The Ottawa Protocol


By Anonymous
November 16, 2010
Share

http://www.antisemitism.org.il/eng/%20Ottawa%20Protocol

The definition of antisemitism was vastly extended to cover the modern way of expressing it.
"* Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavour.
* Applying double standards by requiring of it behaviour not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation.
* Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism (e.g. claims of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize Israel or Israelis.
* Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.
* Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the State of Israel."

Anti-zionism is clearly exposed as antisemitism, zionism being the only expression of Jewish people's right to self determination.
Comparisons of Jews with Nazis, Gaza as a "concentration camp" (v2.0, no doubt) are also included.
'Explaining' the rise in antisemitism (even stopping short of justifying it) by the actions of the State of Israel, all that is now, and justly, called antisemitism.

COMMENTS

Avraham Reiss

16 November, 2010 - 21:20

Rate this:

0 points

Another Anthony irrelevancy, nothing new, regurgitating same old facts.


mattpryor

16 November, 2010 - 21:48

Rate this:

0 points

Fair enough, thanks for posting Jose.


jose (not verified)

17 November, 2010 - 03:44

Rate this:

0 points

telegramsam, I already told you that your opinion on what is interesting to others are not worthy mentioning. You can see others appreciate.


Kahina

17 November, 2010 - 10:11

Rate this:

1 point

Avraham

You may get banned for suggesting this Jose bloke is Anthony.

Anthony Posner got banned for persisting in writing TelegramSam is Moshe Tzarfat (according to the letter printed on your website).

Me thinks a few people in Furnival Street are getting their knickers in a twist with bloggers mixing their names up.


Yvetta

17 November, 2010 - 11:54

Rate this:

0 points

Good to be reminded of this via the link.


jose (not verified)

17 November, 2010 - 13:59

Rate this:

0 points

Banning Avraham would be a gain for the community of JC bloggers.


mattpryor

17 November, 2010 - 14:14

Rate this:

0 points

Jose, Avraham: Please give it a rest now guys.

POST A COMMENT

You must be logged in to post a comment.