![]() | By Jonathan Hoffman
November 24, 2010 | Share |
http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/speech_chx_231110.htm
What a pleasure to read this after the Mick Davis drivel
![]() | By Jonathan Hoffman
November 24, 2010 | Share |
http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/speech_chx_231110.htm
What a pleasure to read this after the Mick Davis drivel
24 November, 2010 - 18:11 Rate this: 1 point | Happy Birthday to the Board of Deputies. I didn't like Osbourne's speech much, it was sycophantic and condescending. Especially this bit: "Like many, many people in this room we want to see the Israeli Government negotiate peace, and we urge upon them an end to settlement building, and an opening up of Gaza." No, Hamas need to be contained until we (i.e. the west) figure out what to do with them. THANK YOU Israel for keeping the rest of us safe from those genocidal maniacs and the brainwashed fools that elected them. As for settlement building - define a settlement Mr Osbourne. "East" Jerusalem? Tel Aviv? Where does it end? It's sickening. How would he feel if Israelis started lecturing us about Afghanistan? We're in no bloody position to talk. I'm utterly and completely disappointed by this government's sanctimonious attitude towards Israel. There. I've said it. Now for some cake. |
24 November, 2010 - 18:13 Rate this: 0 points | i don't believe it - telegramsam is being nice. I like it. |
24 November, 2010 - 18:19 Rate this: 0 points | I agree Matt - I hate those speeches where they make an insult sound like a compliment. What if Israel did begin lecturing us on Northern Ireland, Iraq and Afghanistan? There would be an indignant outcry. Yet people expect Israelis to be meek and bow and scrape before us, just because you throw them a few nicely vague words. Don't forget Cameron's Gaza "prison camp" jibe. That was simply disgusting. As you said, sickening hycorisy! |
24 November, 2010 - 18:50 Rate this: 0 points | Matt and Amber - I agree, that bit is not "superb" but one would not realistically expect thim to say anything else |
24 November, 2010 - 22:49 Rate this: 0 points | Yes Jonathan, but that just shows how low our expectations are in the UK concerning our political elites. |
24 November, 2010 - 23:13 Rate this: 1 point | amber: "i don't believe it - telegramsam is being nice. Don't get used to it - 3 days and he reverts to his usual vile self. Anyway, it's not how he says things; it's what he says. An anti-Semite who spends his days and nights dreaming up bad ideas about Israel, doesn't change his ways over night. |
24 November, 2010 - 23:19 Rate this: 0 points | Avraham, I am truly sorry to be such a disappointment by agreeing with Jonathan that Osborne's was a superb speech, echoing many of the things said by Mick Davis. |
25 November, 2010 - 09:28 Rate this: 0 points | If Ed Miliband made this speech would it also be superb? Maybe sometimes our local politics gets in the way of how we think or even hear. None of the main parties can do anything else but be mealy-mouthed about Israel because they have to appear to be 'honest brokers' and 'even-handed'. There are about 10 times as many Muslims in the UK as Jews and that ratio wordwide is far greater. Politicians are what they are. We can't expect them to be Zionists but we should expect them not to use inflammatory language like Cameron or the 'I'm-Jewish-and-my-grandparents-fled-the-Holocaust-but-look-I'm-not-in-the-pocket-of-the-Zionist-lobby'ism of Ed Milband. Tony Blair is the only true British statesman when it comes to Israel. Regardless of your domestic politics, or views on Iraq, I've never heard him say anything as objectionable as Cameron or Clegg. They can make as many speeches to Friends of Israel or the BOD or UJIA or the ZF as they like, but when it comes down to it, they are cowards fearful of upsetting certain elements at home and abroad, rather than telling it as it is. |
25 November, 2010 - 10:19 Rate this: 0 points | Ray, that's an excellent point you make. Do you think our communal organisations should cease to invite UK politicians as crowd-pullers -- with the exception, of course, of Tony Blair? |
25 November, 2010 - 10:58 Rate this: 1 point | Sam, of course not, I just don't think we should expect them to be Zionists, but I would like them to express more understanding of Israeli policy on Gaza, for example, rather than use the language of Israel's enemies. |
25 November, 2010 - 11:02 Rate this: 0 points | Ray, fair enough. But when it comes to politicians, of any stripe, all you are going to get are platitudes. |
25 November, 2010 - 13:07 Rate this: 1 point | Melanie Phillips calls Osbourne Israel's false friend. http://www.spectator.co.uk/melaniephillips/6490304/israels-false-friend....
The whole piece is an excellent analysis of what is wrong with HMG's analysis or lack thereof. On Israel, at least, there appears to be cross-bench agreement. Agreement to be purblind when it comes to the Palestinians. |
25 November, 2010 - 20:33 Rate this: 1 point | Melanie is right, as usual. That was also the sentence that caught my eye: |
25 November, 2010 - 20:37 Rate this: 1 point | "I've never heard him say anything as objectionable as Cameron or Clegg." Indeed. Or that vile Hague. "they are cowards fearful of upsetting certain elements at home and abroad" You don't mean the religion of pieces, by any chance? Those professional 'angry and upset' grievance merchants? |
25 November, 2010 - 22:35 Rate this: 0 points | @Yoni1 - I couldn't possibly comment. But arms sales, for eaxmple, are very lucrative when your economy is as it is. |
telegramsam
24 November, 2010 - 17:57
Rate this:
This is indeed an excellent speech, Jonathan. Thank you for posting it. I am unclear, however, where he differs from Mick Davis's views.
Does Mr Osborne not echo them here?
And this?
Is there anything here with which we cannot agree?