![]() | By Jonathan Hoffman
January 13, 2011 | Share |
http://www2.lse.ac.uk/publicEvents/events/2011/20110113t1800vOT.aspx
You read it right. The motion "This House believes in an academic boycott of Israel" was decisively rejected on a show of hands. Of an audience of around 700, 55-60% voted against the motion.
The debate was co-organised by LSE Israel Society and LSE Palestine Society.
One can debate whether the Israel Society should have agreed to organise such a debate (since the motion assumes that Israel needs to be "punished", the only question being how).
But given that it did, much of the credit goes to the brilliant speaker against the motion, Professor Daniel Hochhauser, who took apart the odious John Chalcraft who tried to maintain the fiction that an academic boycott would be on institutions not people and spewd all the tired old slogans (eg "Zionism has a stock of colonial stereotypes").
Chalcraft supports Hezbollah:
http://hurryupharry.org/2011/01/09/why-dont-you-2/#comment-548293
http://www.engageonline.org.uk/blog/article.php?id=601
Incredible to think that he is entrusted with the teaching of young people.....


stellasolomons
14 January, 2011 - 09:44
Rate this:
LSE lectures, open to the public, send me brochures on thier lectures and three years ago, for a few months, several lectures were preaching the opposite. Professor Hochhauser has done us all a big big favour. Applause!