Mr Pollard: Did The JC online also keep silent about Libya's election to The UNHRC?


By Blacklisted Dictator
May 22, 2010
Share

I have criticized The BBC for not reporting Libya's election to The UNHRC. But it appears that The JC ONLINE also kept shtum.

Perhaps, Stephen Pollard can inform his readers..

(1) Was it an oversight on the part of The JC online?

(2) Was he aware of Libya's election but deemed it not newsworthy enough to appear as a report/blog?

(3) Is it not time that The JC Online employed a journalist who had a real interest in what is happening at the United Nations?

COMMENTS

Jon_i_Cohen

22 May, 2010 - 18:18

Rate this:

0 points

Come on Mr Blacklisted Dictator - who cares?
If you read my tongue-in-cheek posting on Thailand, you will see that this Libya situation is the same thing, as it was last year with Sri-Lanka, the year before that with massacres in Kenya.
If Israel and the Jews are not involved - No one cares!!


Blacklisted Dictator

22 May, 2010 - 22:31

Rate this:

0 points

Mr Cohen,

Mr Pollard does not think it is newsworthy. However, I beg to differ.
The hypocrisy of The UNHRC should be reiterated until we are blue in the face. And of course, the inclusion of Libya, adds further evidence to proving the case against Goldstone's Report.

By failing to publicly oppose Libya's election, The JC and BBC, unwittingly perhaps, become complicit in it.

POST A COMMENT

You must be logged in to post a comment.