No Free Speech at Queens Belfast


By Jonathan Hoffman
October 17, 2010
Share

Professor Geoffrey Alderman has sent out the following Press Notice: "On 20 September 2010 I received an email from the Director of the Belfast Festival, Mr. Graeme Farrow, inviting me to join a panel convened to discuss “Conflict in the Middle East” as part of the 2010 Belfast Festival, held under the auspices of Queen’s University Belfast. Mr. Farrow’s exact words were: “I would be delighted if you would join our panel.” I was naturally pleased to accept this invitation. The panel discussion is due to take place on Monday evening, 18 October 2010, in Belfast. On Friday afternoon, 15 October 2010 I was shocked to receive an email from Mr. Farrow informing me that “a mistake” had been made in extending the invitation to me and that although I could join the audience the event was to go ahead without my panel participation. In effect, I was being “disinvited.”
In a series of email exchanges with Mr. Farrow I refused to accept this situation, and I have made it clear to him that I intend to travel to Belfast tomorrow and shall expect to participate fully as a member of the panel. I am frankly appalled at the way I have been treated, for which I hold Queen’s University, Belfast, responsible."

On the Panel with Alderman were Avi Shlaim and Beverley Milton Edwards. The latter was a founder of Conflicts Forum and believes in a dialogue with Hamas.

http://www.melaniephillips.com/diary/?p=1555

I gather that Alderman is going to Belfast tomorrow anyway and will insist on being on the Panel.

Could be interesting ...

COMMENTS

Macairt

18 October, 2010 - 10:22

Rate this:

0 points

Here is Farrow's email, if you want to protest:

g.farrow@qub.ac.uk


Anthony Posner

18 October, 2010 - 10:37

Rate this:

0 points

Subject: Is freedom of expression a mistake?
Date: 18 October 2010 12:29:24 PM
To: g.farrow@qub.ac.uk

Dear Mr Farrow,

Might we conclude following your email to Prof Alderman, that freedom of expression is some sort of "mistake"? Would we all actually be better off without it? I know that President Ahmadinejad thinks so, and he is a strident anti-zionist. Surely, he can't be wrong?

yours sincerely
Anthony Posner


Jonathan Hoffman

18 October, 2010 - 15:04

Rate this:

0 points

sent:

Dear Mr Farrow

Why was the invitation to Professor Alderman (tonight's Panel) rescinded?

Which of your university's statutes regarding freedom of expression was Professor Alderman found to offend?

Sincerely
Jonathan Hoffman


Jonathan Hoffman

18 October, 2010 - 16:03

Rate this:

0 points

The meeting is at 6.30. Alderman is in Belfast and has put to Farrowe two options: (1) he sits on a separate table from Shlaim and Milton-Edwards (2) the event is called off.

I will update this story here, as it develops tonight.


Jonathan Hoffman

18 October, 2010 - 17:41

Rate this:

0 points

Neither of Professor Alderman's options was accepted and he is sitting in the hotel in Belfast while the meeting proceeds at the University.

Please protest about this outrageous violation of free speech to the Vice Chancellor, Prof Peter Gregson:

Executive PA: Mrs Fionnuala Newton - (0)28 9097 5134

Secretary Mrs Monica Salomeia (0)28 9097 3131

E-mail: vc.office@qub.ac.uk


CarGo

19 October, 2010 - 11:29

Rate this:

1 point

What was the upshot of the event?
By the way, Ahmadinejad was wined and dined when in New York and was given an hour of airtime each on Larry King, Christiane Amanpour and Charlie Rose.
Carol Gould


telegramsam

19 October, 2010 - 11:43

Rate this:

0 points

Ahmadinnerjacket wined? Do the Mullahs know?


zair

19 October, 2010 - 13:18

Rate this:

0 points

Good, he is an extremist nutjob advocating the murder of civilians.

From his wikipeadia page:

he argued that according to Jewish religious law, every Palestinian in Gaza who voted for Hamas was a legitimate target. He articulated his position in a debate with Rabbi David J Goldberg in The Guardian's commentary section. [6] He argued that according to the Halakha "it is entirely legitimate to kill a rodef – that is to say, one who endangers the life of another – and this is true, incidentally, even if the rodef has not yet actually taken another life".

POST A COMMENT

You must be logged in to post a comment.