Another South American Country Recognises the State of Palestine


By Yvetta
December 25, 2010
Share

Read all about it in the Jewish Chronicle - er, not.
They didn't report instances 1, 2, and 3, so why I guess it's not NIFty to report no. 4
Never mind Israel's troubles.
What's Israel to us, huh?
You can read about that tasty Denzil Washington in the JC, though.
Enjoy.

COMMENTS

Yehuda Erdman

Sat, 12/25/2010 - 23:24

Rate this:

0 points

The more nations that recognise Palestine, the better in my opinion.


Kahina

Sun, 12/26/2010 - 00:03

Rate this:

0 points

Welcome back Yehuda! (Good to see you removed your serial Chief Rabbis).

But where the hell is Palestine? There are no new agreements with borders, so which nations are recognising what? Seen zero about this in the JC.

Please enlighten me!


Kahina

Sun, 12/26/2010 - 00:04

Rate this:

0 points

Just found this.... very interesting blog about the lack of JC reporting:

http://daphneanson.blogspot.com/2010/12/his-masters-voice-from-nifs-mout...

Could it be true?


jose (not verified)

Sun, 12/26/2010 - 04:32

Rate this:

0 points

The more nations that recognise Palestine, the better in my opinion.

Of course, this way, the extremists only will have their say, which is what you really want.
So the settlers will grab what they can, while they can. Similarly the HAMAS and Fatah will be 'legitimately' driven to kill Israelis even in the Old City, for example drop stones from Temple Mount onto those who pray at the wall, etc.

Hatemongers show their colours.


jose (not verified)

Sun, 12/26/2010 - 04:52

Rate this:

0 points

The fact is not that anyone recognises 'Palestine' or not, since Israel is ready to do it anytime, when the negociations will have set the borders.
The problem with these stupid antisemitic South American countries is that they defined the borders as being the indefensible 1949 armistice line. They thus tell the 'Palestinians' that the negotiations are useless. What is there to negotiate about since everything you can claim is given to you. Unless you want even more...
The 'Palestinians' already have more than 80% of the old British Mandate Palestine. How much would be enough? 100%?


jose (not verified)

Sun, 12/26/2010 - 04:59

Rate this:

0 points

Let's remind also that the 'Palestinians' ethnically cleansed East Jerusalem when it was invaded in 1949.
Jerusalem, including East part, had a Jewish majority since the 1850s at least.
By recognising a 'Palestine' within the 1949 armistice line, Brazil, Argentina, Bolivia, Uruguay and Ecuador validate the ethnic cleansing of Jews.

How should we call such countries?


jose (not verified)

Sun, 12/26/2010 - 05:01

Rate this:

0 points

Uruguay has not yet formally cognised 'Palestine' but promised it will do so early 2011...


jose (not verified)

Sun, 12/26/2010 - 05:13

Rate this:

0 points

And here is the final answer to whether 'Palestine' will or will not be a racist state:
http://www.jpost.com/MiddleEast/Article.aspx?id=200935

Of course, he does not mean "Israelis" but "Jews", since he is not ready to admit any of the settlers as citizens in his 'Palestine'.

So we have a stated ethnic cleansing likely to happen whenever the 'Palestine' state will be officially declared.

Abbas wants a race war. No wonder he stopped all negotiations.


Yoni1

Sun, 12/26/2010 - 15:23

Rate this:

0 points

To answer your question, Jose: Nazi ones.

Nazis, I hear you ask? In South America? Not possible, surely! After all, none of them are Catholic, none of them gave refuge to Nazis after WW2. They are Jew-lovers one and all.

The serious question, though, is why paranoid schizophrenics rule these countries, as must be the case if they recognise a 'country' that doesn't exist now and has never existed before. There must be a shortage of psychiatrists in South America.

POST A COMMENT

You must be logged in to post a comment.

LATEST COMMENTS