United Nations supports burkas, beatings and stonings


By Anthony Posner
October 31, 2010
Share

http://www.jihadwatch.org/2010/10/iran-once-again-up-for-a-seat-in-un-wo...

Iran once again up for a seat in UN women's rights organization
It's absurd enough that this would happen once, but it's not the first time. And Saudi Arabia is up for a supporting role.

When apologists for Islam defend Sharia's deplorable record on women's rights and human rights in general, they often cite marginal improvements that Islamic law may have introduced in the seventh century and soon thereafter, despite the misogyny that pervades Muhammad's comments on women: according to authoritative ("Sahih," or "sound") Islamic sources, he said they are "deficient in religion and intellect" (Sahih Bukhari 1.6.301), and destined to be the majority among souls consigned to hell (Sahih Bukhari 4.54.464). Not to mention the Qur'anic endorsement of beating (yes, beating) women "from whom you fear disobedience" (4:34).

No, whatever slight relief Islam may claim to have introduced almost one and a half millennia ago is but a testament to the fact that the rest of the world has long since passed Sharia by, where it was not already ahead before Sharia's introduction.

But Iran and Saudi Arabia still want a pat on the back for providing what comparatively little they believe divine fiat provided in terms of women's rights, and nothing more, lest they be accused of bida, or innovation, and wind up in hell where Muhammad said all those morally and intellectually deficient women would be.

"Iran close to a seat on UN agency that promotes equality for women," from Asia News, October 29:

Tehran (AsiaNews/Agencies) - The United States Government and human rights groups reacted forcefully yesterday to news that Iran is close to gaining a seat on a new UN agency to promote equality for women.
The body, UN Women, is intended to promote women's rights, but the nomination of Iran has caused outrage, particularly in light of the case of Sakineh Mohammadi Ashtiani, the 43-year-old mother of two sentenced to death by stoning for alleged adultery.
"UN Women is tasked with promoting gender equality and women's empowerment worldwide. We and many other countries are concerned by the negative implications of Iran's potential board memberships, given its poor record on human rights and the treatment of women," said Mark Kornblau, spokesman for the US mission to the United Nations.
Under a General Assembly resolution, four UN agencies are being merged into one 41-member body. Regional groups nominate 35 countries with a further six donor nations to be included.
The Asian group has proposed an uncontested ten-nation list that includes Iran.
Saudi Arabia's nomination as one of the donor countries has also caused concern. Women are not allowed to drive in the kingdom and segregation of the sexes is strictly enforced by the country's religious police.
In both countries, women are routinely harassed and can face severe punishment, including jail and lashings, for behaviour or dress deemed immodest.
UN Women will be headed by the former Chilean President, Michelle Bachelet, an appointment that has been applauded by all.

COMMENTS

Anthony Posner

31 October, 2010 - 19:43

Rate this:

0 points

How boring!

Why does he have to blog this? Burka, burka, burka! Even Pollard's Daily Express Tory stuff is more varied.

But of course, there is always Avraham Reiss' blog, so all is not lost.


Yvetta

31 October, 2010 - 21:07

Rate this:

0 points

Er - there used to be a forum (now closed) where there was a chap called Jezza who posted an endless number of threads on "Apple Pie Beds". He'd ask for readers' nostalgic memories of having this "jolly prank" played upon them or playing it on someone else. Nobody - but nobody - had any such memories, and most people had never heard of an "apple pie bed". So all he got was derision. But, unpeturbed, Jezza kept on posting those threads until the site shuffled off this mortal coil.


Anthony Posner

31 October, 2010 - 21:10

Rate this:

0 points

Yvetta,

And the relevance to The UN and the appalling abuse of women's rights?

Are you suggesting that the above blog should incite derision?


mattpryor

1 November, 2010 - 19:05

Rate this:

0 points

The daft thing about this is that the US's position is "yeah, we know these UN groups are awful, but we're working on reforming them." Like they're working on paying off the budget deficit. They don't care because it won't win them votes. And they don't care that barbarous, murderous regimes are destroying the United Nations from within, on Obama's watch.

People that are disturbed by this should support UN Watch, an excellent lobby group exposing the hypocrisy of the UNHRC etc.


Anthony Posner

1 November, 2010 - 19:16

Rate this:

0 points

Matt,

I agree.

(The UN Watch website is excellent.)

POST A COMMENT

You must be logged in to post a comment.