PSC created "false and misleading" information: So What's New, No Surprise There
COMMENTS
16 January, 2011 - 09:07 Rate this: -3 points | Hi "Andy responded to confirm that we no longer sell Ahava products, a decision which had been taken and implemented well before he received the PSC’s letter. This was a purely commercial decision." |
jose (not verified) 16 January, 2011 - 10:29 Rate this: 3 points | Huh, Waterdrop, while you can believe all silly fairy tales, the statement is: Please try to understand that there is a difference between dreams and reality. |
16 January, 2011 - 10:38 Rate this: 3 points | But Jose, have some pity: if he didn't have his wet dreams he would probably jump off a cliff ... But then again ... |
16 January, 2011 - 11:03 Rate this: 3 points | Waterman, your statement above makes no sense. You say that this was a commercial reason, but then go on to say that this was due to the product's alleged "illegality", and a great success for the BDS movement - even though the decision had nothing to do with the BDS movement. What? |
jose (not verified) 16 January, 2011 - 11:11 Rate this: 3 points | Amber, I think these guys prefer their daydreams to the plain reality. |
jose (not verified) 16 January, 2011 - 11:16 Rate this: 3 points | There is a fable by Jean de la Fontaine: It explains how a fly believes that it is making the horses pull the coach... |
16 January, 2011 - 11:19 Rate this: 3 points | waterman, could you clarify your position here? John Lewis has made clear that the PSC has twisted the facts to suit its own agenda, as detailed in Jonathan's link. Isn't such dishonesty offensive to you? |
16 January, 2011 - 11:22 Rate this: 3 points | waterman, could you please respond to my question on the other thread? |
jose (not verified) 16 January, 2011 - 11:29 Rate this: 2 points |
That is what I call a rhetorical question, amber! |
16 January, 2011 - 12:10 Rate this: -3 points | Hello Amber. The main thing is that Ahava is off the shelves,they deal in stolen goods and such dishonesty is offensive to me (to quote your own words Amber) |
16 January, 2011 - 12:48 Rate this: 2 points | "they deal in stolen goods and such dishonesty is offensive to me" I bet some of your best friends are Joos, eh, what? You are dishonest to the core. Israel is entitled to exploit the Dead Sea, and that is what Jew-haters like you can't stomach: Israel doing well is like poison in your soul. Well, long may this poison destroy you. |
jose (not verified) 16 January, 2011 - 13:13 Rate this: 3 points |
I perfectly understand why they ejected you from primary school! LOL! Even if one put reality under his nose (which it is) he would not recognise it! |
16 January, 2011 - 14:45 Rate this: -3 points | That the sale of the goods is illegal is certainly one good commercial reason for dropping them The only other good commercial reason for dropping them that I can think of is that they are crap I guess we will never know which it is |
jose (not verified) 16 January, 2011 - 15:03 Rate this: 3 points |
You didn't read what was written, Wheelchair? The products underperformed. That is a very good commercial reason. |
16 January, 2011 - 15:20 Rate this: -4 points | underformed is a polite euphemism for they turned out to be crap By the way re another thread ...move the arab population to jordan in the east and egypt in the west ... is that really what you have in mind ? |
16 January, 2011 - 15:22 Rate this: 3 points | John Lewis is entitled to make commercial decisions. One does not go into JL to buy upmarket beaty products, one goes into JL to buy washing-up bowls or buttons. The point of the article is that the PSC is mendacious to its core. It twists, lies and manipulates. |
16 January, 2011 - 15:22 Rate this: 4 points | waterman, on whay basis do you claim to speak for John Lewis' "real reason" as you put it? The dishonety here is that highlighted by John Lewis itself, which has said that the PSC has lied in its pronouncements. You claim to have a "rael reason". On what evidence? |
16 January, 2011 - 15:23 Rate this: 3 points | armchair, that is nonsense. It simply means they weren't selling enough, and may not have anything to do with the product's quality. |
16 January, 2011 - 15:25 Rate this: -2 points | ha ha ha Yonathan is that why the expense fiddling MP's all had their john Lewis lists ? |
16 January, 2011 - 15:26 Rate this: 3 points | waterman, you have not answered the question posed to you on the LSe blog. I will try again. Firstly, do you support a two state or a one state solution? And secondly, what do you think should happen to the Jews of the Jewish quarter of Jerusalem and the settlers who live in Judea and Samaria? Should they be kicked out? Please answer these two points specifically. |
16 January, 2011 - 15:27 Rate this: 2 points | armchair, do you think the PSC has been honest in its public pronouncements, or do you think John Lewis is lying? |
jose (not verified) 16 January, 2011 - 15:28 Rate this: 2 points |
No more but no less than any cosmetic, Wheelchair. All this is commercial, just admit it. You've lost!
No, that's you! The fact is that this is the only way to have peace while the 'Palestinians' don't want to negotiate unconditionally. |
16 January, 2011 - 15:28 Rate this: -3 points | Lets get real the john lewis partnership had stocked these products...they realised they were potential trouble ...they looked at the sales figures and concluded well no one is going to miss them anyways and we don't need the hassle lets say we just dump them |
16 January, 2011 - 15:34 Rate this: -2 points | well Amby let me just take a lil while to get over you typing that lil but inexpensive word " please " and maybe I might ok ? |
16 January, 2011 - 15:44 Rate this: -2 points | Amby I think more or less what I typed abovehe john lewis partnership had stocked these products...they realised they were potential trouble ...they looked at the sales figures and concluded well no one is going to miss them anyways and we don't need the hassle lets say we just dump them I thniNk the PSC tried to milk the situation as best they can, propaganda being an inbuilt element in campaigning The reality is that Ahava products are nothing to write home about, hardly anyone is fussed and they decided stocking them just wasn't worth the potential hassle. I think we will see an increasing number of such " commercial " decisions. And yes the PSC would like to portray this as a " boycott " when it isen't quite that. But all is fair in love, war and campaigning |
16 January, 2011 - 15:46 Rate this: 1 point | armchair, you say the PSC "milked " the situation - but were they dishonest, as John Lewis has stated? You say say there are numerous examples of such "commercial" decisions regarding Ahava - implying that you think they are based on politics rather than commerce. Can you give an example? |
16 January, 2011 - 15:47 Rate this: 2 points | armchair, you say the PSC "milked " the situation - but were they dishonest, as John Lewis has stated? You say say there are numerous examples of such "commercial" decisions regarding Ahava - implying that you think they are based on politics rather than commerce. Can you give an example of another situation? |
16 January, 2011 - 15:47 Rate this: 2 points | Personally, I find Ahava products of very high quality. |
jose (not verified) 16 January, 2011 - 15:57 Rate this: 2 points |
Did you ever make a difference between your wishes and reality, Wheelchair? |
16 January, 2011 - 15:58 Rate this: -1 points | no i said i think we WILL see I have to say I am highly impressed by the new polite reasonable Amby lets hope it lasts |
16 January, 2011 - 16:12 Rate this: -3 points | "My solution is status quo," ducks quack and dreamers dream I guess |
16 January, 2011 - 16:13 Rate this: -3 points | Amber, Your question posed at 15.26 was clearly answered by me earlier. I'm sorry if you do not understand. All other information you might need is in the link I sent you. I really appreciate you saying "please" though. |
16 January, 2011 - 16:16 Rate this: 3 points | "the sale of the goods is illegal" I don't think this Jew-hating moron was admitted INTO primary school. |
16 January, 2011 - 16:18 Rate this: 2 points | armchair, can you give another example? And was the PSC statement dishonest? |
16 January, 2011 - 16:18 Rate this: 3 points | "We know that in the Ahava HQ in Tel aviv they will be gutted" And this Jew-hating moron tells ME to keep taking the tablets! But then, 99% of all antisemites are schizophrenic. He is no exception: can't tell reality from his Jew-hating wet dreams. |
jose (not verified) 16 January, 2011 - 16:18 Rate this: 3 points |
Well, you quack like a quack, Wheelchair! |
16 January, 2011 - 16:19 Rate this: 2 points | waterman, with due respect, you have not replied toeither question. I'll ask again. Do you support a two state or a one state solution? In either case, what do you think should be done with the Jews who live in Jerusalem's Jewish quarter and in Judea and Samaria? |
16 January, 2011 - 16:20 Rate this: 2 points | If it walks like an antisemite, talks like an antisemite and quacks like an antisemite, it IS an antisemite. |
jose (not verified) 16 January, 2011 - 16:20 Rate this: 3 points |
What do you mean by "understand"? "fantasise"? "dream"? |
16 January, 2011 - 16:21 Rate this: 1 point | Amber, why on earth are you trying to debate rationally with a lying, hate-dripping, deranged antisemite? |
jose (not verified) 16 January, 2011 - 16:23 Rate this: 3 points | For the rest of the population, that with a brain and reading capacity higher than third grade, the PSC was accused to have published a misleading and dishonest statement. Like the Fly in the fable, the PSC believes it is the cause for everything bad that happens to Ahava... And of course, they never mention the good things. |
16 January, 2011 - 16:33 Rate this: 2 points | Yoni, I have noticed that both armchair and waterman attack Israel, but have not stated what solution they see for the region. I would like both to lay their cards on the table, so we know where we stand. |
jose (not verified) 16 January, 2011 - 16:37 Rate this: 3 points | Amber, they have no solution at all. Just dreams that were dreamt before and failed. |
16 January, 2011 - 17:03 Rate this: 2 points | Amber: |
16 January, 2011 - 17:24 Rate this: -3 points | Hi Amber, Re your posting at 16.19 |
jose (not verified) 16 January, 2011 - 17:44 Rate this: 2 points |
Like the Holocaust didn't happen? |
MORE FROM THIS AUTHOR
LATEST COMMENTS
- Advis3r RE: Shavuos Caption Competition
- Advis3r RE: Prisoners voting: time to ask who governs Britain (Express)
- Mary in Brighton RE: Shavuos Caption Competition
- Advis3r RE: Prisoners voting: time to ask who governs Britain (Express)
- suzanna RE: Prisoners voting: time to ask who governs Britain (Express)
jose (not verified)
16 January, 2011 - 08:30
Rate this:
What about the stupids who "witnessed" that Ahava products were boycotted?
Again and again, what they present us is propaganda!