Egypt - it ain't going to turn out well!


By Alan Melkman
February 1, 2011
Share

Has there ever been a more ignorant, arrogant and amateur US administration led by a brilliant law professor who even makes Jimmy Carter look like an insightful intellectual? Its response to events in Egypt will hopefully mark the low water mark in its foreign policy failures, although I fear it will attempt to plumb even more profound depths in the future.

If you haven’t yet got the message here’s what President Obama is sending to all of the West’s less savoury allies. We love you and treasure you; we’ll give you aid and turn a blind eye to your human rights abuses and corruption; we’ll allow you to accumulate vast wealth at the expense of your fellow citizens financed by our largesse. Of course, we’ll mouth some platitudes but you don’t need to take any notice of them. But, and there’s always ‘a but’, as soon as you really need our help and support, then we’ll drop you like a plague ridden rat.

So if you’re a leader of some poorish country who has hitched his wagon to the US you face a dilemma. The propaganda machine you control has been telling your citizens for years that their poverty and backwardness is not their fault and certainly not yours. No, it’s the fault of the colonialists, the US, the West in general and, for good measure, the Jews/Zionist/Israelis. Do you stick to your position and risk the same thing happening to you as is going to happen to Mubarak in Egypt.

The reality - Obama has left the Egyptian leader out to dry. Hilary Clinton has faithfully echoed the words of her boss. Who knows if she goes along with them? John Kerry has twisted the knife.

So if you’re the leader of a US ally you now know beyond a shadow of doubt that the Americans will not save you when you really need them. You also know that Obama has bent over backwards to appease those states who oppose the US and hate the West. You’ll look at leaders like Bashar al-Assad, the Syrian dictator, who allies himself with Iran, lectures visiting western leaders including Tony Blair, makes the right noises in English to reassure the US but consistently undermines them in Arabic, and as a result gets rewarded by Obama who re-establishes diplomatic relations. This is useful to Assad in the short term since it gives his regime some sort of legitimacy and increases the amount of foreign aid which may be used to advantage. For him, it’s a no lose situation. However, he now knows, even if he didn’t before, that the US is not a reliable long term ally. In contrast Iran is! No wonder Assad is smiling, he knows who his true friends are.

There seems little doubt that as events in Egypt unfold they will make the Middle East, and in turn the world, even more of a powder keg. In 1979 the Iranian popular revolution ended with the Mullahs rise to power and the Nazi Ahmadinejad strutting the UN stage. The Beirut Cedar revolution in 2005 for freedom resulted in Hezbollah seizing power, and the liberation of Gaza in the same year produced a Hamas government.

There will always be some who will make the case that this time it’s different and that Egypt will become an enlightened, democratic, free, open and fair society. I hope they are right, although history is against them.

There are a minimum of two years left of the Obama presidency. Enough time to do much damage. The nightmare is that he is re-elected and then, unbridled by the need to be elected again, he really unleashes his vision on the world. It is hard to imagine a more destabilising scenario, especially linked to a nuclear Iran.

COMMENTS

mattpryor

1 February, 2011 - 18:23

Rate this:

-1 points

I agree Alan, good essay.


jose (not verified)

3 February, 2011 - 17:49

Rate this:

1 point

http://www.jewishworldreview.com/0211/glick020111.php3

According to a Pew opinion survey of Egyptians from June 2010, 59 percent said they back Islamists. Only 27% said they back modernizers. Half of Egyptians support Hamas. Thirty percent support Hizbullah and 20% support al Qaida. Moreover, 95% of them would welcome Islamic influence over their politics. When this preference is translated into actual government policy, it is clear that the Islam they support is the al Qaida Salafist version.

Eighty two percent of Egyptians support executing adulterers by stoning, 77% support whipping and cutting the hands off thieves. 84% support executing any Muslim who changes his religion.

Good night and good luck!


Alan Melkman

3 February, 2011 - 19:42

Rate this:

-1 points

Thanks, hope it helps.


Alan Melkman

3 February, 2011 - 20:28

Rate this:

0 points

The Pew poll is very relevant, indicative of what is likely to happen. It's also depressing.

The important question is what should Western governments do when a Muslim Brotherhood backed/tolerated administration comes to power in Egypt. The media advise and the diplomats propose that the West should recognise the reality and reach an accommodation with the Islamists. Already the Brotherhood is being reinvented by the media as not so bad, having renounced violence and wanting to work within the existing political system.

Again this is a no lose approach for the Brotherhood. By giving the West straws to grasp they will enhance the probability that the Egyptian army, heavily dependent on the US, will not move against them. Their own hard core supporters don't believe a word of it and recognise the ploy. Of course, once in power, it will all be forgotten.

What to do? The U.S., the UK and the rest of Europe and any others who can be corralled, should state that they fully recognise any truly democratically elected government which can include the Muslim Brotherhood provided it disclaims all elements of its founding charter. This includes the group's belief, that the Quran and Sunnah constitute a perfect way of life and social and political organization that God has set out for man. Islamic governments must be based on this system and eventually unified in a Caliphate. The Muslim Brotherhood's goal, as stated by Brotherhood founder Hassan al-Banna is to reclaim Islam’s manifest destiny, an empire, stretching from Spain to Indonesia and that Israel should be wiped off the face of the map.

If the Brotherhood does not fully disavow itself from these obnoxious aims then the West should make it clear that all aid will be cut off, including military aid, and it will be regarded as a terrorist state. As such it will receive no recognition and its leaders and their wives/mistresses will not be able to enjoy the pleasures offered by New York, Paris, London or Amsterdam or anywhere else where the UN holds it jamborees.

Are Hague, Clinton and Baroness Ashton going to take this approach. Don't hold your breath. Result, a further decisive victory for the Islamists.


Yoni1

3 February, 2011 - 20:57

Rate this:

0 points

Well said!


jose (not verified)

3 February, 2011 - 21:01

Rate this:

-1 points

If you can't beat them, join them! They will get something of a surprise when they understand that the only way to join islamism is to convert or to be second-class citizens.

Egypt is not such a big problem because their economy depend on two industries only. One is already bad (tourism) and a war could destroy the second (the Suez Canal).
Then, what would remain, to the would-be dictators of Egypt, to calm down the Egyptian people? The Egyptian Army?


Jon_i_Cohen

3 February, 2011 - 21:22

Rate this:

0 points

Very good article.
The way things are looking do not bode well for Israel. If The Moslem Brotherhood end up in control in Egypt the ramifications could rebound; Moslems in control of a well armed military with the latest in American hardware.
This is Obamas legacy - scary.

POST A COMMENT

You must be logged in to post a comment.