Hamas admits 600-700 of its men were killed in Cast Lead


By Anonymous
November 12, 2010
Share

http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/hamas-admits-600-700-of-it...

It seems that the PCHR evaluation of more than 50% women and children killed must be reevaluated. Or that women and children were Hamas militants.
Please note that this figure was consistent with Israel's evaluation. Add to this all the 'civilians' who were killed while holding weapons and those who are not Hamas militants, those who were killed by Hamas friendly fire, those who were killed while Hamas militants were hiding behind them and added as "victims of Israel"...
The real civilian body count must be close to 200. Too much, certainly, but no army in the world could have done better considering the environment. NATO does worse in Afghanistan, a place where population density is much lower than in Gaza.

This proves all the propaganda the anti-'zionist' crowd has swallowed was just that: propaganda.

COMMENTS

Jon_i_Cohen

13 November, 2010 - 01:13

Rate this:

0 points

Exactly!
Hiding Around Mosques And Schools = HAMAS

jose (not verified)

13 November, 2010 - 03:30

Rate this:

0 points

And I remind the lurking anti-'zionist' crowd that the PCHR figures is one of the main sources of 'information' for the Goldstone report.
It should be reported to Goldstone that it is just another propaganda machine set up by 'Palestinians' to suit their terrorist leaders' agenda.

Hence, the Hamas, by this admission, recognizes that the Goldstone report is partly based on biased data. Of course, the part saying that the eight years of Hamas rockets on Israel amounted to war crimes and crimes against umanity is perfectly correct.

amber

13 November, 2010 - 09:59

Rate this:

0 points

Well, you won't get any comments for zair, yankeeuxb or watchful iris, or tsam.

It's always like this - the truth comes out months later - and doesn't get reported.

Kahina

13 November, 2010 - 11:21

Rate this:

0 points

Thanks Jose for posting this story.

This is another Jenin fiasco. Why hasn't it been reported in the msn?

And the JC?

jose (not verified)

13 November, 2010 - 19:57

Rate this:

0 points

"This is another Jenin fiasco. Why hasn't it been reported in the msn?
And the JC?"

It is reported in Haaretz, Ynet and JPost and the usual press agencies. Maybe the JC is not interested in the subject, who knows?

What counts is what is published at the second it (supposedly) happens. The truth that comes later is not as tasty, especially when it does not accuse Israel of wrongdoing.

POST A COMMENT

You must be logged in to post a comment.

MORE FROM THIS AUTHOR

LATEST COMMENTS