hate Jews


jose (not verified)

26 January, 2011 - 21:07

Rate this:

3 points

Hating my Jewish wife and Jewish daughters is a full time commitment I don't need to come here to hate Jews

Don't be even more ridiculous, simonsam. We all have seen in our lives antisemitic Jews. Think of Finkelstein, for example.
You come here because you hate Israel (that is, Israeli Jews).
You are unable to utter a simple condemnation of HAMAS and Hezbollah without blaming it on Israel at the same time.
You are a Nazi-supporter of these Nazi organisations.


jandrsimonson

26 January, 2011 - 21:15

Rate this:

-3 points

Well JoseAnth there doesn't seem to be anyone left after the purges to interupt you and I sure as hell can't be bothered


jose (not verified)

26 January, 2011 - 21:29

Rate this:

1 point

Well JoseAnth

Where is JoseAnth, Wheelchair? Show us your paranoia again?

there doesn't seem to be anyone left after the purges to interupt you

How does one interupt another, on a blog? Don't you feel ridiculous when you state this kind of stupidities?
Do you think that people can libel and write antisemitic statements freely on a Jewish journal's blog? Make blood libels like Walinuts?
You don't like contradiction when people contradict you but you are very pleased to attack the persons of the people who do not think like you that Israel is the source of all the troubles in the world, bar none.

and I sure as hell can't be bothered

Then why do you make a blog post of it, stupid?


Yoni1

26 January, 2011 - 22:33

Rate this:

2 points

Probably because he IS stupid.


amber

26 January, 2011 - 23:28

Rate this:

2 points

simonson, do you knw how ridiculous it looks when the JC tolerates blatant racists like Waterman? We were not dealing with someoen critical of a specific policy here or there - he was an individual who blamed anti-Semitism on the behaviour of Jews, drew constant analogies between Zionists and Nazis, and was hellebnt on delegitimizing the Jewish state altogether.

That you find it difficult to tell the difference between that, and legitimate discussion and debate, says a lot about where you are coming from.


amber

26 January, 2011 - 23:29

Rate this:

3 points

The JC made the right decision. If the JC did not take such decisions, these blogs would be a magnet to every rabid Jew hater out there.

POST A COMMENT

You must be logged in to post a comment.