Petraeus says Israel weakening the US


By moshetzarfati2
March 14, 2010
Share

According to a report in the respected Foreign Policy, General David Petraeus underlined his growing worries at the lack of progress in resolving the Israel/Palestine conflict. He said that there was a growing perception among Arab leaders that the U.S. was incapable of standing up to Israel, that CENTCOM's mostly Arab constituency was losing faith in American promises, that Israeli intransigence on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict was jeopardizing U.S. standing in the region, and that George Mitchell himself was (as a senior Pentagon officer later bluntly described it) "too old, too slow...and too late."
America has changed, thankfully.

No previous CENTCOM commander had ever expressed himself on what is essentially a political issue. But Petraeus wasn't finished: two days after the Mullen briefing, Petraeus sent a paper to the White House requesting that the West Bank and Gaza (which, with Israel, is a part of the European Command - or EUCOM), be made a part of his area of operations. Petraeus's reason was straightforward: with U.S. troops deployed in Iraq and Afghanistan, the U.S. military had to be perceived by Arab leaders as engaged in the region's most troublesome conflict.

While Petraeus's request that CENTCOM be expanded to include the Palestinians was denied ("it was dead on arrival," a Pentagon officer confirms), the Obama Administration decided it would redouble its efforts - pressing Israel once again on the settlements issue, sending Mitchell on a visit to a number of Arab capitals and dispatching Mullen for a carefully arranged meeting with Chief of the Israeli General Staff, Lt. General Gabi Ashkenazi. While the American press speculated that Mullen's trip focused on Iran, the JCS Chairman actually carried a blunt, and tough, message on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict: that Israel had to see its conflict with the Palestinians "in a larger, regional, context" - as having a direct impact on America's status in the region. Certainly, it was thought, Israel would get the message.
Israel didn't. When Vice President Joe Biden was embarrassed by an Israeli announcement that the Netanyahu government was building 1600 new homes in East Jerusalem, the administration reacted. But no one was more outraged than Biden who, according to the Israeli daily Yedioth Ahronoth, engaged in a private, and angry, exchange with the Israeli Prime Minister. Not surprisingly, what Biden told Netanyahu reflected the importance the administration attached to Petraeus's Mullen briefing: "This is starting to get dangerous for us," Biden reportedly told Netanyahu. "What you're doing here undermines the security of our troops who are fighting in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan. That endangers us and it endangers regional peace." Yedioth Ahronoth went on to report: "The vice president told his Israeli hosts that since many people in the Muslim world perceived a connection between Israel's actions and US policy, any decision about construction that undermines Palestinian rights in East Jerusalem could have an impact on the personal safety of American troops fighting against Islamic terrorism." The message couldn't be plainer: Israel's intransigence could cost American lives.

Israel is eating itself.

COMMENTS

Jonathan Hoffman

14 March, 2010 - 19:57

Rate this:

0 points

Only one thing matters and that is that the US government and Hillary Clinton in particular accepted and praised the Israeli plan to stop building on the West Bank for ten months and continue building in east Jerusalem.


Jonathan Hoffman

14 March, 2010 - 20:03

Rate this:

0 points

Your link doesn't work, almost certainly deliberately.

Mark Perry who wrote this article is a former personal adviser to Yasser Arafat!

Impeccable source ....not ....


moshetzarfati2

14 March, 2010 - 20:20

Rate this:

0 points

Oops, an HTML slip up. Thanks for pointing it out. It works now. And Parry is as good a source as anyone, especially those who take orders from Danny "the wise" Ayalon.


moshetzarfati2

14 March, 2010 - 20:23

Rate this:

0 points

Clinton and the administration did not praise the "freeze" - because they knew that Netanyahu and his fascist-fundamentalist-figleaf coalition wasn't to be trusted and that it was a bluff. All they said was that it was just a "step in the right direction".


Jonathan Hoffman

14 March, 2010 - 20:28

Rate this:

0 points

"Today's announcement by the government of Israel helps move forward toward resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict."

That's 'praise' to anyone who understands English


Jonathan Hoffman

14 March, 2010 - 20:29

Rate this:

0 points

Perry is also a Director of Conflict Forum which shills for Hamas.

I would say "there goes your credibility" - but there was none there to start with.


moshetzarfati2

14 March, 2010 - 20:32

Rate this:

0 points

It appears that anyone who disagrees with the party line from Israel is a "shill for Hamas" or an anti-Semite. No one believes those canards, especially since the bluff that is Israel's "freeze" in construction in the occupied territories has been uncovered and Israel's lack of desire for peace has been exposed as a lie.


moshetzarfati2

14 March, 2010 - 20:34

Rate this:

0 points

That's very faint praise indeed. In fact, "helps" shows that they don't trust or believe Bibi. And they were right not to. It came before they worked out that Bibi was being disingenuous at the very least (because they continued building in the occupied territories).


Jonathan Hoffman

14 March, 2010 - 23:52

Rate this:

0 points

Petraeus' staff confirm this story is BS


moshetzarfati2

15 March, 2010 - 07:26

Rate this:

0 points

Apparently not, Mr Hoffman.


moshetzarfati2

17 March, 2010 - 07:22

Rate this:

0 points

This has now been confirmed.


moshetzarfati2

17 March, 2010 - 17:46

Rate this:

0 points

Here's what Petraeus told the Senate Armed Services committee

The enduring hostilities between Israel and some of its neighbors present distinct challenges to our ability to advance our interests in the AOR [area of responsibility]. Israeli-Palestinian tensions often flare into violence and large-scale armed confrontations. The conflict foments anti-American sentiment, due to a perception of U.S. favoritism for Israel. Arab anger over the Palestinian question limits the strength and depth of U.S. partnerships with governments and peoples in the AOR and weakens the legitimacy of moderate regimes in the Arab world. Meanwhile, al-Qaeda and other militant groups exploit that anger to mobilize support. The conflict also gives Iran influence in the Arab world through its clients, Lebanese Hizballah and Hamas.

A credible U.S. effort on Arab-Israeli issues that provides regional governments and populations a way to achieve a comprehensive settlement of the disputes would undercut Iran's policy of militant "resistance," which the Iranian regime and insurgent groups have been free to exploit.

POST A COMMENT

You must be logged in to post a comment.