Helen Thomas and Free Palestine Organisation have the same speech writer


By raycook
June 21, 2010
Share

The world now knows that Helen Thomas, doyenne of the White House press corps was interviewed earlier this month (see http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nc4OeRu7cfs).

Thomas, of Lebanese extraction, said that the Jews should 'get the hell out of Palestine'. When asked where they should go, she said they should go back to Germany, Poland, America and elsewhere. She was subsequently sacked from Hearst newspapers for her remarks.

Now, Helen Thomas is quite entitled to object to the Israeli presence in the West Bank and to settlements. What she appeared to be guilty of was saying that Jews should leave Palestine (and it is not clear what she meant by 'Palestine') and return to two countries which were largely responsible for the deaths of 6 million during the Holocaust.

This is insensitivity to put it mildly. If she were implying that Jews as settlers should leave Palestine/the West Bank, then why did she not say they should settle in Israel rather than 'get the hell out'. There was a clear implication that she did not believe Jews have the right to settle even in Israel and that they are ALL settlers from Europe, America and elsewhere.

Helen Thomas's remarks were echoed by a fellow Lebanese, as reported in the Jerusalem Post in an article about the Lebanese all woman flotilla which now, apparently, is not going to sail after all (see here).

In an interview with Hizbullah's al-Manar television station,

Yasser Kashlak, a Syrian businessman of Palestinian descent who heads the “Free Palestine Organization” and is funding this boat, as well as another that is to carry journalists and parliamentarians, said .... that he was more and more optimistic that one day these same boats would take “Europe’s refuse [the Jews] that came to my homeland back to their homelands.

“Gilad Schalit should go back to Paris and those murderers go back to Poland, and after that we will chase them until the ends of the earth to bring them to justice for their acts of slaughter from Deir Yassin until today.

So the Jewish people are 'Europe's refuse' and should somehow go back, presumably even those who have lived in Israel/Palestine uninterrupted for hundreds of years.

But Mr Kashlak, like Helen Thomas, conveniently failed to mention that in 1948 and subsequently as many as 900,000 Jews from Arab states were expelled or forced to leave due to persecution, and stripped of their property, businesses and money simply for being Jews. Approximately half of all Israelis are of Mizrahi Arab descent.

Many of them, naturally, fled to Israel. So does Mr Kashlak expect these Jews and their descendants to return to Egypt, Lebanon, Iraq, Yemen, Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Libya and Syria? Does he think these countries would accept hundreds of thousand of Jews? If not, where would he like them to go? But he is going to chase them to the ends of the Earth anyway, which seems a bit silly. Why expel them and then chase them, why not just murder them in their homes in Israel.

He wants Gilad Shalit to go back to Paris. I'm sure Gilad Shalit would be happy to go anywhere at the moment, but he can't as he is being held as a prisoner of war by Hamas without access to the Red Cross in direct transgression of the international laws that Hamas and Hizbullah are so keen to accuse Israel of breaking.

So for those who would deny the Jews their rights to self-determination in their ancestral homeland the choice is clear: exile or extermination. And if you chose the former, we'll come after you anyway. This should not be surprising when Hizbullah, like Hamas, is dedicated to the destruction of Israel and all Jews.

You can find the Hizbullah 'charter' here. But here's a taste of it:

Therefore our struggle will end only when this entity is obliterated. We recognize no treaty with it, no cease fire, and no peace agreements, whether separate or consolidated.
We vigorously condemn all plans for negotiation with Israel, and regard all negotiators as enemies, for the reason that such negotiation is nothing but the recognition of the legitimacy of the Zionist occupation of Palestine. Therefore we oppose and reject the Camp David Agreements, the proposals of King Fahd, the Fez and Reagan plan, Brezhnev's and the French-Egyptian proposals, and all other programs that include the recognition (even the implied recognition) of the Zionist entity.
Therefore our struggle will end only when this entity is obliterated. We recognize no treaty with it, no cease fire, and no peace agreements, whether separate or consolidated.
We vigorously condemn all plans for negotiation with Israel, and regard all negotiators as enemies, for the reason that such negotiation is nothing but the recognition of the legitimacy of the Zionist occupation of Palestine. Therefore we oppose and reject the Camp David Agreements, the proposals of King Fahd, the Fez and Reagan plan, Brezhnev's and the French-Egyptian proposals, and all other programs that include the recognition (even the implied recognition) of the Zionist entity.

Sounds a tad uncompromising to me. Oh well, maybe Hamas can do better:

"Israel will exist and will continue to exist until Islam will obliterate it, just as it obliterated others before it." (The Martyr, Imam Hassan al-Banna, of blessed memory).

"The Islamic Resistance Movement believes that the land of Palestine is an Islamic Waqf consecrated for future Muslim generations until Judgement Day. It, or any part of it, should not be squandered: it, or any part of it, should not be given up. "

"There is no solution for the Palestinian question except through Jihad. Initiatives, proposals and international conferences are all a waste of time and vain endeavors."

"After Palestine, the Zionists aspire to expand from the Nile to the Euphrates. When they will have digested the region they overtook, they will aspire to further expansion, and so on. Their plan is embodied in the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion", and their present conduct is the best proof of what we are saying."

...

"The Day of Judgement will not come about until Muslims fight the Jews (killing the Jews), when the Jew will hide behind stones and trees. The stones and trees will say O Muslims, O Abdulla, there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him. Only the Gharkad tree, would not do that because it is one of the trees of the Jews." (related by al-Bukhari and Muslim).

Well, that, if anything is even worse. They want to murder all Jews. But that's genocide! So let's send humanitarian boats to help them achieve their objectives by breaking the maritime blockade and letting in arms and missiles.

COMMENTS

Yvetta

23 June, 2010 - 08:03

Rate this:

1 point

I've never seen an honest report yet on Al Beeb or its website that tells the public precisely how murderous the intent of Hamas and Hezbollah are. It's quite scandalous that the public are kept in ignorance of precisely what Israel faces.


Jon_i_Cohen

23 June, 2010 - 08:15

Rate this:

0 points

Yvetta
You are right. It is down to bloggers like you to keep writing in and telling them as it is!
I am in a continuous dialogue with the Head of The Middle East desk on the BBC Web Site, named - Tarik Kafala, doesn't that speak volumes!!


Yvetta

23 June, 2010 - 21:13

Rate this:

0 points

Oh yes, Jon - and the other depressing thing is that the BBC News online people, to judge from their group photo which was posted there once, are all 20/30-somethings, and probably immersed in post-1967 Israel vilification by the MSM from childhood.


happygoldfish

24 June, 2010 - 10:56

Rate this:

1 point

Jon_i_Cohen: … the Head of The Middle East desk on the BBC Web Site, named - Tarik Kafala, doesn't that speak volumes!!

isnt that just racist prejudice? why should jc readers automatically assume that the bbc is wrong to appoint someone with an apparently muslim name?

a quick google search shows many cases of tarik kafala defending himself against complaints of being too fair to israel

for example, http://heathlander.wordpress.com/2009/07/15/gettin-all-up-in-the-bbcs-face/ and http://members5.boardhost.com/medialens/msg/<1276777625.html

Jon_i_Cohen: I am in a continuous dialogue with [him] …

i suppose you make it clear to him that you don't like his name?


Jon_i_Cohen

24 June, 2010 - 11:08

Rate this:

0 points

"being too fair to israel" ? in who's opinion?
It is not his name I don't like it is his views, do your "google search" you will see that they do not report the news; you will see that almost every article written by them ends with a subjective opinionated comment referring to:-
"Israel's illegal occupation of the West Bank"
"Israel's illegal occupation of Jerusalem"
"Israel's illegal blockade of Gaza"
It is their subjective opinions that I take issue with, the BBC should be reporting news,not making news as they see it.


happygoldfish

24 June, 2010 - 11:28

Rate this:

1 point

Jon_i_Cohen: "being too fair to israel" ? in who's opinion?

in the opinion of the people making the complaints to him, as you'll see if you bother to read the links above

Jon_i_Cohen: it is not his name I don't like it is his views, …

then what did you mean by …

Jon_i_Cohen: … named - Tarik Kafala, doesn't that speak volumes!!


jose (not verified)

24 June, 2010 - 13:52

Rate this:

0 points

"in the opinion of the people making the complaints to him"
To a genocidal murderer, the opinion of a simply biased journalist would be "too fair to Israel".


jose (not verified)

24 June, 2010 - 16:03

Rate this:

0 points

Original quote by Jon:

I am in a continuous dialogue with the Head of The Middle East desk on the BBC Web Site, named - Tarik Kafala, doesn't that speak volumes!!

Stated like this, it is ambiguous if it is the name that "speak volumes" or if it is the fact that Jon is in continuous dialogue (and from context, expressing dissent), thus that the Head of the Middle East desk more than often expresses anti-Israel opinion.

Of course, quoted like this:

Jon_i_Cohen: … the Head of The Middle East desk on the BBC Web Site, named - Tarik Kafala, doesn't that speak volumes!!

or even worse, like this:

Jon_i_Cohen: … named - Tarik Kafala, doesn't that speak volumes!!

that changes the ambiguous statement into a very explicit one. But is that fair?

POST A COMMENT

You must be logged in to post a comment.