Libya's Bateau Provocateur


By Jonathan Hoffman
July 13, 2010
Share

There is absolutely no need for another superfluous ship to the Gaza Strip. Gaza is open to all civilian goods, a fact known the Libyan government.

Israel has already taken a major measure to improve conditions in Gaza. In a move called a “welcome development” by the international Quartet (US, EU, UN and Russia), on 20 June, the government of Israel decided to end all restrictions on the entry of civilian goods into Gaza. Now restrictions will be placed only on weapons, war materiel and items that can be used for military purposes. Still, it is important that all goods are checked to ensure that they are not on the restricted list of dangerous items.

Israel allows the transfer to the Gaza Strip of approximately 800 truckloads of supplies (15,000 tons) per week. The projected amount of supplies on the ship is less than the amount that Israel transfers to Gaza in a single day. This ship has nothing to do with humanitarian aid, and everything to do with creating a provocation.

2. The organisers of the ship have been invited to avoid an unnecessary confrontation by delivering their supplies to Gaza via Ashdod or El Arish.

Israel allows boats to offload their cargoes at Ashdod for transport to both the West Bank and Gaza after appropriate screening. Anyone truly interested in sending aid to residents of Gaza - as opposed to troublemaking - can use the existing overland channels, as do all the international organisations.

Recognising that “Israel has legitimate security concerns” the Quartet declared (21 June) that it “urges all those wishing to deliver goods to do so through established channels so that their cargo can be inspected and transferred via land crossings into Gaza. The Quartet emphasizes that there is no need for unnecessary confrontations…”

The US State Department issued (23 June) a similar statement to that of the Quartet, adding that “mechanisms exist for the transfer of humanitarian assistance to Gaza by member states and groups that want to do so. Direct delivery by sea is neither appropriate nor responsible, and certainly not effective, under the circumstances.”

That is why there is absolutely no need for any “humanitarian flotillas” to Gaza. So said (21 June) Tony Blair, when referring to Israel’s updated policy. The Quartet Envoy stated that “if we implement this policy so that the things that people are trying to bring in by flotilla you can bring in through the legitimate existing crossings, do it that way. That is the more sensible way to do that.”

Just last Friday (9 July), the EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy expressed her apprehension regarding more ships headed for Gaza: "I am concerned about reports of further ships carrying humanitarian aid to Gaza. I would like to call on all of those involved to exercise calm and restraint at this particular juncture…. An escalation of tensions and unnecessary confrontations should be avoided.”

3. The purpose of the ship is to create a provocation and to open a sea lane to Gaza that will allow free reain to weapons and terrorists.

The ship is nothing more than an attempt by extremists to sabotage the peace efforts being led by PM Netanyahu and President Obama.

The proof of the fact that the goals of the organizers of the ship are political can be found in their own words. The Gaddafi Foundation published (11/6) on its website a notice reading: "Had our destination been the El Arish port, we would have spared ourselves the time and the effort, given money and sent a land convoy as we did last year."

A potential threat has already been conveyed in the words of a passenger. Atzam al-Sudani stated in an interview to al-Jazeera television that: “As Muslims, we are not afraid of death. On the contrary, we love shahida” [a martyr’s death for Allah’s sake].

4. Israel acts in accordance with international law. The maritime blockade off the coast of Gaza was established in accordance with international law and conventions. It is designed to prevent the large-scale smuggling of weapons to be used against Israel by Hamas. As Tony Blair noted (9 June) "There's no question that there are rockets fired from Gaza and that there are people in Gaza who want to kill innocent Israelis. When it comes to security, I'm 100 percent on Israel's side. Israel has the right to inspect what goes into Gaza."

5. Gilad Shalit: While Israel has taken a major step forward in improving the quality of life of Palestinians in Gaza, the abducted soldier Gilad Shalit has yet to receive any humanitarian assistance. Shalit has been held captive by Hamas for over 4 years, and has not even been allowed a single visit by the Red Cross.

COMMENTS

mattpryor

13 July, 2010 - 13:13

Rate this:

1 point

Thank you Jonathan.

It seems to me Ghadaffi is doing a good job in permanently discrediting these aid flotillas once and for all.


Jon.

13 July, 2010 - 13:41

Rate this:

-1 points

Hi Jonathan
Can i just query your first point? (sentence 2). You state:

"Gaza is open to all civilian goods, a fact known the Libyan government. "

However according to the official Israeli statement on the loosening of the blockade they state that prohibited items include:

Safety Glass
Drills
Epoxy Resin
Fiberglass
Vessels (A pretty broad term)

So surely your first point is inaccurate. More feedback as and when I've digested the article.


Jon_i_Cohen

13 July, 2010 - 14:18

Rate this:

1 point

Just for all to be clear "Jon." posting above is not me.
For the benefit of "Jon." Gaza is open to all goods - EXCEPT those that can be misused for military purposes such as the goods you have listed and provided the containers are checked and inspected prior to entry.
Upwards of 100 truck loads now go in weekly, with, as stated in the artcle above, some 15,000 tonnes of goods, so as i have previously written "What humanitarian crisis - there is no humanitarian crisis in Gaza". .
Who needs to eat safety glass or epoxy resin?
Perhaps you should be campaigning for Hamas to allow the Gaza population to have access to basics such as newspapers, before you start on other matters.
The IDF has already made contact with the Libyan agitators 100 miles off the coast, they have been given a deadline of midnight to change course.


Jon.

13 July, 2010 - 14:34

Rate this:

-1 points

Hi Jon C.

Actually the goods listen above are on the banned dual use good list (appendix A) as opposed to the possibly allowed if for PA approved, internationally inspected projects (appendix B) and are therefore just straight up banned.

I would say that building materials are 'basics'. True, you can't eat them but if you don't mind me saying that is a slightly fatuous point; you can't eat syringes, house bricks or petrol either but they are pretty important.


Jonathan Hoffman

13 July, 2010 - 19:05

Rate this:

1 point

Jonathan Hoffman

13 July, 2010 - 20:54

Rate this:

0 points

http://www.mererhetoric.com/2010/07/13/libyan-jihadist-on-gaza-bound-shi...

Jihadi on the boat:"We’d Love To Die As Shahids"


Jonathan Hoffman

14 July, 2010 - 04:30

Rate this:

1 point

http://muqata.blogspot.com/

We have reports from overnight that the engine on the Amalthea is damaged and that is why they are going so slow, and their GPS is intermittently down for reasons unknown.

AP is reporting that 4 IDF Naval boats stopped the ship. IDF sources do not confirm this report.


Jon_i_Cohen

14 July, 2010 - 10:48

Rate this:

0 points

http://uk.reuters.com/article/idUKTRE66C2VR20100714

Reuters reports that the ship is now on course for Egypt, so looks like a confrontation will be avoided.


Joshua18

14 July, 2010 - 13:10

Rate this:

1 point

"I would say that building materials are 'basics'."

Yes, and it's outrageous that Britain didn't supply them to Germany during World War II.


Joshua18

14 July, 2010 - 13:11

Rate this:

1 point

"and their GPS is intermittently down for reasons unknown."

"For reasons unknown." Ha ha ha.


Jon_i_Cohen

14 July, 2010 - 13:17

Rate this:

0 points

With Libya having a land border with Sudan where people are actually starving if the Gadaffi's have aid to chuck about why don't they make better use of it where it is really needed, with their neighbours in Sudan?
Silly me, that wouldn't get any world headlines would it? nor would the Guardian readers be able to bang on about it!
Neither would it provoke Israel, so what would be the point of genuine humanitarian aid? No point!

POST A COMMENT

You must be logged in to post a comment.