A Disproportionate Response


By Jon_i_Cohen
January 18, 2010
Share

E-mailed to me earlier and worthy of a wider readership.

Many countries and world leaders have accused Israel of responding disproportionately to aggression from Hizballah in Lebanon and Hamas in Gaza.

However, it is time that the world press and media speak of another disproportionate response from Israel.

The terrible disastrous earthquake in Haiti has generated responses from many nations. The US has sent supplies and personnel, Britain sent 64 firemen and 8 volunteers, France sent troops for Search and Rescue. Many large and wealthy nations of the world sent money. The Arab and Moslem world nothing.

Israel, a nation of 7.5 million people has sent a team of 220 people that include Medical personnel and will establish the largest field hospital in Haiti, treating up to 5,000 people a day, an experienced Search and Rescue team and medical supplies. As in previous earthquake disasters, such as in Gujarat India in 2001 and in Turkey, in the bombings in Kenya, Israel has been one of the most generous givers of aid and assistance.

Turkey seems to have forgotten this help as its extreme Moslem Government is cozying up to Iran.

The favourite occupation in the UN is Israel bashing. More resolutions have been passed condemning Israel than all the so called democratic nations such as Sudan, China, Russia and others for their crimes against their minorities.

I think it is time that the world should know about Israel's disproportionate response.

I call it positive. Incredibly so. Not happy -- in fact, unspeakably painful. But a Kiddush HaShem: a blessing on G-d's name.

In the midst of the overwhelming death and destruction that is Haiti right now, there are Israelis who have come to save lives and offer succor.

On Friday, El Al and IDF planes came into Haiti, carrying 250 medical personnel -- doctors, nurses, lab and x-ray technicians and even a psychiatrist -- and supplies for a mobile hospital, including a pharmacy, a surgical unit, and a maternity ward. A young Haitian mother who was the first to deliver in this ward, early this morning, named her baby Israel.

You can see footage of an IDF rescue team at work in Haiti here:

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost/Page/VideoPlayer&c...

Members of ZAKA, the Israeli ultra-Orthodox volunteer rescue organization, were on the scene as well. Yesterday, on Shabbat, they labored, digging in the rubble of a collapsed multi-story university building, where cries were heard. After hours of effort, they succeeded in pulling eight students from that rubble, alive.

These ZAKA members then took time, in the midst of the chaos, to wrap themselves in their tallitot (prayer shawls) and recite their Shabbat prayers. Undoubtedly most if not all of the Haitians on the scene had never seen such a sight.

When the men had finished praying, a crowd of people gathered around them and kissed their tallitot.

According to one report, head of the ZAKA mission, Mati Goldstein said:

"With all the hell going on outside, even when things get bad Judaism says we must take a deep breath and go on to save more people.

"We did everything to save lives, despite Shabbat. People asked, 'Why are you here? There are no Jews here', but we are here because the Torah orders us to save lives."

At one point, when things were very grim, Goldstein reported that one mission member started to sing, Heveinu Shalom Aleichem (We bring peace to you.) "I had tears in my eyes," he said.

The ZAKA mission will be staying in Haiti a couple more days, even though beyond a certain point it is highly unlikely that anyone else will be found alive under the rubble.

What is exceedingly important to the mission is making their Israeli identity very clear. And so, in this regard, you can help Israel by sharing this broadly and letting the world know what we are all about.

Please forward this to as many people as you can, and please, no left-wing, Guardianesque, Trolling comments on this posting.

COMMENTS

gordon bennett

18 January, 2010 - 21:17

Rate this:

0 points

What was it Akiva Eldar -- an Israeli in Israel, not a megaphone in Hendon -- wrote in Haaretz:

The disaster in Haiti is a natural one; the one in Gaza is the unproud handiwork of man. Our handiwork. The IDF does not send cargo planes stuffed with medicines and medical equipment to Gaza. The missiles that Israel Air Force combat aircraft fired there a year ago hit nearly 60,000 homes and factories, turning 3,500 of them into rubble. Since then, 10,000 people have been living without running water, 40,000 without electricity. Ninety-seven percent of Gaza's factories are idle due to Israeli government restrictions on the import of raw materials for industry. Soon it will be one year since the international community pledged, at the emergency conference in Sharm el-Sheikh, to donate $4.5 billion for Gaza's reconstruction. Israel's ban on bringing in building materials is causing that money to lose its value.

A few days before Israeli physicians rushed to save the lives of injured Haitians, the authorities at the Erez checkpoint prevented 17 people from passing through in order to get to a Ramallah hospital for urgent corneal transplant surgery.


Yvetta

18 January, 2010 - 21:21

Rate this:

0 points

Thanks for this info, Jon, which I've c&p'd (in part) onto another site, to make the Israel-haters there think again.


gordon bennett

18 January, 2010 - 21:23

Rate this:

0 points

Yvetta, you will, of course, be letting them know about Eldar's analysis in Haaretz.


Yvetta

18 January, 2010 - 21:31

Rate this:

0 points

They'll sniff dung out for themselves, Gordon. They always do.


gordon bennett

18 January, 2010 - 21:33

Rate this:

0 points

Humanitarian Israel: A few days before Israeli physicians rushed to save the lives of injured Haitians, the authorities at the Erez checkpoint prevented 17 people from passing through in order to get to a Ramallah hospital for urgent corneal transplant surgery.


Jon_i_Cohen

18 January, 2010 - 23:31

Rate this:

0 points

So I see Gordon Bennet/Bennet the Troll ignored the last sentence in the posting.
The posting was about the Humanitarian efforts Israel has gone to help the people of Haiti suffering from a humanitarian disaster as terrible as the Tsunami; what does the Troll do? tries to make a left-wing, Guardianesque, Trolling, stupid comment about Gaza.
Why should Israel help Gaza?? Where is the logic?? Gaza is controlled by Hamas, an internationally proscribed terrorist organisation avowed to the destruction of Israel; with its people wallowing in a disaster of their own making. Gordon Bennett or Bennet, or whoever you are, it is Christianity that preaches "turn the other cheek" and "love your enemy", not Judaism.


DLeigh-Ellis

19 January, 2010 - 17:26

Rate this:

0 points

This is a 'left wing guardianesque troll' comment

You can't just request that those who disagree with you kindly stay away... Otherwise this website would descend into some kind of gd awful Jon I Cohen Love fest....

sorry Jon, but i gotta keep you on your dainty little toes


Jonathan Hoffman

19 January, 2010 - 17:33

Rate this:

0 points

"the authorities at the Erez checkpoint prevented 17 people from passing through in order to get to a Ramallah hospital for urgent corneal transplant surgery."

Please substantiate this


moshetzarfati2

19 January, 2010 - 18:18

Rate this:

0 points

Jonathan, have you tried reading Israeli reports, in Hebrew? It's all there. This is not an ad hom, it's advice (I'll assume you do read Hebrew enough to understand it).


Jon_i_Cohen

20 January, 2010 - 13:13

Rate this:

0 points

@DLeigh-Ellis
Funny guy!
I was providing information about the wonderful work Israel is doing in Haiti, so, there should be no need for any left-wing, anti comments, should there?

Take a look at this:-

http://edition.cnn.com/video/data/2.0/video/world/2010/01/18/dnt.cohen.h...

@moshetzarfaiti2
Corneal surgery for terrorists and suicide bombers, another funny guy!


Jonathan Hoffman

20 January, 2010 - 13:20

Rate this:

0 points

I asked 'please substantiate this'

I didn't specify a language


moshetzarfati2

20 January, 2010 - 14:45

Rate this:

0 points

No one asks you, Jonathan, to substantiate claims made by others in their reports or papers -- such as those sponsored by Israel's Defence or Foreign Ministries and other state organs -- so why should I or anyone else try and substantiate a claim made by a respected Israeli journalist, writing in Israel about events on the Israeli-Gaza border? Or is this just a straw man tactic?


Jonathan Hoffman

20 January, 2010 - 16:46

Rate this:

0 points

Because Ha'aretz has a track record of publishing Israel-bashing stories that turn out to be false.

http://www.camera.org/index.asp?x_context=4&x_outlet=12&x_article=1697

Unless you can substantiate it, the presumption is that it is false. In December, 1724 Gaza residents entered Israel for medical and humanitarian reasons. I do not believe therefore that "the authorities at the Erez checkpoint prevented 17 people from passing through in order to get to a Ramallah hospital for urgent corneal transplant surgery."


moshetzarfati2

20 January, 2010 - 18:28

Rate this:

0 points

Two can play that game, Jonathan. Unless you substantiate the state-sponsored propaganda that you bring, the presumption is that it must be false. Is that what you want? Since no one has disputed Eldar's figures, not even those who are paid to dispute them here and in Israel, the presumption is that they must be correct.


Jonathan Hoffman

20 January, 2010 - 19:12

Rate this:

0 points

http://thecst.org.uk/blog/?p=1089

WHATEVER OUR DIFFERENCES I HOPE WE CAN ALL AGREE THAT PRESS TV ARE DESPICABLE FOR RUNNING THIS STORY AND SHOULD LOSE THEIR LICENCE IN THE UK.

RUPERT MURDOCH, ARE YOU READING THIS?


Jonathan Hoffman

20 January, 2010 - 19:40

Rate this:

0 points

No-one has disputed them because the lies come so thick and fast.

I dispute them.


gordon bennett

20 January, 2010 - 21:00

Rate this:

0 points

Press TV are just a propaganda outlet. So they broadcast crap. No one should bother with them and no one should lower themselves so much as to appear on them, ain't that right Mr Hoffman?


gordon bennett

20 January, 2010 - 21:02

Rate this:

0 points

No one gas disputed them because they happen to be true. As Moshe points out, even those paid to dispute them haven't disputed them. So you, Jonathan, dispute them. Some questions: the basis for your disputation is what? And who precisely are you to dispute? Were you there?


moshetzarfati2

20 January, 2010 - 22:12

Rate this:

0 points

I'm with Gordon on this. Why are you trying to divert to this issue? Press TV are a state propaganda outfit. The fact that News Corp give them a platform just shows that it is only in it for the money. Murdoch's a businessman. What do you expect? He also plays with the Chinese, too, because they got megabucks and there's an awful lot of them.


moshetzarfati2

20 January, 2010 - 22:21

Rate this:

0 points

Camera, Jonathan? Another Orwellian watch site. And I really do love it that Camera, a bunch of propagandists sitting in the US is telling Israeli soldiers who were in Gaza what they did or didn't witness.
You are free to dispute what you like, of course, but as Gordon asked: what's your basis for the dispute? If it's because Haaretz has, according to you, published "Israel-bashing" reports then that's hardly a game changer. This newspaper, the JC, has had what you might describe as "Israel-bashing" reports or comment pieces. So have the Times, the Telegraph and even the Wall Street Journal. Christ, even the Jerusalem Post allows some comment critical of Israel government policies. Does that make them suspect or anti-Israel? Haaretz also has regular columns by Yisrael Harel, Moshe Arens and Ari Shavit, none of whom could possibly be described as "anti-Israel" or "Israel-bashers". Israel has a robust press, possibly even more robust than here. Isn't that something to celebrate?


Jonathan Hoffman

21 January, 2010 - 00:31

Rate this:

0 points

How McCarthyite

1. Ha'aretz with its history of Israel-bashing says it

2. You assume it is true until proved false

Despite the fact that no-one has corroborated it

"Israel is guilty until proved innocent" - that's how it goes in your parallel universe isn't it ...

We can safely dismiss it then, you trolls are perfect contra-indicators.


moshetzarfati2

21 January, 2010 - 09:22

Rate this:

0 points

I'm not sure you have a grasp of the concept of McCarthyism, which is the politically motivated practice of making accusations of disloyalty, subversion, or treason without proper regard for evidence. Unless, of course, it has something to do with Mick McCarthy that I am as yet unaware of ;-).

1. Ha'aretz with its history of Israel-bashing says it

Haaretz is, as far as I am aware, an Israeli newspaper which has columnists from across the Israeli political spectrum and a whole host of journalists who span that divide, too. As such, it is pretty much like all other Israeli newspapers. Even the freebie Yisrael Hayom, which has been dubbed the Bibiton for its pro-Netanyahu stance, employs Yossi Beilin and Dan Margalit as columnists, neither of whom could be considered friends of the Israeli far right. And as I said, even the Jerusalem Post and the JC have had what you would consider "Israel bashing" pieces. So? That's the very good price we in a democracy have to pay for a robust and free press. I hope you are not suggesting that the price is too high or even wrong.

2. You assume it is true until proved false

And you don't? How else would you base any knowledge?

Despite the fact that no-one has corroborated it

Has anyone with any credence or credibility dismissed it? Even those paid to do so? Even Camera?

I maybe in a parallel universe, but it is the real one, parallel to your own surreal one.
Eye for an eye, ad hom for an ad hom.


DLeigh-Ellis

21 January, 2010 - 18:28

Rate this:

0 points

(comment removed)


Jonathan Hoffman

21 January, 2010 - 18:40

Rate this:

0 points

"And you don't? How else would you base any knowledge?"

- Of course not. When it's in a newspaper with a track record of unrtruthful criticism of Israel, then of course I don't assume it is true until proved false. I assume it's false until proved true.

You on the other hand ....


moshetzarfati2

21 January, 2010 - 19:37

Rate this:

0 points

Jonathan, just because some far right "watch" organisations think Haaretz is "Israel bashing" doesn't make it so. And let's not forget: Haaretz is in Israel, while many of the "watch" organisations are not. Just because its criticism of Israel's policies -- an important component in a democratic society, I hope you'll agree -- doesn't jive with the extreme right wing in Zionism doesn't make it illegitimate.
If you did a count of how many articles which you would describe as "Israel-bashing" in Haaretz and compared the result with Yediot, Maariv, Yisrael Hayom and even the Jerusalem Post and the JC, you'd find that it's about the same. Haaretz is an Israeli newspaper, based in Israel, which has columnists and writers from across the political spectrum there. From Moshe Arens and Yisrael Harel on the far right to Amira Hass and Gideon Levy on the far left and various shades in between.
Maariv, by comparison, has Moshe Feiglin on the far right to Nadav Eyal on the far left.
Yediot has writers spanning from Shaul Rozenfeld to Shulamit Aloni.
You want me to go on?


Jonathan Hoffman

21 January, 2010 - 19:57

Rate this:

0 points

It's not a question of left v right

It is the number of articles Ha'aretz publishes which turn out to be false


moshetzarfati2

21 January, 2010 - 20:52

Rate this:

0 points

No one has said the Haaretz report was false, not even the organisations such as Camera which are quick to point out falsehoods, even if these are only falsehoods of their mind.
All newspapers have articles which turn out to be false, due to misinformation, change of plans or just plain wishful thinking... Last week, the JC splashed on a report that war crimes legislation would be changed this week. It wasn't. Does that make the JC suspect? Of course it doesn't.


Ruth Clark

23 January, 2010 - 22:43

Rate this:

0 points

Seventeen people were denied urgent corneal transplant surgery, says gordon bennet. Jon-i-Cohen says ‘Corneal surgery for terrorists and suicide bombers.’ His response is shallow, ill-informed, illogical and lacking in the milk of human kindness.

According to a 2009 count, the population of Gaza was just over one and half million, 44.4% of them being children 14 or under. And Jon-i-Cohen hasn’t a shred of doubt that all of the 17 needing treatment are terrorists or suicide bombers.


Jonathan Hoffman

24 January, 2010 - 00:46

Rate this:

0 points

The troll has been unable to substantiate the story about 17 people being prevented from pssing through for corneal transplant surgery.

It is highly likely to be false.


moshetzarfati2

24 January, 2010 - 14:25

Rate this:

0 points

By the same token, Jonathan, the "Israel-right-or-wrong" trolls of CAMERA, Cifwatch and the ZF who are paid to disprove it couldn't, so it's highly likely to be true.

POST A COMMENT

You must be logged in to post a comment.