America kills hundreds of civilians - where's Judge Goldstone?


By Miriam Shaviv
November 3, 2009
Share

An assessment of President Obama's first year in office by Lexington, the Economist's American-affairs column, includes the following revelation:

In his inauguration speech, he declared: “We reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals.” Yet roughly once a week since that day, he has ordered the assassination of suspected terrorists. These assassinations, carried out with Hellfire missiles fired from hovering drones, are often messy. According to the New America Foundation, a think-tank, it took 15 attempts to kill Baitullah Mehsud, a Taliban leader in Pakistan who was finally blown to scraps in August. Hundreds of people, some of them children have died in these drone attacks. Mr Obama would presumably include “not killing children” among his ideals. Sometimes, however, he sets aside this ideal in the interests of safety.

But who, other than Lexington, has noticed? Or cares?

Let's imagine, for a moment, that Israel was ordering the targeted assassination - for that's what we're talking about - of its terrorist enemies, once a week (!), killing "hundreds of people, some of them children", in the process. Can you imagine the uproar? The media coverage? The 'experts' opining about Israel's lack of morals?

It has happened many times.

Now, don't get me wrong here. While every civilian death is a tragedy, and should be avoided where possible, I am not inherently against targeted assassinations, which are sometimes the only way to deal with very dangerous men. Civilians are sometimes killed in the process - war is "messy". (In the Israeli case, in particular, most of the men targeted have been directly responsible for attacks on Israeli civilians, by the way, which is not necessarily the case for the American targets in Pakistan and Afghanistan. And Israel has often given up good opportunities to assassinate terrorist leaders because of the potential civilian toll).

I hold many things against Mr Obama, this isn't one of them.

But it is funny how the world is able to understand or ignore the fact that sometimes American safety must result in civilian casualties. When Israel makes the same calculation, it is turned into a monster.

COMMENTS

caramX9

3 November, 2009 - 10:27

Rate this:

0 points

*applause*


iainlrabbak

3 November, 2009 - 10:44

Rate this:

0 points

Israel and its propagandists should consider the following: it's not a superpower-it's not America; it's not Russia; it's not China. It isn't even India. At best it is in the same league as Serbia, Croatia, Congo or Pakistan.


jose (not verified)

3 November, 2009 - 18:53

Rate this:

0 points

Does that mean there are things that are morally wrong for Israel and morally right for America, Russia or China? Or 'even' India?

By the way, Israel is listed as 42nd in the list of IMF for 2008. Serbia 69th (4 times smaller), about the same for Croatia. Pakistan is a bit similar (48th and has nuclear weapons), while Congo is 118th (25 times smaller).


Joe

5 November, 2009 - 11:17

Rate this:

0 points

A study of civilian deaths in Iraq several years back calculated the figure as approx. 600,000 !!! Explaining this is a lot more difficult than justifying targeted assassinations of terrorists.

POST A COMMENT

You must be logged in to post a comment.