Scum attack Ahava London again


By Jonathan Hoffman
November 22, 2010
Share

The ISM anti-Israel filth have attacked the shop again, reports Richard Millett who is on the spot. They have barricaded themselves in, shop closed, police cordon round it.

COMMENTS

telegramsam

22 November, 2010 - 13:12

Rate this:

0 points

Yesterday wasn't such a great success was it? You were warned that associating with the BNP/EDL might cause problems.


Yvetta

22 November, 2010 - 13:38

Rate this:

-1 points

Stop your silly taunting of a great guy, t'sam!


telegramsam

22 November, 2010 - 13:41

Rate this:

0 points

Taunting? Isn't that in Somerset?


Yvetta

22 November, 2010 - 13:42

Rate this:

-1 points

Baiting, then!


telegramsam

22 November, 2010 - 13:44

Rate this:

0 points

Baiting? That's a type of fish, isn't it?


telegramsam

22 November, 2010 - 13:45

Rate this:

-1 points

Anyway, I'm not one for conspiracy theories, but this follows mighty close on the heals of the Buycott's failure to attract any attention or success.


zair

22 November, 2010 - 14:32

Rate this:

-1 points

Ooh ooh Richard Millett, on the spot reporter for............Richard Millett, what channel is he on ;)


Robert Snodgrass

22 November, 2010 - 15:09

Rate this:

0 points

"Anyway, I'm not one for conspiracy theories, but this follows mighty close on the heals of the Buycott's failure to attract any attention or success."

Regardless of the success or failure of these boycott campaigns Sam, one thing is for certain, and that is in spite of people like yourself trying their hardest to put a financial strangle hold on the state of Israel, the Israeli economy is flourishing and growing at unprecedented levels. This may be a bitter pill to swallow for you and your followers but it is the reality.

Israel has been fighting for it's life since its conception, and these boycott campaigns do not scare her. If you want to do the boycott for real, stop using modern medicine, your computer and mobile phone, then we'll really see how committed you are to the cause. it's not that difficult to just give up a cherry tomato here and there.

Kindest regards

p.s. Your arguing technique is akin to my 4 year old nephew. "Taunting? Isn't that in Somerset?"...I wonder why no one takes you serious?.


yankeeuxb

22 November, 2010 - 15:17

Rate this:

0 points

I keep forgetting that the mobile phone, 20th / 21st Century medicine, the computer are all down to Israel.
Just think, without Israel we'd still be talking through a piece of string attached to two cans or using witchs' potions to cure our ills.

Anyway, the boycott is aimed at the illegal occupation and the companies that profit from the exploitation of occupied territory - against international law. Hence the emphasis on companies like Ahava that directly profit from the miseries of an occupied people.


jose (not verified)

22 November, 2010 - 15:46

Rate this:

1 point

The boycott is, like it Nazi predecessor, aimed at every "Jewish" company, not only those who are based in "occupied" territory (although it is difficult to know what is occupied until a frontier has been defined, isn't it?).

Some ultra-left racist group tried to go explicitely after Jewish shops in Italy, not only Israeli but Italian Jewish as well.

Let's hope the English racists will be jailed for some time.


jose (not verified)

22 November, 2010 - 15:48

Rate this:

2 points

It is evident that the hate campaign of the ultra-left led to the racist and illegal operation that we are witnessing.
If the government doesn't act quickly, antisemitism will reach record levels in England.


yankeeuxb

22 November, 2010 - 16:04

Rate this:

-2 points

How can it (or any criticism of the occupation for that matter) be anti-Semitic if some of the supporters of the boycott and of Palestinian human rights are Jewish?

The boycott is not targeted at 'Jewish shops’, it is targeted at companies that profit from the universally recognised illegal occupation and the universally recognised illegal settlements.


Robert Snodgrass

22 November, 2010 - 16:16

Rate this:

2 points

If Ahava was a Muslim owned Israeli Arab company, i would bet my bottom dollar there would be no boycott in operation. There must be something else....could it be the fact that it is owned by those of the Jewish faith?

One final thing, the reason we don't like Jews to criticise Israel in public is because our enemies use these words against us. The example you just gave of "How can it (or any criticism of the occupation for that matter) be anti-Semitic if some of the supporters of the boycott and of Palestinian human rights are Jewish?" is very fitting indeed.


jose (not verified)

22 November, 2010 - 16:31

Rate this:

1 point

if some of the supporters of the boycott and of Palestinian human rights are Jewish?

Please, not that sutpidity again! Since when "being Jewish" (by birth accident) makes one immune to the antisemitic disease ?
It's like saying that Dreyfus is guilty because some Jews believed in his guilt, by the way. The proof-by-Jew, so to speak.
Being antisemite is applying double standards: one for the Jews, another for let's say Muslims.

Who in this antisemitic crowd boycott Iran for its multiple violations of basic human rights, China for its occupation of Tibet, Saudi Arabia oil for its treatment of women, etc.

NONE !

Kid gloves for one, aggression for the other ====> RACISM.


zair

22 November, 2010 - 16:31

Rate this:

-4 points

'Scum' 'Filth' you are a hater through and through Mr Hoffman.


jose (not verified)

22 November, 2010 - 16:35

Rate this:

4 points

The only reason why Israeli companies are targeted is that they are Jewish-owned, no less.
Nazi behaviour, by the successors of Nazis: the ultra-left and the islamists, strange bedfellows considering the latter is more right-wing than the most extreme right-wingers in nearly any Western country.


Jonathan Hoffman

22 November, 2010 - 17:21

Rate this:

2 points

T-Scum-Filth

The BUYCOTT attracted around 200 people.
Great success.


telegramsam

22 November, 2010 - 18:21

Rate this:

-2 points

Is that how many people you counted walking around Monmouth Street, Jonathan? Strange that it took you 24 hours the crow about this alleged figure.


Avraham Reiss

22 November, 2010 - 18:32

Rate this:

0 points

yankeeuxb: " universally recognised illegal occupation and the universally recognised illegal settlements."

As big a liar and propagandist as tsam, if you aren't the same person.

When Israel signed Peace Agreements with Jordan and Egypt, they left Gaza and Judea/Samaria with Israel. So there's no occupation, and certainly nothing illegal. Isarel legally and justifiably posesses these territories, and only lack of knowledge of Judaism plus a certain Galut mentality "what will the non-Jews say?"
prevents total annexation of these areas by Israel. But that will come in time. The main thing is the facts on the ground; a quarter of a million settlers in J&S, which is too large a number to 'transfer out'.


telegramsam

22 November, 2010 - 18:40

Rate this:

-2 points

Avraham, the settlers were transferred in, they can be transferred out.


Avraham Reiss

22 November, 2010 - 18:48

Rate this:

2 points

what a stupid - and totally divorced from reality - comment.
"transferred in"? The first settlers fought the leftists government tooth and nail to settle there. And beat them every time.

Your hatred of them will one day bring you cancer, or some similar blessing to humanity. The bile of hatred in your body will sooner or later become a disease.


Yoni1

22 November, 2010 - 18:50

Rate this:

2 points

Well, Zair, you ARE scum,

'Illegal' occupation? LOL. Only a halfwit believes that nonsense.


Yoni1

22 November, 2010 - 18:53

Rate this:

2 points

"the settlers were transferred in"

Antisemites tell every lie in the book, don't they?

The settlements are entirely legal, and it has nought to do with 'Judaism'. All one needs is basic acquaintance with history, and 2 brain cells to rub together.


telegramsam

22 November, 2010 - 19:01

Rate this:

-1 points

Oh, avraham, I didn't know you cared. I see no fatwa from Ovadiah yet. Has he forsaken you? You poor thing, you, she'tichanek.


telegramsam

22 November, 2010 - 19:02

Rate this:

-1 points

The settlers were transferred in through financial incentives. No doubt these will be needed to transfer them out to the Negev or Galil where they are really needed.


amber

22 November, 2010 - 19:09

Rate this:

2 points

tspam just go and bury yourself in A HOLE SOMEWHERE.


amber

22 November, 2010 - 19:10

Rate this:

2 points

Zair, one sentence again. What a surprise.

You are an antisemitic scumbag.


Avraham Reiss

22 November, 2010 - 19:10

Rate this:

2 points

tspam, practically everything you say here is either from a hostile or perverted source, or is an outright lie.

"The settlers were transferred in through financial incentives."

Proof? And who the xxxx are you, Israel hater, to decide where people are "really needed" here? What do you know about our economy? What you read on Arab websites?


amber

22 November, 2010 - 19:11

Rate this:

2 points

yankeeuxb, how many Chinese products are you boycotting?

Anrisemitic hypocrite.


Avraham Reiss

22 November, 2010 - 19:14

Rate this:

1 point

Interesting to note that all the anti-Israeli scum here use aliases, afraid to express themselves under their own names. They themselves are ashamed of their own opinions. Tspam, yankeeusb, zair - Thank G-d there aren't as many as there were before JCWatch started creating order around here.

The Jewish Chronicle is slowly cleaning up up its act, but just not fast enough. I want to see it reach a point where the moderator is no longer scared to sign her real name as well.


Yoni1

22 November, 2010 - 19:18

Rate this:

2 points

"The settlers were transferred in through financial incentives"

You really have spectacular difficulties with the English language, don't you? I am told you can get remedial teachers on the NHS.

You cannot 'transfer' someone through incentives. Now go and watch the Teletubbies, they are more in your age bracket.


Yoni1

22 November, 2010 - 19:20

Rate this:

1 point

Yes, but let's not forget that Mr. 5%-wit himself claims that my name is an 'alias'.


telegramsam

22 November, 2010 - 20:58

Rate this:

-2 points

Yeah, JCWatch, the home of the criminally undermedicated, where Avraham Reiss tells everyone he has a direct line to Ayatollah Ovadiah Yossef who will issue a fatwa against the JC staff visiting Israel. Megalomanic nonsense.


Yoni1

22 November, 2010 - 21:52

Rate this:

1 point

Look who is talking about 'megalomaniac'. All 4'5" of him.

POST A COMMENT

You must be logged in to post a comment.