Any excuse


By Jenni Frazer
August 24, 2009
Share

Using the not unreasonable hook of press freedom, Roy Greenslade in today's Media Guardian presented a factual account of the Israeli government's building annoyance with the Swedish authorities over the Aftonbladet row.
For new readers, this was the Swedish newspaper's decision to run a story claiming that Israeli soldiers were routinely harvesting body parts from captured Palestinians.
As the Israeli fury with the Swedish government has escalated, so has the annoyance risen of the Swedish Jewish community with the Israeli government. Swedish Jews have complained that the Israeli government, for reasons best known to itself, has manufactured a row where none needed to exist, and made their lives twice as difficult, unnecessarily.
I had a certain sympathy with this Swedish Jewish point of view until I read the comments following Roy Greenslade's article. For sheer, vicious loathing of Israel, you'd find these hard to beat, bearing in mind that a good third of the comments have already been removed by the Guardian moderators for a variety of breaches of the Guardian web guidelines.
Even Alan Rusbridger ought by now to have come to an understanding that any mention of Israel on the web pages of his newspaper brings the antisemites out of the woodwork, no matter how spurious the excuse.

COMMENTS

Jonathan Hoffman

26 August, 2009 - 16:28

Rate this:

0 points

Precisely Jenni

There is a great new blog called 'CIF Watch' to monitor antisemitism on Guardian CIF

www.cifwatch.com


margaret rutherford

26 August, 2009 - 18:14

Rate this:

0 points

Oi Jonathan. All these "watch" webblogs - NGOwatch, cifwatch, hrwwatch etc -- are so 1984. Then agian, maybe there ought to be a ZFpropagandistwatch, too


Joshua18

28 August, 2009 - 12:04

Rate this:

0 points

"All these "watch" webblogs - NGOwatch, cifwatch, hrwwatch etc -- are so 1984."

And extremely necessary whilst the Guardian is so 1933-1945.


Joe Millis esq

28 August, 2009 - 14:09

Rate this:

0 points

But Joshua, as Juvenal wrote: Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?


Joshua18

28 August, 2009 - 15:24

Rate this:

0 points

As a leading member of the fourth estate, the Guardian should, at least in theory, have a leading role in fighting for truth and guarding the liberties of the citizens of Britain. Unfortunately, as regards the Jewish citizens of this nation and telling the truth about Israel that newspaper has not only largely abrogated its responsibilities but is also actually stirring up hatred. Thus, fully cognisant of what is at some point likely to occur when incitement against the Jewish people is ignored, certain individuals (e.g. Melanie Phillips, Stephen Pollard, Robin Shepherd) and various organisations have decided to fight back. I see no problem with that. They are not guards in the sense of your quotation (in actual fact, the sense in which it is today taken is a long way from Juvenal's real meaning); they have no real power to punish or to prevent or to frighten. They are merely exercising their rights in a democracy (or at least what passes for democracy today in Britain). If the Guardian objects, the Guardian can always defend itself. It's surely big enough, and rich enough and ugly enough to take care of itself.

POST A COMMENT

You must be logged in to post a comment.

LATEST COMMENTS