The Danger of the Self Hating Jew


By Jon_i_Cohen
November 21, 2009
Share

So, it's the 19th century "historians" that are responsible for "inventing" the Jewish people, before that there was NO "Jewish" people. Why do the broadcasters and publishers give air time and funds for such drivel? I refer to Shlomo Sands.
Same old problem, we can deal with all our enemies, but for the biggest enemy of all, the self-hating Jewish "intellectual historian", in every generation they crawl out from under a stone. They try to deny history and archaeologicial discoveries and re-interpret the world to fit in with their own fantasies. Sackur did a good job but both Sands and Shlaim need to be debated against by experts so they can be shown up for what they are, intellectual lightweights who are distorting history for their own twisted personal reasons.
How does this idiot, Shlaim, become a "Professor" at Oxford, and as for Sands, a "Professor" in Tel Aviv, what is going on?
Would someone like to provide the funds and I will write a book to prove, line by line, what these two idiots have published and are spewing out in public is utter nonsense.

COMMENTS


Yvetta

23 November, 2009 - 12:49

Rate this:

0 points

I always wonder what the rabid academic Israel-bashers teach their students in courses such as international politics and modern history that have particular relevance to the situation.
The infiltration of academic Jewish Studies departments by Israel-haters is a new and ominous development. Everyone is entitled, of course, to their own view of the Middle East situation, including the occupation of the West Bank and Gaza. But I think we're entitled to shudder when advocates of an extreme anti-Israel position teach Jewish Studies at universities. For instance, at Leicester University courses on modern Jewish history, Israel,and Zionism are taught by Dr Claudia Prestel, a senior academic who has endorsed the "One State Declaration" prepared by Ilan Pappe and other extremists. Voicing opposition to aspects of Israeli policy, as she and certain other academics have done for years, is one thing. Advocating the abolition of Israel is quite another.
Perhaps it is in academia that Israel's battle for hearts and minds will be won or lost.


iainlrabbak

23 November, 2009 - 13:32

Rate this:

0 points

And I always wonder about the self-defeating Jew -- that is those who in the face of all the evidence still insist on backing Israel's self-destructive policies.


Kevin Brook

24 November, 2009 - 03:18

Rate this:

0 points

In the letter "Shlomo Sand responds to Simon Schama's review in the Financial Times", dated November 21, Sand claims "no serious work concerning the origins of the demographic weight of Yiddish-speaking Jews has been carried out" in recent decades. That isn't true. I wrote a study of this very nature titled "The Origins of East European Jews" and it was published in the scholarly journal Russian History/Histoire Russe volume 30 numbers 1-2 (Spring-Summer 2003) on pages 1-22.

Sand is familiar with the first edition of my book "The Jews of Khazaria" and cites it in "The Invention of the Jewish People" on page 238. But it is the second edition of my book that carries the full extent of the research on Jewish demographics and origins, with its Chapter 10 (formerly numbered 11) sourcing the new genetic studies as well as the demographic and linguistic research of scholars like Alexander Beider.

My evidence disproves Sand's book's ideas about the origins of Ashkenazim and Sephardim, showing that the real story is that Ashkenazim and Sephardim have preserved a large amount of ancestry from ancient Israel to the present day.

For full details on my book, which is available from UK bookshops, visit http://www.khazaria.com/brook.html

POST A COMMENT

You must be logged in to post a comment.