Now it's Morocco's turn to destroy its Jewish heritage


By bataween
April 22, 2010
Share

First fundamentalists wish to turn the shrine of the Jewish prophet Ezekiel into a mosque. Now Morocco is being accused of destroying its Jewish heritage: One night during Passover, one of Morocco's oldest urban landmarks, the Jewish Benchimol hospital in Tangiers, was summarily demolished, without the knowledge and consent of the local Jewish community.

Jews of Moroccan origin worldwide are in shock, as are not a few non-Jewish Moroccans who care about their heritage. All are appalled at this official act of vandalism.

Moreover, people are upset at the underhand way it was done. Security guards on site had their mobile phones snatched away. Why did the demolition squads move in at one o'clock in the morning in the middle of the festival of Passover? The Moroccan newspaper Liberation, lamenting the destruction of Morocco's heritage, blames not just the local municipality for this act of historic vandalism, but accuses the local Jewish community for 'selling' the pre-colonial, 110-year-old hospital in order to raise money for its poor. But the deed was done while members of the tiny Jewish community were away.

"It is not just that this was a Jewish building which upsets me," says historian Ralph Toledano. "All destruction of historic heritage is an irredeemable loss. A heritage cannot be reconstituted." He had heard rumours that the local authorities had been wanting to demolish the building for some time. It is clear, however, that proper procedure was not followed. It appears that the governor of Tangiers, the wali, wanted to turn the site into a public park giving an unobstructed view of the adjoining ancient palace of Sultan Moulay Hafid.

"One must never despise rumours, they often become fact," Mr Toledano says. Rumour has it that the municipality has next set its sights on the Jewish cemetery of Dar el San’a, on rue du Portugal, opposite Bab America. The cemetery was an 18th century concession negotiated between the Sherifian king's representative and the Jewish community on the site of an old Portuguese fort.

The site measures more than a hectare, and commands a beautiful view over the straits. Mr Toledano is horrified at the thought that a site where venerable rabbis and community dignitaries are buried might be bulldozed. Moroccan officials have denied that the cemetery is under threat.

The example of the Benchimol hospital points to the vulnerability of sites of Jewish interest throughout the Arab world, where, with 99 percent of Jewish communities almost extinct, too few Jews remain on the ground to have any influence on the authorities. With the expansion of Arab cities hundreds of synagogues and scores of cemeteries are now prime property, eagerly coveted by developers.

The solution must lie in a greater role for UNESCO, as well putting unrelenting pressure on the local authorities to be more sensitive to the preservation of what is also their historic heritage.

Read more at Point of No Return (www.jewishrefugees.blogspot.com)
http://jewishrefugees.blogspot.com/2010/04/moroccan-jews-fear-for-future...

Sign the petition to save Ezekiel's shrine here:
http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/saveezekielstomb/

COMMENTS

DLeigh-Ellis

22 April, 2010 - 17:03

Rate this:

0 points

This is very upsetting, and does seem to have been underhand.. Please keep us updated on the story.


John Gold

22 April, 2010 - 23:56

Rate this:

0 points

In many ways they have set an example for Israel to follow in that they at least didn't bulldoze a building down while people where living in it....
And it begs the question what is more valuable (and sacred) someone's home, or a place of history and interest?

A press release from the International Solidarity Movement stated that:
"Rachel had been staying in Palestinian homes threatened with illegal demolition, and today Rachel was standing with other non-violent international activists in front of a home scheduled for illegal demolition. According to witnesses, Rachel was run over twice by the Israeli military bulldozer in its process of demolishing the Palestinian home. Witnesses say that Rachel was clearly visible to the bulldozer driver, and was doing nothing to provoke an attack." (15 March 2003)

Human rights organizations and the United Nations criticize the ongoing demolitions[4] of Palestinian homes as violating international law, and contend that Israeli governments actually use demolitions to collectively punish Palestinians[1] and to seize property for the expansion of Israeli settlements. [5][6]


bataween

23 April, 2010 - 06:04

Rate this:

0 points

John Gold, the two cases are quite different. In the hospital's case, the proper procedure was not followed and the demolition was carried out as if the authorities had something to hide. And there are hundreds of homes and offices as well as schools and clubs seized from Jews across the Arab world where the owners have not been compensated.
I wish the human rights organisations would take as active an interest in these abuses as they do in 'Palestinian' cases, but they don't seem to care about Jewish rights at all.


Jon_i_Cohen

23 April, 2010 - 07:14

Rate this:

0 points

John Gold
Your comment has nothing to do with the article posted here.
If you want to write about left-wing activists and pro-palestinian terrorist NGO's causing trouble in Gaza then start a blog, perhaps on the Guardian web-site.


John Gold

23 April, 2010 - 15:13

Rate this:

0 points

Bataween.

So there's a procedure that makes it fine to bulldoze thousands of people homes down?
Some people regard it as ethnic cleansing...

JICohen.

Why people like you & Hoffman bandie arounfd terms like 'trolls', 'lefties', 'liberals' etc, is beyond me...? It only shows narrow mindedness in my opinion, for the record I'm neither left nor liberal...


bataween

23 April, 2010 - 15:49

Rate this:

0 points

John Gold,
if they'd been acting according to the proper procedure, the Moroccan authorities should have served a demolition order on 15 March - but they didn't.
I hope you are suitably outraged.


Harvey

23 April, 2010 - 16:26

Rate this:

0 points

John Gold

Better still start a blog on Islam on Line or MPAC.
Your comments would be well received.


John Gold

23 April, 2010 - 21:02

Rate this:

0 points

Bataween..

The problem is with all of this, is that it reminds me of Shakespeare's 'The Merchant of Venice' where the Jew asks for his pound of flesh according to the letter of the law....
The same argument used for building on Palestinian land, and the same again used for owning (undeclared nuclear weapons), while pushing America and Europe to pressure other middle eastern countries not to have them..
Reason and humanity should always be put before the law, and there's a lot to be learnt from Christianity in this area of grace, truth and love - being more important that using laws to justify your means....

Bulldozing people's houses down are unacceptable regardless...


bataween

24 April, 2010 - 06:29

Rate this:

0 points

I see. Jews must give up their legal rights and become Christians, but Palestinians are not required to do either.


John Gold

24 April, 2010 - 19:46

Rate this:

0 points

no that isn't what im saying, but if that's how you understand it then so be it...

POST A COMMENT

You must be logged in to post a comment.