![]() | By Jonathan Hoffman
May 10, 2010 | Share |
http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/israel-gets-accepted-into-...
Today the 31 members of the OECD reportedly unanimously voted in favor of accepting Israel as a member.
And who is trying to block it?
http://richardmillett.wordpress.com/2010/03/17/whiskey-dips-and-human-ri...
Miri Weingarten of J-News, the IJV/J-Street close relation that was set up in London in March.
Here is the email she sent round today:
Hi all,
You will have already seen that Haaretz has reported a unanimous vote for
Israeli accession to the OECD this morning.FYI, the Palestinians hope to achieve a small technical delay based on a *legal
argument* (below) by getting the legal advisors of one of the MFAs of a
member country to request a legal opinion on this issue from the OECD legal
department, and asking that the accession process (due to be finalised May
27) be suspended until this legal question is answered.The bottom line of this argument is that the OECD would itself be breaching
the 4th Geneva convention if it admits Israel under current conditions (i.e
with settlement data, but without data on Palestinians in the OPT). By
including settlement data it has actually forced itself to apply the rules
of occupation (Geneva 4) to Israel, which include responsibility of the
Occupying Power for the welfare of the occupied population. The only way
that accession would be legal is a) if settlement/OPT data is totally
excluded [total disaggregation] or b) if data from both settlements and OPT
Palestinians is included.A brief based on this argument has been sent to all Ministries of foreign
affairs of member countries.The legal argument will now be important for press purposes. Please feel
free to send it around as another point of messaging to your lists.(There follows the legal argument)
*best
Miri--
Miri Weingarten, Director
JNews
60 Farringdon Road
London EC1R 3GA
Tel. xxxx
This surely puts the lie to any claim that J-News - or its close relations J-Street or IJV - have Israel's best interests in mind.


Yvetta
10 May, 2010 - 11:25
Rate this:
I'm worried about J Street's ability to pull the wool over the eyes of people who should know better - trawling Facebook recently, I noticed a suggestion by someone with some influence to establish a version of J Street in Australia.