jaw dropping admission from Melanie Philips


By Armchair Quarterback
January 11, 2011
Share

In her comment Melanie Philips disputes the claim that there are seven million Palestinian refugees and then states the following...

"The seven-million figure is formed by adding the descendants of the Arabs who left. But the idea that subsequent generations are entitled to "return" to homes they never knew (and which therefore cannot be "their" homes at all) is ludicrous, and is, accordingly, unheard of anywhere else."

Now most of you will be as gob smacked as me but some may be a little slow so I will help them.

Where does that leave Israel and it's right of return and the homeland of the Jewish people stuff.

Do we now have to acknowledge that virtually all the Jews in Israel have not returned home since it is a home they never knew ( and which therefore cannot be " their " homes at all ) ?

The Arab refugees at least can claim to be very recent descendants of people for whom it was their home. How many Israeli Jews can claim the same ?

I personally find all these arguments irrelevant and entirely counter productive, we are where we are let's move on. But nonetheless a remarkable shooting of ones own foot by someone some bloggers on here claim has a razor sharp mind.

koff

COMMENTS

Watchful Iris

11 January, 2011 - 17:47

Rate this:

-1 points

Yeah.."we need more spokespeople with this clear insight."

*eyeroll*


Yoni1

11 January, 2011 - 17:56

Rate this:

0 points

To help the slow-of thinking, i.e. the 2 morons above:

The Arabs are free to return to their original country. It's NOT Israel: it is Saudi ARABIA.


Armchair Quarterback

11 January, 2011 - 18:03

Rate this:

-3 points

Is that because Arab and Saudi Arabia both have an upper case A in them ?


Watchful Iris

11 January, 2011 - 18:03

Rate this:

-2 points

Who gave you the point?....Yoni or Jonathan?


Watchful Iris

11 January, 2011 - 18:18

Rate this:

-2 points

Well at least we can say there's nothing wrong with Melanie's math....


amber

11 January, 2011 - 18:23

Rate this:

3 points

armchair, this is a common mistake. The Jews do not return to Israel as refugees. They return to Israel because it is their ancestral homeland - and only theirs. The area has only ever been an independent entity when it was a Jewish state - it has never been a state of any other nation at any time in history. In other words, the Jews have a unique claim to it.

"Palestinians" (who include a large proportion of Arabs from Egypt, Syria and other neighbours) are the only people on earth who are afforded refugee status on a hereditary basis - this is quite deliberate, in order to keep the problem alive. It has also been the excuse of the neighbouring Arab states to stop assimilating them for the past 6 decades.


Armchair Quarterback

11 January, 2011 - 18:28

Rate this:

-3 points

Yeah but Melanie tells us that ancestral arguments are irrelevasnt to the arithmetic. Amby I hope you and Melanie are not gonna fall out over this


jose (not verified)

11 January, 2011 - 18:33

Rate this:

1 point

Very good points, amber.

I add that the neigbouring Arab states don't have to assimilate 'Palestinians' since they are all Arabs with no distinct language, culture or ethnicity. Maybe some slang words are different...

A second point is that, not only the definition of a 'Palestinian' refugee is racist (ie inherited by right of birth), it is also sexist (the descendant of a female refugee are not considered as refugees).

UNRWA is the only racist and sexist organisation sponsored by the UN with our tax dollars, euros and shekels.


Watchful Iris

11 January, 2011 - 18:35

Rate this:

-2 points

Off topic....back to Melanie....


jose (not verified)

11 January, 2011 - 18:36

Rate this:

1 point

So there a no more than 100,000 real 'Palestinian refugees' today and in 30 years, the problem will be solved forever.
The only change needed is to transfer UNRWA responsibilities to UNHCR. Then the UN costs will dramatically fall.


Watchful Iris

11 January, 2011 - 18:42

Rate this:

-2 points

Off topic.


Yoni1

11 January, 2011 - 18:43

Rate this:

0 points

"Is that because Arab and Saudi Arabia both have an upper case A in them?"

Well, that's Nil Points for our resident illiterate, who has now failed History 100.00001.


Yoni1

11 January, 2011 - 18:45

Rate this:

0 points

"UNRWA is the only racist and sexist organisation sponsored by the UN with our tax dollars, euros and shekels."

But hardly the only utterly corrupt one.

Who organises the racist Durban conferences, btw?


Armchair Quarterback

11 January, 2011 - 18:45

Rate this:

-3 points

Yonithan if I wasn't a live and let live person I would give you a negative point for that


Watchful Iris

11 January, 2011 - 18:46

Rate this:

-2 points

Yonithan and Armchair, you're both off topic.


Watchful Iris

11 January, 2011 - 18:46

Rate this:

-3 points

Yonithan and Armchair, you're both off topic.


Armchair Quarterback

11 January, 2011 - 18:47

Rate this:

-1 points

sorry


Yoni1

11 January, 2011 - 18:48

Rate this:

-1 points

Put a sock in it, Myopic. A smelly one.


Armchair Quarterback

11 January, 2011 - 18:48

Rate this:

0 points

sorry


jose (not verified)

11 January, 2011 - 18:48

Rate this:

5 points

It is perfectly on-topic, Myopic. The fact that there are not really 7,000,000 refugees (in fact even UNRWA counts half of these, because of the sexist rule, so that was also perfectly on-topic). There are about 100,000 refugees due to natural attrition.
All refugees are today older than 64 years. And in 30 years, nearly none will be left and no "right of return" (a fiction that no refugee was ever granted) will ever happen.
So bye-bye "Palestine from Jordan to the sea" and bye-bye East Jerusalem.


Watchful Iris

11 January, 2011 - 18:53

Rate this:

-3 points

Off topic.


Joe Millis

11 January, 2011 - 19:14

Rate this:

-1 points

If he's not yoni ish hoff he's yoni ach-shel


amber

11 January, 2011 - 19:14

Rate this:

2 points

er...no she doesn't armchair. I really can't help you if your impoverished intellect is unable to keep up.

Why is this so difficult for you to understand? Israel is the homeland of the Jews, and no-one else. It has never been anyone else's.


Armchair Quarterback

11 January, 2011 - 19:18

Rate this:

-3 points

Is this the jc blog or a catholic confessional for the day ?

Amby I guess we better convey your admission to the 1.5 million non jewish israelis


Yoni1

11 January, 2011 - 20:14

Rate this:

0 points

What is that idiot Millis burbling about now?

So, the factual statement "Israel is the homeland of the Jews, and no-one else" gets negative marks from two morons. And they probably claim not to be antisemites.


Yoni1

11 January, 2011 - 20:15

Rate this:

0 points

And the idiot Iris has delusions of being our head teacher.


Armchair Quarterback

11 January, 2011 - 20:27

Rate this:

-4 points

You really are hung up on this marks business aren't you yonithan ?

Its just as well you aren't me you would never make it through the day....yes yes Iris I know ...off topic back to Melanie


Armchair Quarterback

11 January, 2011 - 21:39

Rate this:

-4 points

Julie desperately needs a hobby The disgusting assumption that she thinks she can reduce the Jewish people to a hobby The woman is sick sick sick


Armchair Quarterback

11 January, 2011 - 21:46

Rate this:

-1 points

What is more depressing is that there are Jewish idiots that fall for it

Just tell her that her deep rooted issues are her issues and please don' drag us Jews into it


amber

11 January, 2011 - 21:56

Rate this:

1 point

armchair, Israel is a Jewish state. That is not to say that you have to be Jewish to be a citizen.

You're quite thick, aren't you? Your level of "debate" is truly pathetic - you are consistently pounded into the ground.

I take it you have backed down on your previous absurd claim comparing Israel's laws of return for Jews to concocted hereditary refugee status.


amber

11 January, 2011 - 21:57

Rate this:

1 point

armchair, are you capable of writing a coherent argument?

Did you get past GCSE?


Armchair Quarterback

11 January, 2011 - 22:02

Rate this:

-2 points

Amby what do Americans know about GCSE ?


Yoni1

11 January, 2011 - 22:13

Rate this:

1 point

The point is not the marks, quarterdick - the point is that idiots like YOU are so hung up on them that they keep awarding minus marks to factual statements they refuse to accept, because they clash with their demented delusions. Got it? I doubt it.


Armchair Quarterback

11 January, 2011 - 22:16

Rate this:

-4 points

Yonathan the day I award marks to internet blogs plus or minus you have my permission to shoot me


Yoni1

11 January, 2011 - 22:29

Rate this:

3 points

I am not Yonathan, thicko.


Armchair Quarterback

11 January, 2011 - 22:39

Rate this:

-5 points

ok so who is yonathan ? The poeple want to know


jose (not verified)

12 January, 2011 - 10:39

Rate this:

2 points

Repeating off-topic won't make it so, Myopic Iris. The number of 'Palestinian refugees' is perfectly on topic here, as it is the one introduced in the post by your buddy Wheelchair Quarterbrain.
Then, as far as the real notion of refugees is concerned, that is the UNHCR one, there are no more than 100,000 'Palestinian' refugees in the whole wild world and there will be every year less of them. In thirty years, the youngest of them will be 94. And then, no right of return for refugees was ever granted by anyone, including UN.


Yoni1

12 January, 2011 - 11:06

Rate this:

2 points

And the idiots continue to give minus points to a perfectly factual statement as the one just above.
It IS on topic, and there ARE no more than 100,00 so-called 'Palestinian' refugees, and NO 'right of return' was granted to any other group by the antisemitic UN.


jose (not verified)

12 January, 2011 - 13:56

Rate this:

4 points

Wheelchair has nothing but antisemitism as an education. He does not even care a dime about 'Palestinians'. He just pretends that when he can blame Israel. He will never blame the 'Palestinians' when HAMAS throws them from the building roofs.

Double standards are a sure sign of antisemitism.


jose (not verified)

12 January, 2011 - 14:03

Rate this:

4 points

So, we only have a coward giving negative points to factual statements and an antisemite pretending to support 'Palestinians' but only when he can blame Israel.

Nice pair!


Anonymous

12 January, 2011 - 17:01

Rate this:

0 points

Comments for this page are now closed.

LATEST COMMENTS