Stand for Human Rights


By newsmax
January 6, 2011
Share

Macy Gray, Performing in Israel is Already Political - Stand for Human Rights and Cancel!
Dear Macy Gray,

We are a group of Israeli citizens who support the Palestinian Call [1] for Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) on Israel, as a means of bringing to an end Israel's decades-long systematic oppression of the Palestinian people.

We are writing to you today to share with you our deep concern about your upcoming shows in Israel and urge you to cancel them. We know that you performed in Israel before, but some artists who come here are not fully aware of their performance's implications when they choose to do so. In recent months, artists such as Carlos Santana, Gil Scott Heron, Elvis Costello, Gorillaz Sound System, the Klaxons, the Pixies, Devendra Banhart, Faithless, Leftfield, and Tindersticks cancelled their scheduled shows in Tel-Aviv after familiarizing themselves with the current socio-political reality in Palestine/Israel. Film stars Meg Ryan and Dustin Hoffman, and film director Mike Leigh cancelled their scheduled appearances in Israel as well.

In 1948 Israel expelled and confiscated the land and property of about 800,000 Palestinians. They and their descendants are still denied return and compensation as sanctioned by the UN General Assembly Resolution 194. The remaining Palestinians have been put for years under martial law, and until now, constituting 20% of Israel's citizens, they are subjected to a systematic discrimination in violation of international law, and specifically, the crime of apartheid.

For decades, Israel has been keeping a population of four million Palestinians under martial law, and in the case of Gaza – a life-costing military siege. Palestinians living under Israeli military control have to endure house demolitions, the annexation of their agricultural fields and orchards, unlawful military invasions to their homes, and systematic denial of access to adequate medical services, high education and work; their villages are surrounded by checkpoints and a 26 ft. high wall, quashing their right to move freely, sometime even within their own villages. In the context of your show, this also means that a Palestinian girl, a fan of your music living under Israeli occupation, is not allowed by law – and denied by walls, fences and checkpoints - to come see you perform in Tel-Aviv.

The BDS campaign was launched by over 170 civil society organizations of all three parts of the Palestinian people: refugees, citizens of Israel and West Bank and Gaza residents. It received the support of almost the entire community [2] of Palestinian cultural workers. BDS's non-violent and human rights based campaign urges artists not to put their stamp of approval on Israel's system of often murderous ethnic discrimination. As such, an international performance in Israel is understood amongst the Israeli public as condoning this reality and making a statement against the necessity to change it.

Some artists who undermined the boycott and performed in Israel have asserted that they empathize with the suffering of the Palestinians but that they are "only coming to play music and not do politics"– that their message is a humane one, and that music dwells on a different realm from that of politics. However, when the time came for them to perform, regardless of their own opinions, regardless of the humane message they wished to bring with them, regardless of what they had said on stage - their performances were interpreted amongst the Israeli public opinion as an endorsement of Israel's policies and an approval of the situation.

A recent report [3] issued by Amnesty, Oxfam and other respected human rights organizations highlights the need for steady substantial pressure on Israel: "Following the Israeli announcement of steps to ‘ease’ the blockade, international attention shifted to the Israeli-Palestinian negotiations and the pressure from the international community to lift the blockade was also eased". International shows in Israel at this time elicit a message of 'business as usual' - that nothing has to be changed because things are fine the way they are. Many artists around the world have pledged their support for the cultural boycott of Israel, including Robert Del Naja [4] of Massive Attack, 180 Irish artists [5], 500 Montreal artists [6] and the international alliance Artists against Apartheid [7].

Coming to perform in Israel has become a political act, a statement of support for the state of Israel's ongoing crimes and human rights violations. It is also an act against a rapidly growing non-violent human-rights based civil society Palestinian movement. The question remains: is this a political act you wish to take part in?

COMMENTS

Jon_i_Cohen

6 January, 2011 - 15:14

Rate this:

4 points

Same old, same old, rubbish, don't you know that BDS is in decline.
The majority of artists simply ignore such propoganda.
For airheadmax's benfit some of the big names in music who performed in Israel during 2010:-
Neil Sedaka
Ozzy Osbourne
Jeff beck
Diana Krall
Rihanna
Joan Armatrading
Rod Stewart
Seal
Coldplay
U2
Elton John
Alan Parsons Project
Kool & The Gang
Metallica
Paul Anka
The only "big name" who cancelled was Carlos Santana, (who I was personally sad about), the rest of the cancallations were by has beens or non entitities that no one has heard of, so a big SO WHAT!


Joe Millis

6 January, 2011 - 15:17

Rate this:

0 points

U2 and Coldplay haven't performed in Israel, although I certainly would play to see them there.
You forgot Laughing Lenny Cohen.
Are Seal, Joan Armourplating, and the Alan Parsons Project still big names.


mattpryor

6 January, 2011 - 15:19

Rate this:

3 points

They also stand outside concerts showing pictures of dead babies and shouting "shame on you" at the bands' fans.

Yep, definitely fun people these boycotters.


Jon_i_Cohen

6 January, 2011 - 15:35

Rate this:

3 points

Joe
Cold Play and U2 are planning to come 2011 and it is rumoured that the Rolling Stones will do so too.
As for Leonard Cohen, yes, still a big name, and Seal, Joan Armatrading and Alan Parsons are bigger names than those that cancelled, (apart from Santana), and attracted big audiences.


Yoni1

6 January, 2011 - 16:08

Rate this:

5 points

"Stand for Human Rights and Cancel"

Signed:
Antisemitic twat

Promoted by:
Another antisemitic twat


Yoni1

6 January, 2011 - 16:09

Rate this:

4 points

Didn't know about Diana Krall. Bought her Look of Love CD only yesterday.
What a voice!
What a figure!
Part of me is getting bigger!


Yoni1

6 January, 2011 - 16:11

Rate this:

4 points

"Amnesty, Oxfam and other respected human rights organizations"

ROFL.
Those 2 antisemitic bodies are not 'respected' except by morons.
Oxtwat is in breach of its chraitable status due to its screeching anti-Israel propaganda.


jose (not verified)

6 January, 2011 - 16:22

Rate this:

3 points

Personally, I support the BDS of those foreign groups who come and take Israeli money and spend it elsewhere. This is divesting.
The more they boycott Israel, the more Israel invests in real projects, such as gas drilling, clean energies, desalination techniques, etc.

Let the stupid BDS supporters do their job. For once, it is good for Israel.


jose (not verified)

6 January, 2011 - 16:26

Rate this:

4 points

They and their descendants are still denied return

Why should their descendants be granted return, moron?
The 'Palestinians' have been paid a hundred times for their poor posessions, of which nearly none still exist today in its original form (I mean Jews had to invest much more to be able to live decently in those old houses).
Remember that their is no right of return in international law, except as wishful thinking. And it certainly doesn't apply to any descendants.
And if there was one, then the Jews would apply for it and claim not only little Israel but a good deal of Poland too.


amber

6 January, 2011 - 16:31

Rate this:

4 points

newsmax, you really are pathetic. You write your propaganda pieces, but never engage in any debate, knowing that you can't cut the ustard when any of your silly views are challenged.

You are a sad loser.


jose (not verified)

6 January, 2011 - 16:41

Rate this:

5 points

Newsmax is just a propagandist who is missioned to crosspost the 'Palestinian' propaganda news. He has not interest in discussing here.
These tactics are stupid for his terrorist friends because it attracts people to the JC website rather than the usual antisemite websites where this crap is usually published.
And on the JC websites, people can read much more than nutmax propaganda.

It's like a hoaxmonger posting on snopes his own hoaxes, where people can debunk them easily!


Jon_i_Cohen

6 January, 2011 - 16:45

Rate this:

4 points

Calm down Yoni, (but I agree about Diana Krall!)
I have previoulsy written to the Charity Commissioners about Oxfam, (or Oxtwats), and just received the standard "sorry but it's not in our remit to dictate policy of an individual charity".
But airheadmax and his lefty friends will no doubt carry on supporting it regardless of it's anti-semitic position.


Joe Millis

6 January, 2011 - 17:05

Rate this:

-1 points

I definitely would pay to see the Stones in Israel. And I am paying to see Aida at Masada.


jose (not verified)

6 January, 2011 - 17:16

Rate this:

1 point

I definitely would pay to see the Stones in Israel. And I am paying to see Aida at Masada.

Let's hope the BDS win, this time! LOL !


Yoni1

6 January, 2011 - 19:13

Rate this:

3 points

Jon, the charity commissioners are a bunch of professional quangocrats who have never done an honest day's real work in their lives, and usually have the brains of airmax. It is a statutory provision that charities must not engage in politics. Oxfam and several others should be stripped of their status (ditto the commissioners) and pay heavy backdated taxes, and this would have happened had we lived in a sane country with sane politicians who have a spine and balls.

POST A COMMENT

You must be logged in to post a comment.