Election outrage at South Hampstead shul


By Shtekhler
May 6, 2010
Share

Don't you get fed up with antisemites going on about the "Jewish vote"? Why should it be assumed that just because we are Jews that we all share the same political views or regard the same political matters as important? Many Jews I know vote out of fundamental values and convictions but they are as different from each other as could be imagined. Some Jews believe that what politicians say about the Middle East is important, some of them will be looking for very pro-Israel statements, others will be looking for politicians who will support peace for Palestinians and Israelis and get very put off by candidates who try to shmooze their Jewish constituents by being ultra-Zionist. Many Jews I know don't give a monkeys what politicians are saying about a conflict thousands of miles away but will look at what they say about the BNP here, about cuts to public spending, about health care and education - and so on.

But what would you think if your synagogue - that,I shouldn't need to remind you, people do not join for political reasons, phones you a few days before the election, to tell you NOT to a vote for your local Labour candidate?

That is what has happened to the members of South Hampstead United synagogue. I know that because someone close to me was officially called up by this synagogue with this precise instruction.

Regardless of the illegality of contravening the Data Protection Act - what an outrage, what an absolute chutzpah, and what a gift to the antisemites who go on about "Jewish lobbies" and "Jewish votes"!

COMMENTS

Akiva

6 May, 2010 - 09:36

Rate this:

0 points

They're right though. Don't vote Labour.


Tamar10

6 May, 2010 - 10:43

Rate this:

0 points

It is truly outrageous. I would certainly cancel my membership if my synagogue called me to tell me who to vote for. And I have rejected candidates precisely because they shmooze Jewish voters with ultra-Zionist statements, assume that all Jews think as one about Israel and assume that there is such a thing as the "Jewish vote".


Lanne

6 May, 2010 - 13:14

Rate this:

0 points

The synagogue is not a political group, it has purely religious purposes and it is not their place to tell people who to vote for.


Jonathan Hoffman

6 May, 2010 - 23:31

Rate this:

0 points

Your vote is secret. Shul members can advise other members. Nothing wrong with that. Chris Philp (Con). was the best candidate in that constituency.


Stanley Walinets

7 May, 2010 - 10:56

Rate this:

0 points

I'm trying to imagine Mr Hoffman's response if the Shul had advised its members to vote for a Labour candidate. "Nothing wrong with that", I imagine he'd say. I do have a strong imagination though...


Jonathan Hoffman

7 May, 2010 - 12:54

Rate this:

0 points

Note that the JC story on this is very different from the above: "Synagogue members have been contacted by canvassers who claimed a Conservative Party candidate was endorsed by the congregation."

The post above claims it was "the synagogue" who made the contact

Thinks ..... Since when do synagogues make phone calls ...


Shtekhler

8 May, 2010 - 11:53

Rate this:

0 points

Jonathan Hoffman has got this completely wrong.

The person who phoned the synagogue member I know said explicitly they were phoning from the shul. They didn't mention the Conservative Party. When this synagogue member phoned the shul later to complain about this incident, the secretary at the shul was obviously rattled and embarrassed (and had clearly had similar complaints). She promised to call back with an explanation. Needless to say she hasn't - what could she say?

The member in question believes that they were seeking time to put together a version of events that exonerated the shul from its contravention of the Data Protection Act. This damage limitation version seems to be the one that the JC has swallowed this week.

Despite this abuse of access to members' contact details, the voters in the catchment area of the shul had enough intelligence and independence to elect Labour MPs Glenda Jackson and Frank Dobson. Mazeltov to them.

BTW - where does this tactic fit in with the shul's commitment to the Ethics of the Fathers?

POST A COMMENT

You must be logged in to post a comment.