Ging goes


By Anonymous
January 18, 2011
Share

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-12205627

Well, someone who will not be missed.
Now we understand why he wanted to appear at Jewish events such as Limud, to avoid being considered by the Jewish community as the vile liar he is and get support from USA, UK and other UNSC members.
Too bad the Limud organisers played his game.

COMMENTS

Jonathan Hoffman

18 January, 2011 - 08:29

Rate this:

4 points

Good riddance

What's the betting in New York he will be put in charge of organising Durban 3?


jose (not verified)

18 January, 2011 - 08:55

Rate this:

3 points

He quits to go to UN OCHA (Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs)...

Poor humanitarians affairs!


mattpryor

18 January, 2011 - 10:32

Rate this:

2 points

What about Christopher "They bombed a hospital*" Gunness, is he staying?

*Oh no they didn't.


jose (not verified)

18 January, 2011 - 11:07

Rate this:

2 points

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Fakhura_school_incident :

The UN originally said that the shelling took place outside the school. John Ging, Director of UNRWA operations in Gaza was quoted by The Guardian as saying that three shells had landed "at the perimeter of the school".[42] Another branch of the UN, its humanitarian affairs agency (OCHA) also reported in its daily output of 6 January that the missile strikes had been outside the school.[43] In its report of the following day, however, it said the school itself had been shelled.[44] Three weeks later, this error was corrected by Maxwell Gaylord, the UN humanitarian coordinator, who stated that the UN "would like to clarify that the shelling, and all of the fatalities, took place outside rather than inside the school.[45] As a result, several news agencies claimed that the UN had backtracked from its original claim that the strike had hit the school[46] Abraham Rabinovich of The Australian also criticized John Ging and other UN officials claiming they did not "dispel widespread suspicions" and that one of Ging's statement implied the school was hit directly.[47] Christopher Gunness, an UNRWA spokesman, called Rabinovich's article "grossly misleading" and " inaccurate".

Two Pinocchios, denying their blattant lies...
Note that the OCHA was also involved in this 'Palestinian' propaganda operation. Ging will be happy there! He will find all his biased buddies.


mattpryor

18 January, 2011 - 11:34

Rate this:

2 points

I saw Gunness interviewed by the BBC and he explicitly said that the IAF had deliberately bombed the school. It was an outright lie or an assumption based on incorrect information (provided by Hamas?), either of which should have cost him his job.

But of course everything the UN says is true!

Just one of a number of events that didn't add up, like the alleged bombing of the zoo (which the IDF documented as being booby trapped by Hamas) and three hospitals which were miraculously rebuilt after Israel withdrew.


jose (not verified)

18 January, 2011 - 11:50

Rate this:

2 points

The first casualty of war is Truth. It is a shame for the international community that the UN is involved in its murder.
Maybe an international tribunal to try Gunness and Ging for murder of the Truth?

POST A COMMENT

You must be logged in to post a comment.