![]() | By Simon Rocker
September 14, 2009 | Share |
Predictably, a fair amount of criticism has greeted the new entry rules that JFS and other secondary schools have been forced to adopt after the Court of Appeal ruling which said that they could no longer use the Jewish status of parents to determine admissions.
Take the Jewish Tribune columnist Ben Yitzchok who in the latest edition, condemns the “stupidity” of the new religious test introduced by JFS, which is based on synagogue attendance and other practice.
To stand a chance of entry, children have to score a minimum three qualifying points (attending synagogue over all the High Holy Days and going to cheder or Jewish primary for two years will get you over the threshold).
The new system is “a sheer and utter mockery of basic Jewish values which must be resisted by all means”, Ben Yitzchok thunders.
But whatever the drawbacks of the new rules – and they are a headache for synagogue administrators who must arrange for parents to obtain a new certificate of practice testifying to their children’s observance - surely some religious observance would be better than none, from the Tribune’s point of view.


lesshaste
Thu, 09/17/2009 - 07:18
Rate this:
Can any JC reading lawyer explain how the JFS ruling fails to be applicable to all the Christian state schools the other way round? If it is racial discrimination to discriminate on the grounds of the Jewishness of a child's parents to bar a student from entering a school then surely all the Christian state schools in the country are at least committing indirect racial discrimination by barring Jews from entry. Is it not obvious that a school entry rule that requires you to have been baptised or for your parents to take you to church regularly, for example, will disproportionately effect people who are Jewish which is now defined to be a race for these purposes?