Swedish blood libel is not just antisemitic, it's dumb
![]() | By Miriam Shaviv August 26, 2009 |
|
Freakonomics author Stephen Dubner explains in his New York Times blog why the "Swedish blood libel" - the accusation that Israel was deliberately killing Palestinians in order to harvest their organs - is physically and logistically unlikely:
Al Roth, the Harvard economist whose work on matched-pair organ donations has started to transform the organ-transplantation scenario, told me he found the accusation unbelievable because of the logistics of organ harvesting itself. “Organs don’t last very long and have to be matched rather particularly,” he said, “so it would be hard to take them on spec for an international market. So I think black market organs must mostly be from live donors. Live donors can take blood tests well in advance and travel to where the patient is. Deceased organs have to be put on ice, and the clock starts ticking immediately and fast.”
Another question: If you did kidnap someone in order to harvest their organs, would you really return the body to the family afterwards? Wouldn't that be incredibly stupid?
Just asking.
(Via)
COMMENTS
27 August, 2009 - 18:08 | I think Gideon Levy in Haaretz best sums up the situation when he writes: Over the years, the IDF has killed thousands of innocent civilians, among them women and children. The Shin Bet security service has tortured hundreds of people under interrogation, sometimes to death. Israel prevents food and medicine from reaching Gaza. Sick people are extorted by the Shin Bet to become collaborators in return for medical treatment. Thousands of homes in the territories have been demolished for nothing. Dozens of people have been killed by special units when they could have been arrested instead. Thousands of detainees have sat in jail for months or years without trial. Is that not enough to draw a reliable portrait of the occupation? Is that not shocking enough? |
MORE FROM THIS AUTHOR



viv green
27 August, 2009 - 11:59
Hi Miriam
Want to hear something just as dumb
Aftonbldet has a headline today saying
"The Israeli army is not Jewish"
Imlying that their average reader should know that Beduin and Druise people serve in the IDF and therefore should realise that the paper is not referring to a jewish blood libel when they read that the army steals organs.
This implies quite a lot of prior knowledge from an Aftonbladet reader - seeing that the editors of the paper say that they have never heard of the blood libel!
I've got to the point of laughing at them.